similar to: Active Record Attributes using Dot Notation doesn''t work

Hello, JIT compiler interferes with internal R completions: compiler::enableJIT(2) utils:::functionArgs("density", '') gives: utils:::functionArgs("density", '') Note: no visible global function definition for 'bw.nrd0' Note: no visible global function definition for 'bw.nrd' Note: no visible global function definition for 'bw.ucv'

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am trying to create a user with dbox format. i get this error: dovecot: Jan 28 13:45:34 Error: IMAP(ebal2): Mail storage creation failed with mail_location: dbox:/var/mail/folders/testuser dovecot: Jan 28 13:45:34 Error: child 5336 (imap) returned error 89 my conf has this entry: mail_location: dbox:/var/mail/folders/%u dovecot 1.0.10 any

What do people think of this? http://www.humanized.com/weblog/2006/06/30/collaboration_made_simple_with_bracket_notation/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Find out how you can get spam free email. http://www.bluebottle.com/tag/3

If I knew this, I have forgotten it: Is there a way to force R to forgo use of scientific notation, e.g. to use .000029 instead of 2.9e-05? (Aside from using formatC for example) I run across this every now and then and work around it (multiple values by 100, for example) but cannot find any way to deal with it otherwise. A particularly problematic place it pops up is in axis tick labels.

Hello, Firstly, real new to R here. I have a function intended to evaluate the values in columns spread over many tables. I have an argument in the function that allows the user to input what sequence of tables they want to draw data from. The function seems to work fine, but when the user inputs a single number (over 9) instead of a sequence using the : operator, I find an error message: the

I am using Rwave wavelets and I need better axis notation. Does anyone have code similar to matlab's centfreq or scale2frq functions that turn a scale for a wavelet transform into a good looking scale to plot on my wavelet transfoms? I am using the rwave package to investigate seismic signals from an exploding volcano. Jonathan Lees -- ==========================================

Hi I am using xyplot() to plot on the log scale by using scale=list(log=T) argument. For example: xyplot(1:10~1:10, scales=list(log=T)) But the axis labels are printed as scientific notation (10^0.0, etc), instead of fixed notation. How can I change that to fixed notation? options(scipen=4) doesn't work on xyplot() Thanks John

Is there a better alternative to x = c(1e7, 2e7) x.lb = c(0,1e7,2e7) s.lb = format(x.lb, scientific = FALSE, big.mark = ",") barplot(x, yaxt = "n", ylab = "") axis(side = 2, at = x.lb, labels = s.lb) (I am sure there is a better alternative to line 2 :)). Thank you. -- View this message in context:

Hi John, Why not just try both and see which one makes sense? On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 12:24 PM, John <miaojpm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question on ggplot2 with the second axis, but I don't think one > needs to know ggplot2 package in order to answer this question. > > In this example, > https://rpubs.com/MarkusLoew/226759 > since the

And you're allowing saturate/neg emission on the short form. Is this already in envytools? Also, what's the shortForm thing? This change is probably fine, but the changelog needs work. On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 7:22 PM, Roy Spliet <rspliet at eclipso.eu> wrote: > MAD IMM has a very specific SDST == SSRC2 requirement, so don't emit > > Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <rspliet

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov (mva) <netfilter at mva.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter at mva.name --- Comment #1 from Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov (mva) <netfilter at

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> --- There are already kernel

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |admin at rollinix.net --- Comment #3 from Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> --- *** Bug 994

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Tom Hughes <tom at compton.nu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tom at compton.nu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Pablo Neira Ayuso

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo at netfilter.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason.lee.campbell at gmail.co | |m --- Comment #5 from

Here is the warning I am getting: PseudoSourceValue.cpp R:\SDKs\llvm\trunk\include\llvm/Support/ManagedStatic.h(23) : warning C4156: deletion of an array expression without using the array form of 'delete'; array form substituted R:\SDKs\llvm\trunk\include\llvm/Support/ManagedStatic.h(72) : see reference to function template instantiation 'void

Hello, llvm-bcanalyzer told me that the size of the BLOCKINFO_BLOCK of my file is "1.345017e+01" percent of the whole file. This is not very readable. The attached patch prints the percentage without scientific notation so we get something bit more readable: Block ID #0 (BLOCKINFO_BLOCK): Num Instances: 1 Total Size: 637b/79.62B/19W % of file: 13.450169 Num

Hi, Andreas Neustifter <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> writes: > Maybe you can use the already available "include/llvm/Support/Format.h"? Thanks, that simplifies the patch a lot. See the attached patch. Btw, llvm-bcanalyzer.cpp seems to also use fprintf -- does mixing it with errs() cause problems and should it be converted to use format()? best regards, Timo Lindfors

On Sep 29, 2009, at 9:44 AM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote: > Hi, > > Andreas Neustifter <astifter-llvm at gmx.at> writes: >> Maybe you can use the already available "include/llvm/Support/ >> Format.h"? > > Thanks, that simplifies the patch a lot. See the attached patch. It looks like something similar got applied back in r82772 on 9/25. > > Btw,