Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "nlme_crossed AND nested random effects"
2010 Oct 18
1
Crossed random effects in lme
Dear all,
I am trying to fit a model with crossed random effects using lme. In this
experiment, I have been measuring oxygen consumption (mlmin) in bird
nestlings, originating from three different treatments (treat), in a
respirometer with 7 different channels (ch). I have also measured body mass
(mass) for these birds.
id nest treat year mlmin mass ch hack
1EP51711 17
2003 Jul 01
1
crossed random effects
Hi,
I have a data set on germination and plant growth with
the following variables:
dataset=fm
mass (response)
sub (fixed effect)
moist (fixed effect)
pop (fixed effect)
mum (random effect nested within population)
iheight (covariate)
plot (random effect- whole plot factor for split-plot
design).
I want to see if moist or sub interacts with mum for
any of the pops, but I am getting an error
2004 Aug 04
1
cross random effects
Dear friends,
I have asked last few days about cross-random effects
using PQL, but I have not receive any answer because
might my question was not clear.
My question was about analysing the salamander mating
data using PQL. This data contain cross-random effects
for (male) and for (female). By opining MASS and lme
library. I wrote this code
sala.glmm <- glmmPQL(fixed=y~WSf*WSM,
2006 Jul 28
3
random effects with lmer() and lme(), three random factors
Hi, all,
I have a question about random effects model. I am dealing with a
three-factor experiment dataset. The response variable y is modeled
against three factors: Samples, Operators, and Runs. The experimental
design is as follow:
4 samples were randomly chosen from a large pool of test samples. Each
of the 4 samples was analyzed by 4 operators, randomly selected from a
group of
2012 Jan 23
2
model non-nested random effects in nlme library
Hello all,
In lme4 if you want to model two non-nested random effects you code it like
this:
mod1 <- lmer(y~x + (1|randomvar1) + (1|randomvar2))
How would you go about to model something similar in nlme?
In my database I have two variables for which I have repeated measures, lets
call them "individual" and "year".
But none of the "individuals" were measured in
2008 Aug 25
1
aov, lme, multcomp
I am doing an analysis and would like to use lme() and the multcomp
package to do multiple comparisons. My design is a within subjects
design with three crossed fixed factors (every participant sees every
combination of three fixed factors A,B,C). Of course, I can use aov() to
analyze this with an error term (leaving out the obvious bits):
y ~ A*B*C+Error(Subject/(A*B*C))
I'd also like
2005 Feb 08
2
lme4 --> GLMM
hello!
this is a question, how can i specify the random part in the GLMM-call
(of the lme4 library) for compound matrices just in the the same way as
they defined in the lme-Call (of the nlme library). For example
i would just need
random=list(my.Subject=pdBlocked(list(pdIdent(~... , ...),pdIdent(~... ,
...))))
this specification , if i also attach library(nlme) , is not
2005 Feb 08
2
lme4 --> GLMM
hello!
this is a question, how can i specify the random part in the GLMM-call
(of the lme4 library) for compound matrices just in the the same way as
they defined in the lme-Call (of the nlme library). For example
i would just need
random=list(my.Subject=pdBlocked(list(pdIdent(~... , ...),pdIdent(~... ,
...))))
this specification , if i also attach library(nlme) , is not
2005 Dec 09
1
lmer for 3-way random anova
I have been using lme from nlme to do a 3-way anova with all the effects treated as random. I was wondering if someone could direct me to an example of how to do this using lmer from lme4.
I have 3 main effects, tim, trt, ctr, and all the interaction effects tim*trt*ctr. The response variable is ge.
