similar to: (IT WAS) Aggregating an its series

I'm using a very long irregular time-series of air temperature and relative humidity of this kind (this is an extract only) its.format("% Y%d%m %X) > base T H 20020601 12.00.00 27.1 47 20020601 15.00.00 29.1 39 20020601 18.00.00 27.4 39 20020601 21.00.00 24.0 40 20020602 0.00.00 22.0 73 20020602 3.00.00 19.2 49 20020602 6.00.00 19.5 74 20020602

Hi All, I have a questions about associative list mappings in R, and if they are possible? I have data in the form show below, and want to make a new 'bucket' variable called combined. Which is the sum of the control and the exposed metric values This combined variable is a many to many matching as values only appear in the file if they have a value > 0. conversion.type filteredID

> On Nov 16, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: > > > ... except that Warren’s proposal that started this discussion seems to imply that he > > has a use case that requires reciprocals to be turned off separately. > > Just to close this loose end, yes I have a use case. > > Specifically, we have a customer that turns on

I don’t really like the idea of updating checks of UnsafeAlgebra() to depend on all of the other flags. It seems like it would be preferable to look at each optimization and figure out which flags it actually requires. I suspect that in many cases the “new” flag (i.e. allowing reassociation, etc.) will be what is actually needed anyway. I would be inclined to agree with Niolai’s suggestion of

Hi, Thanks for the quick feedback. I see your points, but I have a few questions/comments. I'll start at the end of the previous post: > ... > I think these are valuable problems to solve, but you should tackle them piece by piece: > > 1) the clang part of overriding the individual FMF and emitting the right IR is the first thing to fix. > 2) the backend is still using the

Hello world, I'm trying to do an anova on data in data.set, dependent variable is a column named "dep.var", grouping variable is in a column called "indep.var", and is.factor(indep.var) is TRUE... why can't I just do aov(dep.var ~ indep.var, data = data.set)? What have I done to deserve this?! What gives? Am I missing something totlly obvious? R-base-1.0.0-1,

Hi useRs! I would like to know how to make aggregated data.frame with aggregate() tabulated. For example, I run the following command to aggregate re with respect to group1 and group2. > (aggr <- with(final, aggregate(re, group1, group2, mean))) Group.1 Group.2 x 1 1992 15 0.16392 2 1993 15 0.15467 3 1994 15 0.15456 4 1995 15 0.15391

> On Nov 16, 2016, at 10:04 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: > > > Can you elaborate what kind of runtime failure is the reciprocal transformation triggering? > > Yes. It was along the lines of: > > { > float x = a / c; > float y = b / c; > > if (y == 1.0f) { > // do some processing for when

Dear All, Thanks to the suggestion of Prof Ripley I progressively solved the many libraries problems connected to the installation of the R package RODBC under FreeBSD 5.4. *** As far as this OS is concerned *** please take notice that the sentence in the README file:"..... Use the configure options --with-odbc-include and --with-odbc-lib or environment variables ODBC_INCLUDE and

Hi, Can you tell why my vnic built on top of an aggregation of 2 NICs of 1 Gbit/s doesn''t report a speed of 2 GBit/s ? [root at nazgul /]# dladm show-dev bge0 link: up speed: 1000Mb duplex: full bge1 link: down speed: 0Mb duplex: unknown bge2 link: down speed: 0Mb duplex: unknown bge3 link: down speed: 0Mb

Sorry for being sos insistent. Any helpful idea'?? ---------- Messaggio inoltrato ---------- Subject: [Samba] Problems with samba under FreeBSD, not under Linux Date: 19:02, mercoled? 24 novembre 2004 From: Vittorio <v.demartino2@virgilio.it> To: samba@lists.samba.org Dear All, (Context: Office windows LAN; PC Pentium 3 with 128 MB, FreeBSD 5.3.) Here you are the unanswered

Author: Darren Moffat <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Latest revision: 957d30a3607ed9f3cbe490da5894d1e1b2104033 Total changesets: 28 Log message: resync onnv_105 partial for 6713916 Files: usr/src/Makefile.lint usr/src/Targetdirs usr/src/cmd/Makefile usr/src/cmd/Makefile.cmd usr/src/cmd/acctadm/Makefile usr/src/cmd/acctadm/acctadm.xcl

>All that said, I think we (the company I work for, Sony) will have to implement support >for these switches. It comes down to GCC has these switches (e.g., -fno-reciprocal-math >and -fno-associative-math), and they do suppress the transformations for our customers. >They switch to Clang/LLVM, they use the same switches, and it doesn't "work". So as a >practical

On the plus side, I'm glad to see the conclusions of the last couple of posts. From Mehdi: > Hope this clarify where I see the direction going, and even if you don’t agree with my > reasoning, the conclusion should be satisfactory on your side :) I'd say that summarizes my thoughts on this well. And from Nicolai: > Right. I'm not fundamentally opposed to having these

OS: Solaris 10 5/08 s10s_u5wos_10 Sol 10 U5 panic on removing device from aggr during scp copy files For some reason, I can not get the dump file out of the server. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

> On Nov 17, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 17, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: >> >> On the plus side, I'm glad to see the conclusions of the last couple of posts. >> >> From Mehdi: >> >>> Hope this clarify where I see the

With pleasure we announce the release of tinc versions 1.0.32 and 1.1pre15. Here is a summary of the changes in tinc 1.0.32: * Fix segmentation fault when using Cipher = none. * Fix Proxy = exec. * Support PriorityInheritance for IPv6 packets. * Fixes for Solaris tun/tap support. * Bind outgoing TCP sockets when ListenAddress is used. Thanks to Vittorio Gambaletta for his contribution to this

With pleasure we announce the release of tinc versions 1.0.32 and 1.1pre15. Here is a summary of the changes in tinc 1.0.32: * Fix segmentation fault when using Cipher = none. * Fix Proxy = exec. * Support PriorityInheritance for IPv6 packets. * Fixes for Solaris tun/tap support. * Bind outgoing TCP sockets when ListenAddress is used. Thanks to Vittorio Gambaletta for his contribution to this

Dear All, (Context: Office windows LAN; PC Pentium 3 with 128 MB, FreeBSD 5.3.) Here you are the unanswered message I sent to the FreeBSD mailing list: \BEGIN{MESSAGE} -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- After installing and launching samba 3.0.7 daemons under my postgresql FBSD5.3 stable server at office, I'm having trouble in connecting

I decided to take a stab at 6601421 dladm set-linkprop should support multiple -p options along with some related linkprop fixes, but when I looked into dladm.c, was surprised to find that "dladm_parse_props()" is called from do_create_aggr and do_create_vlan in addition to the expected (by me, at least) do_create_vnic *linkprop functions. What happened here? Why do we pass in