Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "GLMMGibbs"
2001 Aug 30
1
GLMMGibbs crashes on seeds data
Hi all
I know GLMMGibbs is still in beta but has anyone experienced (and
solved ;-) this problem?
I decided to look at the seeds example but I get a core dump on two
intel linux boxes and also a sun workstation. All are running R1.3.0
but different hardware/OS's so I think I've done something wrong
> library(GLMMGibbs)
> data(seeds)
> seeds$plate <- as.factor(1:21)
>
2002 Jan 19
1
correlated random effects in GLMMGibbs ?
Dear R-users,
I wondered if anyone has extended GLMMGibbs to include correlated
random effects, and if so, whether they would be willing to let me
use their code?
Jonathan Myles has no plans to extend glmm in this manner within the
foreseeable future.
With thanks,
Patty
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assoc Prof Patty Solomon
2003 Oct 08
1
Installing GLMMGibbs problems
Dear all;
Installing the GLMMGibbs package to my Solaris Unix box, I got an compiling
error:
ars.c:497:10: missing terminating " character
ars.c: In function `dump_arse':
ars.c:498: error: parse error before "mylesj"
.....
The compiling error was reported to the list on Jul 3, 2003. According to
Prof. Brain Ripley this is a known problem with the package and gcc 3.3,
2005 Dec 15
1
generalized linear mixed model by ML
Dear All,
I wonder if there is a way to fit a generalized linear mixed models (for repeated binomial data) via a direct Maximum Likelihood Approach. The "glmm" in the "repeated" package (Lindsey), the "glmmPQL" in the "MASS" package (Ripley) and "glmmGIBBS" (Myle and Calyton) are not using the full maximum likelihood as I understand. The
2003 Jul 03
1
compilation error when installing GLMMGibbs on SuSE Linux 8.2 (R v. 1.7.1)
I getting compilation errors when trying to install GLMMGibbs (see below).
I'm running R v 1.7.1 on SuSE Linux 8.2.
Has anyone else had this problem? I tried it on a Win2000/R 1.5.1 combination
and it worked fine. Any hints are greatly appreciated.
Thank you in advance,
Damien
>install.packages("GLMMGibbs")
trying URL `http://cran.r-project.org/src/contrib/PACKAGES'
2002 Apr 12
1
summary: Generalized linear mixed model software
Thanks to those who responded to my inquiry about generalized linear
mixed models on R and S-plus. Before I summarize the software, I note
that there are several ways of doing statistical inference for
generalized linear mixed models:
(1)Standard maximum likelihood estimation, computationally intensive
due to intractable likelihood function
(2) Penalized quasi likelihood or similar
2002 Apr 01
2
writing a package for generalized linear mixed modesl
Happy new month, everyone!
I am planning to write a NIH grant proposal to study ways to speed
Monte Carlo based maximum likelihood algorithm for hierarchical models
with a focus on generalized linear mixed models (GLM with random
effects). I thought it would be nice and also increase the chance of
funding if I could produce an R package in the process. I understand
that Prof. Pinheiro ang Bates
2002 Jan 18
1
TeX error generated by R CMD CHECK
Hello,
can anyone explain the following error I get when trying to
use the CHECK command to check a new version of my pakcage under 1.4.0?
******
./R CMD check ~/GLMMGibbs.0.5.1/GLMMGibbs
* checking for working latex ... OK
* using log directory `/homef/jonm/R-1.4.0/bin/GLMMGibbs.Rcheck'
...
<Installs library, documentation, and then performs various tests,
including the example,
2002 Oct 28
2
glmm for binomial data? (OT)
A while ago (April 2002) there was a short thread on software for generalized
linear mixed models.
Since that time, has anyone written or found R code to use a glmm to analyze
binomial data? I study CWD in white-tailed deer, and I'd like to do a
similar analysis as Kleinschmidt et al. (2001, Am. J. Epidemiology 153:
1213-1221) used to assess control for spatial structure in malaria
2002 May 08
1
HGLM in R (was: writing a package for generalized linear mixed models)
I wonder if someone has tried to implement the hierarchical generalized
linear model (HGLM) approach of Lee and Nelder (JRSSB, 1996, 58: 619-56) in R.
Thanks in advance.
Emmanuel Paradis
At 17:18 01/04/02 +0100, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk wrote:
>On Mon, 1 Apr 2002, Jason Liao wrote:
>
>> Happy new month, everyone!