Here is my lme code:
dat <-
2003 May 12
1
update.lme trouble (PR#2985)
Try this
data(Assay)
as1 <- lme(logDens~sample*dilut, data=Assay,
random=pdBlocked(list(
pdIdent(~1),
pdIdent(~sample-1),
pdIdent(~dilut-1))))
update(as1,random=pdCompSymm(~sample-1))
update(as1,random=pdCompSymm(~sample-1))
update(as1,random=pdCompSymm(~sample-1))
update(as1,random=pdCompSymm(~sample-1))
I'm
2006 Apr 20
1
A question about nlme
Hello,
I have used nlme to fit a model, the R syntax is like
fmla0<-as.formula(paste("~",paste(colnames(ldata[,9:13]),collapse="+"),"-1"))
> fmla1<-as.formula(paste("~",paste(colnames(ldata[,14:18]),collapse="+"),"-1"))
>
2011 Jan 21
1
TRADUCING lmer() syntax into lme()
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Freddy Gamma <freddy.gamma@gmail.com>
Date: 2011/1/21
Subject: TRADUCING lmer() syntax into lme()
To: r-sig-mixed-models@r-project.org
Dear Rsociety,
I'd like to kingly ask to anyone is willing to answer me how to implement a
NON NESTED random effects structure in lme()
In particular I've tried the following translation from lmer to
2004 Aug 05
1
cross random effects (more information abuot the data)
Dear friends,
I have asked last few days about cross-random effects
using PQL, but I have not receive any answer because
might my question was not clear.
My question was about analysing the salamander mating
data using PQL. This data contain cross-random effects
for (male) and for (female). By opining MASS and lme
library. I wrote this code
sala.glmm <- glmmPQL(fixed=y~WSf*WSM,
2002 Sep 13
2
Multiple random effects inlme?
Moi!
I was helping to teach a course on mixed models this week, and we came
across a problem with coding more than one random effect in lme when
they aren't nested.
As an example, suppose we have an experiment where we sample moths from
several populations, and place the moths on different trees, and measure
a trait (in this case survival of offspring, but that's less
important). We
2006 Mar 22
1
An lme model that works in old R.2.1.1 but not always in R.2.2.0 - why?
Following lme model runs fine in general under R.2.1.1 but only for 9 out
of my 11 response variables under R.2.2.0.
model for one of my response variables:
lme(Yresp~F1fix,random=list(const=pdBlocked(list(~F2mix-1,~Ass:F1fix-1,~F3mix-1,~F1fix:F3mix-1,~F2mix:F3mix-1),pdClass="pdIdent")))
Yresp is my response variable, F1fix is a fixed effect factor whereas
F2mix and F3mix are random
2002 Jan 25
0
nested versus crossed random effects
Hi all,
I'm trying to test a repeated measures model with random effects using the
nlme library. Suppose I have two within subjects factors A, B both with
two levels. Using aov I can do:
aov.1 <- aov(y ~ A*B + Error(S/(A+B))
following Pinheiro and Bates I can acheive the analagous mixed-effects
model with:
lme.1 <- lme(y~A*B, random=pdBlocked(list(pdIdent(~1),pdIdent(~A-1),
2003 Jun 17
1
lme() vs aov(y ~ A*B + Error(aa %in% A + bb %in% B)) [repost]
I've posted the following to R-help on May 15.
It has reproducible R code for real data -- and a real
(academic, i.e unpaid) consultion background.
I'd be glad for some insight here, mainly not for myself.
In the mean time, we've learned that it is to be expected for
anova(*, "marginal") to be contrast dependent, but still are
glad for advice if you have experience.
Thank
2003 Sep 25
0
mixing nested and crossed factors using lme
Hi all,
I have an experiment where 5 raters assessed the quality of 24 web sites. (each rater rated each site once). I want to come up with a measure of reliability of the ratings for the web sites ie to what extent does each rater give the same (or similar) rating to each web site. My idea was to fit a random effects model using lme and from that, calculate the intraclass correlation as a
2003 Feb 19
1
Nested Design Coding Question
I'm a SAS user who is slowly but surely migrating over to R. I'm trying to
find the proper code to analyze a nested design. I have four
classification variables, L (fixed), A (random within L), D (random within
L), and I (random within L). The model I'm interested in is
L A(L) D(L) I(L) A:D:I(L),
where the interaction is interpreted as the lack-of-fit term. I've tried
2006 Jan 03
3
Package for multiple membership model?
Hello all:
I am interested in computing what the multilevel modeling literature calls a multiple membership model. More specifically, I am working with a data set involving clients and providers. The clients are the lower-level units who are nested within providers (higher-level). However, this is not nesting in the usual sense, as clients can belong to multple providers, which I understand