similar to: completion doesn't work anymore

I just built R-devel from source on OS X (Tiger), using the subversion sources. Running ./tools/rsync-recommended didn't download rcompgen. I checked http://cran.r-project/src/contrib/2.7.0/Recommended and indeed, this package is not there. If I try to install using install.packages I get > install.packages("rcompgen", type="source") --- Please select a CRAN

Hi all I'm updating a package for submission to CRAN, and I am getting an error message I never have seen before, and can't find out what it implies or means (and hence, what I need to do to fix it). After running R CMD check, I get this: <snip> * checking foreign function calls ... OK * checking R code for possible problems ... OK * checking Rd files ... OK * checking Rd

I just uploaded R 2.5.0 to Debian's unstable distribution. As Peter's announcement says, it now contains two new packages'rcompgen' and 'codetools'. About two or three weeks ago, I also packaged these, just like other 'recommended' packages as r-cran-rcompgen and r-cran-codetools. However, as "new" packages, they are still in the NEW queue awaiting

Dear all, can somebody point me from where to download "rcompgen" package? CRAN does not seem to hold that. Installing this package through install.packages() tells this package is not available. Thanks [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, I guess there have been discussions about this in the past and from what I understood hooking an R-function to facilitate automatic adjustment is problematic. So why not doing it like this: --- R-3.4.1/src/unix/sys-std.c 2017-03-24 00:03:59.000000000 +0100 +++ R-3.4.1/src/unix/sys-std.patched.c 2017-08-28 09:16:02.714204023 +0200 @@ -1005,6 +1005,9 @@ // introduced in

Dear list, R 2.5.0 packages for Debian stable (i386 and amd64) are now available from CRAN. The new recommended codetools and rcompgen packages haven't completely made it to Debian yet, but can of course be installed in the standard non-Debian ways. Please consult the README file in the Debian directory, and report problems to me directly or to this list. Best regards, Johannes Ranke --

Hi, Let's create the xxx object just to avoid confusion even if it's not necessary for reproducing the problem below: xxx <- 8:3 If I start typing this: max(xxx[ and now try to autocomplete with <TAB>, then I get the following error (and a warning): > max(xxx[Error in grep(sprintf("^%s", makeRegexpSafe(text)), allArgs, value = TRUE) : invalid

Hello All, I'm actually the system administrator of a UNIX system where several users use R version 2.6.0. I have a user who is trying to use the SURVEY package, and when he does, he gets the message: survey' is not a valid package -- installed < 2.0.0? When I run the library() command, I get (see below): Anything that is listed as ** No title available (pre-2.0.0 install?) **

Hi, I've begun to use the lme4 package, rather than nlme, for more flexibility during modelling, and running the examples in lmer I receive this error message: ---<---------------cut here---------------start-------------->--- R> (fm1 <- lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (Days|Subject), sleepstudy)) Error in printMer(object) : no slot of name "status" for this object of class

Hi, The rcompletion package, originally intended to provide completion for readline-based R interfaces, has undergone a number of changes. These changes are summarised below: o Reorganisation: - The package has been split into two. All the completion code has been moved to a pure R package called 'rcompgen'. 'rcompletion' now requires 'rcompgen' and

Hi, The rcompletion package, originally intended to provide completion for readline-based R interfaces, has undergone a number of changes. These changes are summarised below: o Reorganisation: - The package has been split into two. All the completion code has been moved to a pure R package called 'rcompgen'. 'rcompletion' now requires 'rcompgen' and

I've noticed something recently in R-beta that has changed since R 2.4.1 and I'm not sure if it's a readline problem or an R problem. I am on a Linux FC5 system and in R 2.4.1 I could do load("my-directory/ and then hit TAB and it would list all of the files in 'my-directory', after which I could start typing the beginning of the file, hit TAB again, and it would

On Fri, 1 Sep 2017, Ralf Goertz wrote: > Am Mon, 28 Aug 2017 09:33:31 +0200 > schrieb Ralf Goertz <r_goertz at web.de>: > > > Hello, me again > >> Hi, >> >> I guess there have been discussions about this in the past and from >> what I understood hooking an R-function to facilitate automatic >> adjustment is problematic. So why not doing it

Hi, A have small technical question about the calculation of R-squared using lm(). In a study case with experimental values, it seems more logical to force the regression line to pass through origin with lm(y ~ x +0). However, R-squared values are higher in this case than when I compute the linear regression with lm(y ~ x). It seems to be surprising to me: is this result normal ? Is there

Hi! I'm puzzled by the return value of ifelse consider x<-integer(0) ifelse(is(x, "character"), paste(x), x) [1] NA whereas if (is(x, "character")) return(paste(x)) else x [1] integer(0) or x<-integer(1) ifelse(is(x, "character"), paste(x), x) [1] 0 work as I had anticipated. Is this correct behaviour? Regards, Matthias >sessionInfo() R

Hi, i'm using dovecot with rawlog enabled. Well, i need to log the IP of the user, too. Could you give me a hint, how this can be implemented? Thanks and regards, Andreas Goertz.

Hi, sorry if this is explained somewhere but I didn't find anything. How can I use "Anova" from the car package to test a modell without between subject's factors? Suppose I have the following data mat.1 mat.2 mat.3 di ex 1 85 85 88 1 1 2 90 92 93 1 1 3 97 97 94 1 1 4 80 82 83 1 1 5 91 92 91 1 1 6 83 83

On 7 September 2016 at 17:27, Pawe? Pi?tkowski wrote: | Hello and apologies if this doesn't belong here. | | I'm trying to build a "portable" version of R - "portable" means that it could be easily moved to another location or machine simply by copying it. However, I encountered a problem when running it elsewhere: it seems that versions of dynamic libraries used by R

Hi, does the shapiro wilk test in R-1.3.0 work correctly? Maybe it does, but can anybody tell me why the following sample doesn't give "W = 1" and "p-value = 1": R> x<-1:9/10;x [1] 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 R> shapiro.test(qnorm(x)) Shapiro-Wilk normality test data: qnorm(x) W = 0.9925, p-value = 0.9986 I can't imagine a sample being

Hello and apologies if this doesn't belong here. I'm trying to build a "portable" version of R - "portable" means that it could be easily moved to another location or machine simply by copying it. However, I encountered a problem when running it elsewhere: it seems that versions of dynamic libraries used by R are fixed and set at the build time; when that instance of R