similar to: Detecting numerical value in character variable

"An Introduction to R", Venables and Smith, Version 1.6.2 (2003-01-10) http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-intro.pdf has in its "Appendix A: A sample session", page 81, file.show("morley.tab") I get the response NO FILE morley.tab The following "Introduction to the R Project for Statistical Computing" www.itc.nl/~rossiter/teach/sstat14/

I get great flexibility with command-line editing through the "readline" library in the "bash" editor and the "ncftp" tool. S-Plus has this editing and I see in the preliminary "Notes on R: A Programming Environment for Data Analysis and Graphics", page 65, that "R -e" might give this functionality. Typically, one can use either vi or emacs

Hi all, I hope this is the correct list to post such a question. I was trying to install the R-project on Debian and encountered significant problems with the same. The main problem is the installation of the libc6 package. I need this package in order to install the R-core package. However, the libc6 is dependent on the libdb1-compat package, which just refuses to install on my server.

By any chance are there any free checkbook apps that have been written for Ruby? Looking to free myself from Gnucash/Grisbi/Quicken but don''t quite have the skills/time to make my own app. Has anyone done this and want to share? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi everyone. : ) I meet problem when use form tag in actionmailer. (content-type is text/html, surely) I want to use form action in actionmailer''s view (.rhtml) for some reason. 1. I use start_form_tag helper method as normally, but how I can ? I did <%= start_form_tag :action => "http://myhostname/mycontroller/myaction" %> or <%= start_form_tag :action =>

I have the data similar to the following in a data frame: LastName Department Salary 1 Johnson IT 56000 2 James HR 54223 3 Howe Finance 80000 4 Jones Finance 82000 5 Norwood IT 67000 6 Benson Sales 76000 7 Smith Sales 65778 8 Baker HR 56778 9 Dempsey HR 78999 10 Nolan

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19622 Summary: 9100m G card (for acer aspire 4350) Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

I don't think it's especially hard, but just not specifically unimplemented because nobody's had a strong need for it. There's probably some combinations of code models and machines that does happen to work (e.g. emutls+linux+large-code+large-data+no-PIC). Julia has some support for thread locals, but as a JIT in control of the language we currently try to generate better code than

Hi This is a question regarding classification performance using different methods. So far I've tried NaiveBayes (klaR package), svm (e1071) package and randomForest (randomForest). What has puzzled me is that randomForest seems to perform far better (32% classification error) than svm and NaiveBayes, which have similar classification errors (45%, 48% respectively). A similar difference in

I'm currently looking to interconnect my Asterisk PBX system with the PSTN via a digital PRI/T1. I know a multitude of options exist for internal PCI cards (Digium/Sangoma/Rhino), I was wondering if anyone has any experience or recommendations of external PRI media gateways that support SIP. So far I've found: VegaStream Vega 400 Audiocodes Mediant 2000 MediaTrix 1531 However they are

I'm setting up a new domain with Samba 3.0.30 as the PDC using the tdbsam backend. 'net group' yields an empty list, which is consistent with the cautious appoach that Samba takes: don't do anything automagically. But, a new Windows PDC will come online with several well-known domain users and groups. Did I miss the step where I run some stock script that creates these expected

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > and since result of *it is considered to be rvalue it can't be accepted > > by this operator. The complete discussion is in > > > > http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1385.htm > > > > I'd suggest to apply the following patch which makes operator* return >

Hi Jeremy, Thanks so much for your reply! As a matter of fact, we did just that around 3:45p yesterday when our CTDB cluster was unable to self-heal from the latest in this series of failover events. Here's how the situation went down: 1) We saw flapping identical to that described in my original post 2) After about 30 minutes of waiting, CTDB was just spinning with `smbd` repeatedly

I'm currently looking to deploy an Asterisk server using an FXO media gateway to connect to the PSTN and was looking for any user experiences that may aid in selecting a gateway. Specifically i'm looking for a 4-port model under 500 dollars. Within this category exists: MediaTrix 1204 Grandstream GXW-4104 AudioCodes MP114 I've read over Voip-info.org regarding these products and

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Yea, I've noticed that. However, it looks like inst_iterator is iterator over > pointers. Oh, wait a minite, that's the current code: > > inline IIty operator*() const { return BI; } > inline IIty operator->() const { return operator*(); } > > So operator* works as if value_type is Instruction*, but operator->

Historically? I implemented support for exceptions back in LLVM 3.3, before LLVM had an implementation of a Windows unwinder. Currently? As recent as LLVM 4.0, I don't think the JIT was fully capable of handling COFF files, and LLVM wouldn't emit the correct sections (with the COFF-formatted unwind tables) when used in ELF mode. The prolog is known to be standard since Julia disables FPO

Let me clarify. These aren’t intended to be exposed to the user. The user code that leads to the generation of these intrinsics will be normal floating point operations combined with either pragmas (such as “STDC FENV_ACCESS ON”) or command line options (such as the recently introduced “-fp-model=strict”). The reason I’ve been avoiding normal constant values is that it provides no information when

I agree with the others that this seems great! I think this information can be super helpful for users both in learning and skimming assembly codes. As a maintainer of a LLVM frontend (JuliaLang), I'm additionally interested in whether some bits of this make sense to end up in libLLVM itself. Probably especially the collection code pieces. For context, I've previously written some code to

We really have been trying to keep in mind that LLVM needs to support multiple front ends, which may be implementing different language standards. As much as possible, I’ve been trying to let the IEEE 754 spec drive my thinking about this, though I’ll admit that on a few points I’ve use the C99 spec as a sort of reference interpretation of IEEE 754. LLVM’s IRBuilder has been recently updated to

Hi Connor, ...The LLVM documentation has a page at > llvm.org/docs/DebuggingJITedCode.html > showing an example of using gdb to debug MCJIT’ed code, but has no mention > of ORC JIT. What debugging support MCJIT has is provided by the RuntimeDyld utility, which ORC shares. I would expect anything in that document to apply to ORC as well, though I haven't tested it personally.