similar to: Re: Mailman password for R-help (and R-*) mailing lists?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Re: Mailman password for R-help (and R-*) mailing lists?"

2002 Nov 14
2
R mailing lists: move from majordomo to [procmail+mailman]
We have locally collected good experience the last few weeks using procmail-spam filtering, inclduing spamassassin to the procmail filters. The last two spams that went past the majordomo filters (the "traditional ones I've been using) through to R-devel both were not delivered to me, be but caught by the filters. I have now collected a bit more of a week experience using the new scheme
2004 Mar 25
0
R/ESS/Bioc* mailing lists: 2 hour time out -- 6 hours from now
This is (hopefully) a "once in ten years" event, happening today, from 17--19 CET (= 16--18 UTC = 11--13 US Eastern == 8--10 US Pacific Time) The main `vault' (security, air condition,..) where our mail server hypatia is located will undergo a major `network re-connection' event that will affect a considerable part of ETH -- including all the mailing lists
2003 Nov 24
0
R Mailing lists: "Sender:" now sometimes VERPs
{BCC'ed to three Core groups} Following the recommendation of the mailman developers, I have activated occasional "VERP"ing for our mailing lists. (and will turn it off again, after about a day or so). Here is the mailman "comment-docu" on this : # These variables control the format and frequency of VERP-like delivery for # better bounce detection. VERP is Variable
2002 Jan 31
0
R-help & -devel mailing lists : indigestion problems
Because of a lapsus on my side and then a problematic server re-boot at just the wrong time, the daily digest versions of the R mailing lists (see the lower part of http://www.r-project.org/mail.html) haven't been delivered in time, unfortunately. I'm sending this message just *before* starting the digest manually for today. I hope this won't happen anymore. Apropos, I'd like to
2002 Nov 26
3
R-announce moved from majordomo to [procmail+mailman]
I have moved the R-announce mailing list from the Majordomo software to a combination of procmail & mailman an hour or so ago. You find a link in the footer of this message giving an URL where you can modify your subscription, look at the archives (everything from the beginning in 1997) and more. CHANGE: Postings to R-announce are now moderated, ie. they have to be approved by a list
2002 Nov 26
3
R-announce moved from majordomo to [procmail+mailman]
I have moved the R-announce mailing list from the Majordomo software to a combination of procmail & mailman an hour or so ago. You find a link in the footer of this message giving an URL where you can modify your subscription, look at the archives (everything from the beginning in 1997) and more. CHANGE: Postings to R-announce are now moderated, ie. they have to be approved by a list
2003 Sep 15
0
Fourth R Mailing List : "R-packages"
We (mainly the R core team) have been discussing the creation of another R mailing list, with the goal to fill the gap between R-help very high volume, with its great merits, but.... and R-announce only for R important announcements (mostly R-core) hence __MODERATED__ and *very* low volume, and hence highly recommended for almost all users of R. *** all messages are forwarded
2003 Sep 15
0
Fourth R Mailing List : "R-packages"
We (mainly the R core team) have been discussing the creation of another R mailing list, with the goal to fill the gap between R-help very high volume, with its great merits, but.... and R-announce only for R important announcements (mostly R-core) hence __MODERATED__ and *very* low volume, and hence highly recommended for almost all users of R. *** all messages are forwarded
2003 Sep 26
2
Spam-Filter @stat.math.ethz.ch: was dead for about 15 hours
As many of you have probably realized, the spam filtering at @stat.math.ethz.ch has been dead for since yesterday (09-25) ~16:50 till today ~08:30. The sudden death may have been caused by unrelated installation of some perl modules (spamassassin *is* running on perl) by our IT staff. We are very sorry for this event. On the bright side: You have been able to get a glimpse of what you are
2004 Apr 06
0
Accuracy Bug (PR#1228), (PR#6743)
