similar to: dynamic aggregation of many variables

I apologise for writing again about the problem with using stepAIC + multinom, but I think the reason why I had it in the first place is perhaps there may be a bug in either stepAIC or multinom. Just to repeat the problem, I have 126 variables and 99 cases. I don't know if the large number of variables could be the problem. Of couse the reason for doing a stepwise method is to reduce this

Dear Lest, I have a two-variable data frame as follows (the time peirod of the actual data set is 10 years): Date Amount 1 6/1/2007 1 2 6/1/2007 1 3 6/4/2007 2 4 6/5/2007 2 5 6/11/2007 3 6 6/12/2007 3 7 6/12/2007 3 8 6/13/2007 3 9 6/13/2007 3 10 6/18/2007 4 11 6/18/2007 4 12 6/25/2007 5 13 6/28/2007 5

Dear all, we''re currently looking forward to restructure our hardware environment for our datawarehousing product/suite/solution/whatever. We''re currently running the database side on various SF V440''s attached via dual FC to our SAN backend (EMC DMX3) with UFS. The storage system is (obviously in a SAN) shared between many systems. Performance is mediocre in terms

Hello everyone, This is Kangmin. I am trying to produce shape and scale of my wind data. My data is based on wind speed frequency with 1km/hr increment. data is described below. Windspeed (km/h) Frequency 1 351 2 147 3 317 4 378 5 527 6 667 7 865 8 970 9 987 10 907 11 905 12 642 13 1000 14 983 15 847 16 842 17 757 18 698 19 632 20 626 21 599 22 529 23 325 24 391

1.2 is on the way, more regression spotting needed! Yes, it makes the numbers worse, but it means Wine will get better ;-) - d. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani at redhat.com> Date: 13 June 2010 10:27 Subject: Re: Release plans To: wine-devel at winehq.org On 06/13/2010 10:39 AM, wylda at volny.cz wrote: > > Hi, another week and Sunday