>>
>> I am planning to write a NIH grant proposal to study
2002 May 23
1
Multilevel model with dichotomous dependent variable
Greetings-
I'm working with data that are multilevel in nature and have a dichotomous
outcome variable (presence or absence of an attribute). As far as I can
tell from reading archives of the R and S lists, as well as Pinheiro and
Bates and Venables and Ripley,
- nlme does not have the facility to do what amounts to a mixed-effects
logistic regression.
- The canonical alternative is
2002 Apr 08
1
glmm
Hello,
I would like to fit generalized linear mixed models but I did not find
the package allowing such procedure.
R help under nlme package gives me "glmmPQL(MASS)" but this file does
not appear in contributed packages.
Thanks in advance for your answer.
Alexandre MILLON
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read
2001 Oct 26
2
glim and gls
Hello,
I would like to know if there is any package that allow us to fit
Generalized Linear Models via Maximum Likelihood and Linear Models using
Generalized Least Squarse in R as the functions glim and gls,
respectively, from S-Plus.
Also, anybody know if there is any package that fit Log-Linear Models
using Generalized Least Squares?
Any help will be very useful.
Thanks,
--
Frederico
2004 Nov 01
1
GLMM
Hello,
I have a problem concerning estimation of GLMM. I used methods from 3 different
packages (see program). I would expect similar results for glmm and glmmML. The
result differ in the estimated standard errors, however. I compared the results to
MASS, 4th ed., p. 297. The results from glmmML resemble the given result for
'Numerical integration', but glmm output differs. For the
2004 May 29
1
GLMM error in ..1?
I'm trying to use GLMM in library(lme4), R 1.9.0pat, updated just
now. I get an error message I can't decipher:
library(lme4)
set.seed(1)
n <- 10
N <- 1000
DF <- data.frame(yield=rbinom(n, N, .99)/N, nest=1:n)
fit <- GLMM(yield~1, random=~1|nest, family=binomial, data=DF,
weights=rep(N, n))
Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : ..1 used in an incorrect
2004 Feb 17
3
parse error in GLMM function
Hi R-Helpers:
I?m trying to use the function GLMM from lme4 package, (R-1.8.1, Windows
98),and I get the following error:
> pd5 = GLMM(nplant~sitio+
+ fert+
+ remo+
+ sitio:fert+
+ remo:sitio+
+ remo:fert+
+ remo:fert:sitio
+ data=datos,
+ family=binomial,
+
2004 Jun 01
2
GLMM(..., family=binomial(link="cloglog"))?
I'm having trouble using binomial(link="cloglog") with GLMM in
lme4, Version: 0.5-2, Date: 2004/03/11. The example in the Help file
works fine, even simplified as follows:
fm0 <- GLMM(immun~1, data=guImmun, family=binomial, random=~1|comm)
However, for another application, I need binomial(link="cloglog"),
and this generates an error for me:
>
2004 Oct 19
1
Fatal error: invalid home drive
Dear R-helpers,
I have just installed R2.0.0 onto my machine which already had R1.9.1
present.
I then tried to add to R2.0.0 a library called GLMM written by James McBroom
for R1.6.0. Unfortunately, R2.0.0 does not recognise the library, even
though
R1.9.1 does. This is not because I have used the wrong case in the call to
the
library:
> library('GLMM')
> "Error in
2005 Apr 30
2
formula in fixed-effects part of GLMM
Can GLMM take formula derived from another object?
foo <- glm (OVEN ~ h + h2, poisson, dataset)
# ok
bar <- GLMM (OVEN ~ h + h2, poisson, dataset, random = list (yr = ~1))
#error
bar <- GLMM (foo$formula, poisson, dataset, random = list (yr = ~1))
#Error in foo$("formula" + yr + 1) : invalid subscript type
I am using R2.1.0, lme4 0.8-2, windows xp. Below is a dataset if you
2002 Feb 13
0
glmms with negative binomial responses
I am trying to find a way to analyze a "simple" mixed model with two
levels of a treatment, a random blocking factor, and (wait for it)
negative binomial count distributions as the response variable. As far as
I can tell, the currently available R offerings (glmmGibbs, glmmPQL in
MASS, and Jim Lindsey's glmm code) aren't quite up to this. From what I
have read (e.g.