>>>>> "daheiser" == daheiser <daheiser@gvn.net> >>>>> on Tue, 6 Apr 2004 04:24:35 +0200 (CEST) writes: daheiser> It is an error in the algorithm. "it" being the behavior reported in bug report PR#1228 --- [too bad you didn't use the whole string "PR#1228" in your subject; if you had, no new report would have
2003 Sep 11
1
rank(*) with NAs -- new option "keep" desired
In some contexts, I find the current behavior of rank() very `suboptimal'. We have the argument na.last = {TRUE | FALSE | NA } where the first two cases treating NAs (almost) as if they were == +Inf or == -Inf whereas the 3rd case just drops NAs. For the typical ``Rank Transformation'' that is recommended in EDA in several contexts, I would however want something else, namely keep
2003 Dec 13
0
chisq.test() and r2dtable() freezing on certain inputs (PR#5701)
>>>>> "MM" == Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch> >>>>> on Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:29:05 +0100 (CET) writes: >>>>> "Torsten" == Torsten Hothorn <torsten@hothorn.de> >>>>> on Thu, 11 Dec 2003 18:03:07 +0100 (CET) writes: Torsten> On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Jeffrey Chang wrote:
2002 Aug 05
0
Re: [S] Multinomial
>>>>> "Jacob" == Jacob van Wyk <jlvw at rau.ac.za> writes: Jacob> Could anybody please help: I simply want to generate Jacob> random samples from a multinomial distribution with Jacob> fixed n and given probability vector p. Jacob> How can I do this? I've recently written the following {for the R package "normix"}. The
2002 Oct 01
0
Delayed (and doubled) R-help mails
During the last 24 hours or so, quite a few e-mails have been delayed for the R-help (and in one case the R-announce) mailing lists. The double posting of "New version of ipred package" to R-announce is my fault, not the posters. I apologize for all inconveniences. The reason is a mail server upgrade and reconfiguration. This should all be past now and the delayed mail hopefully soon
2004 Jan 03
0
error "evaluation nested too deeply" {was "Heatmap"}
I'm diverting this to the more appropriate mailing list, R-help, since heatmap() is standard R function. >>>>> "Johan" == Johan Lindberg <johanl at kiev.biotech.kth.se> >>>>> on Fri, 02 Jan 2004 10:04:14 +0100 writes: Johan> I am trying to plot a matrix of m-values in a heatmap Johan> with "average linkage". The rows
2002 Sep 09
0
Re: [S] First max of a vector
>>>>> "MikeM" == Michael M Meyer <mikem at salter-point.com> >>>>> on Sat, 07 Sep 2002 18:40:01 -0700 writes: MikeM> which(x==max(x)) will return the indices fo all MikeM> elements that are equal to the max. So the first max MikeM> would be which(x==max(x))[1] (At least this works in MikeM> R, I assume it does in
2002 Mar 22
0
Rdconv -> HTML bug {was ... `las' on `par' help...} (PR#1257)
>>>>> "Achim" == Achim Zeileis <zeileis@ci.tuwien.ac.at> writes: Achim> Just a small documentation bug: something went wrong Achim> for the description of the graphical parameter `las' Achim> on the HTML version of the `par' help page: `las' is Achim> missing and instead a line from the description is Achim> used.
2002 Apr 22
1
predict.*bSpline() bugs extrapolating for deriv >= 1 (PR#1473)
I've already fixed the bugs, but as with the last one, this is not critical enough to allow breaking current R-devel's code freeze. I hope I will have corrected it for 1.5.1.. ## Here is code reproducing the problems; ## I use try(.) whenever I know the current versions of R would ## give an error: library(splines) x <- c(1:3,5:6) y <- c(3:1,5:6) (isP <- interpSpline(x,y))#
2002 May 14
0
RE: cut.dendrogram (PR#1552)
>>>>> "MikG" == M GRUM <M.GRUM@CGIAR.ORG> writes: MikG> I'm resending this bug report with a new example. As MikG> seen below, cut.dendrogram gives an error message for MikG> some heights, but not for others and with some MikG> datasets adn not others. I can't see why. MikG> Last time I unwittingly sent my message with
2002 Jun 17
1
logicals in data frames -- as.data.frame() should allow them
Currently, as.data.frame() , i.e., at least its "matrix" method, still coerces logicals to factors. I think this is not desired and not according to the changes to read.table() for R 1.4.0 which allow logicals. Does anybody see a reason against a change which would allow logical matrices to become data.frames with logical variables ? Martin Maechler <maechler@stat.math.ethz.ch>