similar to: Score test to evalutate the proportional odds assumption.

I want to test whether the proportional odds assumption for an ordered regression is met. The UCLA website points out that there is no mathematical way to test the proportional odds assumption (http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat//R/dae/ologit.htm), and use graphical inspection ("We were unable to locate a facility in R to perform any of the tests commonly used to test the parallel slopes

Dear list members, I am estimating an ordinal generalized estimating equations (GEE) regression model on repeated measurements data. Is there any way (preferably in R) to test the proportional odds assumption of this model? Thanks in advance. Andreas [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

For the following model, library(vcd) arth.polr <- polr(Improved ~ Sex + Treatment + Age, data=Arthritis) summary(arth.polr) where Improved is an ordered, 3-level response I'm looking for a *simple* way to test the validity of the proportional odds assumption, typically done via a score test for equal slopes/effects over the predictors. I do find a po.test= option in the repolr package

Dear community, I am currently attempting to perform a (L1) penalized ordinal logistic regression with proportional odds. For the moment I only found R packages allowing to perform forward or backward continuation ratio model with several penalizations. Does anyone have a clue of what R package I could use ? I am not even quite sure that penalized logistic regression with proportional odds has

Hello, I'm trying to fit a special kind of proportional odds model from: Whitehead et al. (2001). Meta-analysis of ordinal outcome using individual patient data. Statistics in medicine 20: 2243-2260. (model 2) The data are as follows: library(nlme) library(geepack) library(Design) library(MASS) options(contrasts=c("contr.SAS","contr.poly")) counts <-

R-experts: I would like to explore the partial proportional odds models of Peterson and Harrell (Applied Statistics 1990, 39(2): 205-217) for a dataset that I am analyzing. I have not been able to locate a R package that implements these models. Is anyone aware of existing R functions, packages, etc... that might be used to implement the partial proportional odds models? Brant Inman

Hi Since the 'equal slope' assumption doesn't hold in my data I cannot use a proportional odds model ('Design' library, together with 'Hmisc'). I would like to try therefore a partial proportional odds model Please, could anybody tell me, where to find the code and how to specify such a model ..or any potential alternatives many thanks for your kind help christoph

Dear Dr. Fieberg, you used a regression tree approach to explore ordinal data set in addition to the proportinal odds model. I find this very interesting. I would like to know, how good the results of the regression tree approach turned out in comparison to the proportional odds model. Since people very often treat ordinal data as continuous, I would like to know how successfull this strategy

I have a data set w/ an ordinal response taking on one of 10 categories. I am considering using polr to fit a cumulative logits model. I previously fit the model in SAS (using proc logistic) which provides a test for the proportional odds assumption (p < 0.001 for the test). Are there simple diagnostic plots that can be used to look at the validity of this assumption and possibly help w/

Is there a way to fit mixed proportional odds models in R? -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

I am trying to incorporate random effects (random intercept is good enough) to a proportional odds logistic regression model for ordinal outcomes. Could lme4 do this? I'd appreciate any input. Hakan Demirtas

Hello dear R-help mailing list, I wish to perform a non-parametric repeated measures anova. If what I read online is true, this could be achieved using a mixed Ordinal Regression model (a.k.a: Proportional Odds Model). I found two packages that seems relevant, but couldn't find any vignette on the subject: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/repolr/

Good evening, I'm trying to mount the proportional odds model (ordinal polytomous regression model) and most of my independent variables are qualitative (and are transformed into dummy). I have an inconvenience that I would like to help me resolve, below I present part of the code I'm developing for fitting the model (The variables included here are only for trial, because I have many

Dear useRs, I very much like the effect display of the proportional odds model on page 29 (Figure 8) of the following paper by John Fox: http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Papers/logit-effect-displays.pdf It really gives a very concise overview of the model. I would like to use it to illustrate the proportional odds mixed models we fit here for a project on Diabetes but I can't seem to reproduce

Hey, everyone, I am using proportional odds model for ordinal responses in dose-response experiments. For some samll data, SAS can successfully provide estimators of the parameters, but the built-in function polr() in R fails. Would you like to tell me how to make some change so I can use polr() to obtain the estimators? Or anyone can give me a hint about the conditions for the existance of MLE

Dear R developers: I am trying to fit a PPO model using vglm from the library VGAM, and get an error while executing the code. Here is the data, code, and error: Data: first row is the column names. a = age, and 1,2,3, 4 and 5 are condition grades. a 1 2 3 4 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 84 2 7 10 2 3 16 0 6 6 2 4 13 0 3 4 0 5 0 0 0 1 0 Library(VGAM)

Hi, I want to do a global likelihood ratio test for the proportional odds logistic regression model and am unsure how to go about it. I am using the polr() function in library(MASS). 1. Is the p-value from the likelihood ratio test obtained by anova(fit1,fit2), where fit1 is the polr model with only the intercept and fit2 is the full polr model (refer to example below)? So in the case of the

Hello all. I am doing one part of an evaluation of a mandatory welfare-to-work programme in the UK. As with all evaluations, the problem is to determine what would have happened if the initiative had not taken place. In our case, we have a number of pilot areas and no possibility of random assignment. Therefore we have been given control areas. My problem is to select for survey individuals in

Hi all!! I am using a proportinal odds model to study some ordered categorical data. I am trying to predict one ordered categorical variable taking into account only another categorical variable. I am using polr from the R MASS library. It seems to work ok, but I'm still getting familiar and I don't know how to assess goodness of fit. I have this output, when using response ~ independent

Hi all!! I am using a proportinal odds model to study some ordered categorical data. I am trying to predict one ordered categorical variable taking into account only another categorical variable. I am using polr from the R MASS library. It seems to work ok, but I'm still getting familiar and I don't know how to assess goodness of fit. I have this output, when using response ~ independent