Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Day.find_all_with_appointments - INNER JOIN"
2006 Jan 10
0
bug? : STI and :include => fk and class_name MUST be specified
I suspect this is a bug. Or a limitation.
Problem:
----------------
When you include a STI class in a ''find'' :
@results = Result.find :all, :include => :event
, you are forced to specify the fk and the class name :
belongs_to :event , :class_name => "Event", :foreign_key =>
"event_id"
.
Full code:
-----------
class Event <
2020 Feb 07
0
[RFC PATCH v7 53/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_EVENTS
From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com>
This command enables/disables vCPU introspection events.
Signed-off-by: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com>
Co-developed-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com>
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst | 45 +++++++++-
include/linux/kvmi_host.h
2020 Feb 07
0
[RFC PATCH v7 44/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CONTROL_EVENTS
With this command the introspection tool enables/disables VM events
(ie. KVMI_EVENT_UNHOOK), because no event (neither VM event, nor vCPU
event) will be sent to the introspection tool unless enabled/requested.
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com>
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst | 44 +++++++++++++++--
include/linux/kvmi_host.h | 2
2007 Jun 28
1
complete stumper: variable exists in hidden_field_tag, but nil everywhere else
This is a real mystery to me. I have an instance variable in a partial
that only gives its value inside a hidden_field_tag. If I try to use
the variable anywhere else in the partial, i either get nil or an
undefined error. The goal is to use the value of @event.id outside of
hidden_field_tag.
Here''s what works:
<%= hidden_field_tag ''id'', @event && @event.id,
2020 Jul 21
0
[PATCH v9 45/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VM_CONTROL_EVENTS
By default, all introspection VM events are disabled. The introspection
tool must explicitly enable the VM events it wants to receive. With
this command (KVMI_VM_CONTROL_EVENTS) it can enable/disable any VM event
(e.g. KVMI_EVENT_UNHOOK) if allowed by the device manager.
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com>
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst | 44
2006 Mar 21
2
Sorting by computed temporary field
Hey all,
I''m rather new to Ruby and Rails (and not great with SQL), but I''m
developing a ride sharing app and would like to be able to sort on
something I don''t have stored.
I have users, events, and rides, each of which has a zip code. Events
have_many rides, and rides belong_to events.
When an event is selected, I''d like to be able to show a list of
2010 Feb 16
0
Strange routing(?) Issue
I have a Model event and the following two lines in routes.rb
1 - map.connect "events/:action", :controller => ''events'', :action => /
[a-z_]+/i
2 - map.resources :events, :has_many => :comments, :has_one
=> :address #, :collection => {:mapit => :get}
I have #1 so that I can call custom actions from a link_to_remote link
from my index page t0 update a
2007 Nov 22
1
has_many :through questions
I''ve created the following associations using :through:
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :attendees, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :events, :through => :attendees, :uniq => true
end
class Event < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :attendees, :dependent => :destroy
has_many :people, :through => :attendees, :uniq => true
2020 Jul 21
0
[PATCH v9 81/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_SINGLESTEP
From: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com>
This event is sent after each instruction when the singlestep has been
enabled for a vCPU.
Signed-off-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com>
Co-developed-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com>
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/kvmi.rst | 31
2020 Jul 21
0
[PATCH v9 44/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_UNHOOK
In certain situations (when the guest has to be paused,
suspended, migrated, etc.), the device manager will use
the KVM_INTROSPECTION_PREUNHOOK ioctl in order to trigger the
KVMI_EVENT_UNHOOK event. If the event is sent successfully (the VM has an
active introspection channel), the device manager should delay the action
(pause/suspend/...) to give the introspection tool the chance to remove
its
2004 Feb 26
2
Trivial API question
I know - I like to futz. I''m thinking of changing the way I pass
optional arguments. This is from EventLog:
# Write an event to the event log
# Current way
el.report_event(
"source" => "foo",
"category" => 0x2,
"event_id" => 0x3,
"data" => "Warning! Danger Will Robinson!",
"type"
2020 Feb 07
0
[RFC PATCH v7 64/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_XSETBV
From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com>
This event is sent when the extended control register XCR0 is going to
be changed.
Signed-off-by: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com>
Co-developed-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com>
---
2020 Jul 21
0
[PATCH v9 75/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_MSR and KVMI_EVENT_MSR
From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com>
This command is used to enable/disable introspection for a specific
MSR. The KVMI_EVENT_MSR event is sent when the tracked MSR is going to
be changed. The introspection tool can respond by allowing the guest to
continue with normal execution or by discarding the change.
This is meant to prevent malicious changes to MSRs
such as
2006 Jul 19
1
Catch 22 with after_save. Please help.
I have a pretty strange problem. Here is basically what I have to
demonstrate my problem:
class Event < ActiveRecord::Base
def after_create
AnotherClass.find_event(id)
end
end
class AnotherClass < ActiveRecord::Base
def self.find_event(event_id)
e = Event.find event_id
end
end
Here is the catch 22 and it''s quite annoying. Basically ActiveRecord
puts to whole save
2020 Feb 07
0
[RFC PATCH v7 57/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_HYPERCALL
From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com>
This event is sent on a specific user hypercall.
It is used by the code residing inside the introspected guest to call the
introspection tool and to report certain details about its operation.
For example, a classic antimalware remediation tool can report
what it has found during a scan.
Signed-off-by: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at
2020 Jul 21
0
[PATCH v9 68/84] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_EVENT_XSETBV
From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com>
This event is sent when an extended control register XCR is going to
be changed.
Signed-off-by: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com>
Co-developed-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicu?or C??u <ncitu at bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com>
---
2006 Apr 11
1
acts_as ... hourly_list?
Hi,
My question is a bit of wonder and a bit of enlightment.
I have two models, Channel and ChannelItem, the second is a list of
Events, ordered by position (because I''m using acts_as_list).
Later I use a method in Channel to recalculate the hour when that show
come online, based on the duration of it and doing math based on the
previous one duration and start time, starting from
2007 Apr 09
1
help with ActiveRecord joins
I''m working on a fairly complex join query and could use a bit of advice
from more expert users of ActiveRecord.
I have an events table with quite a lot of data, with has_many relations
to categories, age_groups, and event_images. In my first naive
implementation, each event had a date, so to load all upcoming events
efficiently, I''d do:
Event.find(:all,
2020 Feb 07
0
[RFC PATCH v7 60/78] KVM: introspection: add KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR and KVMI_EVENT_CR
From: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com>
Using the KVMI_VCPU_CONTROL_CR command, the introspection tool subscribes
to KVMI_EVENT_CR events that will be sent when CR{0,3,4} is going to
be changed.
Signed-off-by: Mihai Don?u <mdontu at bitdefender.com>
Co-developed-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com>
Signed-off-by: Adalbert Laz?r <alazar at bitdefender.com>
2006 May 20
0
EventLog#tail is broken
I just discovered something awful. The EventLog#tail method does not
work the way I thought it did. Instead of picking up new events as
they''re added, it''s really just iterating backwards through the current
event log backwards.
Look at this sample below. The first record is correct. Then another
event happens, but instead of the latest record, I get an *earlier*