similar to: new optimized BLAS

Yesterday I ported FLAME to OS X (http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/flame/index.html). FLAME is a system to automatically (currently semi-automatically) generate efficient and correct linear algebra routines in C or MATLAB or MPI from descriptions of the algorithms. It uses code that relies heavily on partitioning of matrices, and avoids indices as much as possible. There are a number of

hi all, trying my first foray into testing and having trouble with accessing the fixture instance variable built a test for my NewsRelease model. have a news_releases.yml as a fixture with: first: id: 1 title: my first release body: this is still my first test of a news release publish: 0 date_publication: 2006-06-06 17:28:00 in news_release_test.rb, i have def setup

Sorry for not responding earlier. On 05/20/2016 03:05 PM, Roman Gareev wrote: > Thank you very much for the advices! I could probably try to avoid > using of nonhardware prefetching in the project, if Tobias doesn’t > disagree with it. My understanding is that prefetching isn’t used > explicitly in [1] and, according to [2], in some cases 90% of the > turbo boost peak of the

2016-05-19 21:45 GMT+05:00 4lbert C0hen <4lbert.h.c0hen at gmail.com>: > One short note. I would advise against spending time on prefetching for x86. > Recent hardware prefetchers are amazingly good at strided accesses in > single-threaded code. Caution: this is not based on objective/published > data, but on personal experience. > > There are open challenges in

As a few of you will know, Dr Goto's BLAS is now available again (http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/resources/software/software.php), but only for academic use and only for Linux (at least in binary form, and source-code licenses are not yet available). http://www.netlib.org/lapack pointed me to AMD's ACML (http://www.amd.com/acml). This has a less restrictive licence, and seems at least

Hi, I am trying to build R 2.2.1 with Kazushige Goto's BLAS library (libgoto) and encountered a problem: I have two computers with the almost identical hardware (P4 Northwood CPU, i875 chipset, 2GB DDR400 RAM) and identical Linux OS. I have the latest version of libgoto for this CPU installed on both boxes (libgoto_northwood32p-r1.00.so) and I am using gcc compiler flags "-O2

On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 13:21 +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > 2015-06-08 13:09 GMT+02:00 Bastien Nocera <hadess at hadess.net>: > > On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 10:13 +0200, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > -ATTRS{idVendor}=="06da", ENV{UPOWER_VENDOR}="Liebert" > > > > > > +ATTRS{idVendor}=="06da",

Hi Tobias, according to [1], we can expect 90% of the turbo boost peak of the processor with a C version of Matrix-Matrix Multiplication that is similar to the one presented in [1]. In case of Intel Core i7-3820 SandyBridge, the theoretical maximal performance of the machine is 28.8 gflops and hence the expected number is 25,92 gflops. However, in case of, for example, n = m = 1056 and k = 1024

Hi, i know, that i maybe break all rules regarding mailing lists etc, but I hope, I can get an answer from you for this question: Is there an API do received the current listed stations? We want to implement Icecast into a audioplayer and for that we have to download the current stations list (is that allowed?) So I?m searching similar function like Shoutcast offers: Description: Get

Greeting All Can any one help me figure out the size of the ARC tail, i.e, the portion in ARC that l2_feed thread is reading from before pages are evicted from ARC. Is the size of this tail proportional to total ARC size ? L2ARC device size ? is tunable ?????? your feed back is highly appreciated -- Abdullah Al-Dahlawi PhD Candidate George Washington University Department. Of

Greeting ALL Can someone explain to me why I was successfully able issue (through application) an I/Os of 128K each (monitored by DTrace) while my Maxphys=56K only ?????? My understanding is that Maxphys is the max I/O size that the storage device can handle for a single I/O, it has been well documented that if and application issued an I/O larger than Maxphys, it would be break down to

Hello, My name is Ronaldo Saheki and I work as sysadmin using CentOS in a wide range of system configurations: scientific workstations with 3d stereoscopic monitor/goggles, one of the former top100 clusters (top500.org) in 2005 (trindade) that runs on CentOS 4.7, and several servers and applications servers at Petrobras. CentOS is the official linux distro for workstation and servers at

On 10/30/18 2:46 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> On 10/29/18 1:55 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>> To me it seems like, if they are smart, they will try to push IBM POWER >>> and RedHat Linux together to establish real competition in the hardware >>> market again (and of course don't forget to keep Fedora/CentOS alive)! >> Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a

On 2018-10-30 02:46, Simon Matter wrote: >> On 10/29/18 1:55 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>> To me it seems like, if they are smart, they will try to push IBM >>> POWER >>> and RedHat Linux together to establish real competition in the >>> hardware >>> market again (and of course don't forget to keep Fedora/CentOS >>> alive)! >>

Greeting ALL I understand that L2ARC is still under enhancement. Does any one know if ZFS can be upgrades to include "Persistent L2ARC", ie. L2ARC will not loose its contents after system reboot ? -- Abdullah Al-Dahlawi George Washington University Department. Of Electrical & Computer Engineering ---- Check The Fastest 500 Super Computers Worldwide

> On 2018-10-30 02:46, Simon Matter wrote: >>> On 10/29/18 1:55 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>> To me it seems like, if they are smart, they will try to push IBM >>>> POWER >>>> and RedHat Linux together to establish real competition in the >>>> hardware >>>> market again (and of course don't forget to keep Fedora/CentOS

On 10/30/18 3:20 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: > On 30/10/18 20:06, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote: >> >> On 10/30/18 2:46 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>> On 10/29/18 1:55 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>>> To me it seems like, if they are smart, they will try to push IBM >>>>> POWER >>>>> and RedHat Linux together to establish real

On 30/10/18 20:06, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote: > > On 10/30/18 2:46 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>> On 10/29/18 1:55 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >>>> To me it seems like, if they are smart, they will try to push IBM >>>> POWER >>>> and RedHat Linux together to establish real competition in the >>>> hardware >>>> market again

> On 10/29/18 1:55 AM, Simon Matter wrote: >> To me it seems like, if they are smart, they will try to push IBM POWER >> and RedHat Linux together to establish real competition in the hardware >> market again (and of course don't forget to keep Fedora/CentOS alive)! > > Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a very long time. The fastest > supercomputer in the

Dear all, I am currently trying to link R 2.1.0 to the GOTO BLAS 0.99.3 library on a box running Fedora Core 3 , basically following the steps indicated in the R-Admin document: 1: I downloaded the current libgoto.xxx.so from http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kgoto/libraries/libgoto_prescott-32-r0.99-3.so.gz, a version suitable for our XEON machine (Nocona core), unpacked it to /usr/lib and created