similar to: Compiling R 1.8.x under Solaris 9

I'm having a dynamic loading problem that seems to be caused by exponentiation (the ** operator in Fortran/ratfor). This can be illustrated by the following toy example: ===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+===+=== % cat foo.r subroutine foo(x,n) x = x**n return end % f77 -c foo.r /tmp/ratfor.06661.0.f: foo: % R CMD SHLIB -o foo.so foo.o gcc -G -o

I've installed hdf5 [library & includes] here locally, last week. [see ?hdf5save in R] There is a remaining compilation / linking problem for me: The hdf5 library uses "compress2" a routine defined in Gnu's zlib, but not available in the zlib that comes with X11R6.3 (which we have installed). Now unfortunately, the final link statement for R (0.65) [for me, with hdf5

For disk space reasons, I have the Sun FORTRAN and C comiplers available, but not C++. In the past, I have successfully built R using these compliers along with the C++ provided by gcc. Now, the configure script in 1.5.0 fails with the following errors: checking how to get verbose linking output from f77... -v checking for Fortran 77 libraries... -L/usr/local/lib -R/opt/SUNWspro/lib

Full_Name: Christine Brower Version: 1.4.1 OS: Solaris 8 Submission from: (NULL) (128.151.148.205) Configure options fails with following message: ./configure --with-f77 loading cache ./config.cache checking for a BSD compatible install... tools/install-sh -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes checking for working aclocal... missing

> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 11:30:20 +0200 (MET DST) > From: Albrecht Gebhardt <albrecht.gebhardt@uni-klu.ac.at> > > I think in R we can do better than at present, if only I knew > > exactly how. One idea is to have (effectively) a `hints' file that > > configure uses to add a base set of libraries to FLIBS, but on Solaris > > at least, using the Fortran

Hi, I am trying to compile R 1.9.1 and 2.0.0 on Solaris 2.8 with Sun Studio Fortran 95 compiler but I have obtained some errors which I enclose. I have compiled R with g77 GNU compiler and it was OK. Does anyone know if R 2.0.0 has been successfully built on Solaris 2.8 with Sun Studio Fortran 95 compiler? or at least, How could I achieve this? The R installation manual does not have any

Hello, I tried to compile v2.3.1 on Solaris x86 with SUN Pro compilers. I had an error while stats libarary was being compiled and I notice that "-xtarget=generic64" was not passed to f95 while cc used it. Could you tell me how to fix this problem? f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c sgram.f -o sgram.o f95 -PIC -O -I/mounts/devel/SUNWspro/prod/include -c

Hi, Could you help me to install the rgl package on Solaris 10 x86? I tried and got the following error messages. When I compiled my R as 64bit, I used the SUN ProW compilers. However, gcc seems to being used below as well as missing some information. Thank you in advance, Dongseok > install.packages("rgl") --- Please select a CRAN mirror for use in this session --- *

Hi! I'm trying to compile R (32-bit) on Solaris 10 x86 using Sun Studio 10 + Sun Perflib (for BLAS and LAPACK) but encountered issues with undefined symbol "bratio". Appreciate any help. Compiler options (from configure output): ============================================== R is now configured for i386-pc-solaris2.10 Source directory: . Installation directory:

Hmnnn... This is the third version of R I have installed and I am stumped on this one. There is some unresolved external I cannot find... /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -v -o R.bin CConverters.o Rdynload.o RNG.o apply.o arithmetic.o array.o attrib.o bind.o builtin.o character.o coerce.o colors.o complex.o connections.o context.o cov.o cum.o dcf.o datetime.o debug.o devPS.o devPicTeX.o deparse.o

I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11. My config.site looks like this: #! /bin/sh AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar" TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex" LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex" PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"

I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11. My config.site looks like this: #! /bin/sh AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar" TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex" LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex" PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"

Hi, I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong here. With the single source file attached to this email, I tried the following commands: llvmgcc -o timeLLVMfft timeLLVMfft.c -lm llc -o timeLLVMfft.s timeLLVMfft.bc /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -xarch=v9 -o timeLLVMfft.sparc timeLLVMfft.s I got the errors at the bottom of this email in response to the last command. On the other hand, gcc v2.95.3 had

Hi all, I have trouble to compile Matrix packages on Solar10 x86-64 with Sun compilers. I saw some postings on this but am not sure how to solve this problem. It is becoming critical as I cannot install biocLite() because of its dependency on Matrix. Could you direct me how to resolve the issue? Thanks in advance! Dongseok R version 2.8.1 (2008-12-22) Copyright (C) 2008 The R Foundation for

System details: -------------- Sun Blade 1000, Solaris 8, Sun ONE Compiler Suite (rebranded Forte 7), R versions 1.6.0 and 1.6.2 - suspect others are affected, too Problem description: ------------------- Using the recommended env var setting from p.15 of the Admin Guide, the configure script fails the sgemm sunperf test, even though the sunperf libraries are available Not linking with

Full_Name: Bob Bownes Version: 2.9.2 OS: Solaris 10 Submission from: (NULL) (164.55.254.106) The sed lines in src/unix/Makefile confuse the grep distributed with Solaris that gets configured by ./configure. Switching from a separator of ':' to a separator of ',' fixes the problem. 76,77c76,77 < @$(SED) -e "s:@rhome:$(rhome):" -e

I have just installed R 1.9.1 on an old Sun Sparc with the following specs: version Machine hardware: sun4u OS version: 5.6 Processor type: sparc Hardware: SUNW,Ultra-4 The following components are installed on your system: Sun Visual WorkShop C++ 3.0 Sun WorkShop Compiler C 4.2 Sun WorkShop Compiler C++ 4.2 Sun WorkShop Tools.h++ 7.0

Hello. I have been trying to check, how llvm works on Solaris recently. First I have tested lli, whitch seems to execute the bytecode generated on Linux without any problems. However, llc has failed to generate valid SPARC assembler code even on the helloworld example. Here is the generated code: sakharov at trillian:~$ cat ./test.s .text .align 16 .globl main

R Help List: Just curious if anyone has successfully built R on a SPARC platform running Sun Solaris 10 using the latest Sun Studio 12 set of compilers. If so, I would be interested in the compile flags that you used. I have tried several different builds of version 2.5.1, 2.6.0, and 2.6.1 using various different compile flags and I am able to compile and check, but for whatever reason, the

Apologies if this is not the best list on which to ask for help. I have compiled R 2.6.0 using Sun Studio 12 compilers. I can install most CRAN and bioconductor packages that I need, with the exception of RSQLite. Unfortunately this is critical for other packages that I need. I have tried to compile it using R CMD INSTALL to generate a config.log file. I don't know how to fix the reported