Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "How to ask smart questions (was RE: [S] A plea (was RE: [S] Diffe rences between UNIX and PC)"
2003 Aug 11
3
Plea for Help with Slow Roaming Profiles
I've posted a couple of times about this problem. This is a plea for help
with Roaming Profile configuration.
The short problem is that logging on and logging off takes about ten
minutes, with a fresh roaming profile (~1MB), on a 100Mb LAN.
If anyone has any suggestions or pointers or questions, *please* pipe up.
I'm all out of ideas.
2011 Jun 02
4
[Plea to the R Gods] Theoretical and Empirical CDFs
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n3567636/ecdfs.jpg ecdfs.jpg
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/file/n3567636/ecdf_curve.gif ecdf_curve.gif
Hello,
I have generated a plot of two empirical CDFs (attachment 1). As a result,
they are stepwise when plotted. The following code was used:
> plot(ecdf(mut), do.points=FALSE, verticals=TRUE, xlim=range(mut, non),
> col="red")
>
2005 Sep 28
0
responses to my question on non-central t
The original question is attached at the end of this message ...
In the world of R the excellent mvtnorm package answers my original
question and many more that I didn't know I needed to ask.
In the world of Splus ( version 6 , Windows XP ) this link :-
http://www.biostat.wustl.edu/archives/html/s-news/2002-11/msg00079.html
which was provided by Dimitris Rizopoulos, is useful.
2002 Feb 21
0
Re: [S] Splus vs. R & Linux vs. Windows
--- "Paul, David A" <paulda at BATTELLE.ORG> wrote:
> Four questions:
>
> (1) Is Splus faster (on a PC) under Linux than under
> Windows? I am
> specifically thinking of intensive loops here, but
> would also
> solicit
> information regarding how Splus stores information
> within the Linux
> system vx. Windows
>
> (2) Can Splus under
2003 Oct 17
1
RE: [S] Dynamic Memory Allocation in R
> From: Gamal Abdel-Azim [mailto:gamal at crinet.com]
>
> While trying to expand the memory/object size in R, I noticed
> that R might be using
> only heap memory. Is this true? Are all objects in R created
> in the heap not
> allocated? It's not logical that this is the case!! Otherwise
> the whole R project would
> be a total waste of time and resources.
2007 Feb 06
3
installing packages and windows vista
I installed R (R-2.4.1-win32.exe) on a new computer with Windows Vista
and a 64 bit operating system (hp dv9000 with intel core t7200). The
base R runs fine, but I can not get any of the packages to load. From
within R I choose install packages choose a site then a package. I
tried installing 2 packages and get similar errors (see below), I just
copied and pasted lines from R.
Can anyone
2004 Jun 29
1
RE: [S] Different behaviour of unique(), R vs. Splus.
The source of the incompatibility:
In S-PLUS 6.2:
> methods("unique")
splus splus menu splus
"unique.data.frame" "unique.default" "unique.name" "unique.rowcol.names"
In R-1.9.1:
> methods("unique")
[1] unique.array unique.data.frame unique.default unique.matrix
2004 May 05
2
[LLVMdev] Plea for help
Chris Lattner wrote:
>Could you try compiling and running this program:
>
>---
>#include <limits>
>#include <iostream>
>int main() {
> std::cerr << std::numeric_limits<float>::infinity() << "\n";
>}
>---
>
>
Sure thing. It prints "0". Calling that inifinity is somewhat
of a stretch, isn't it ?
What on earth
2004 May 05
0
[LLVMdev] Plea for help
On Wed, 5 May 2004, Finn S Andersen wrote:
> Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> >Could you try compiling and running this program:
> >
> >---
> >#include <limits>
> >#include <iostream>
> >int main() {
> > std::cerr << std::numeric_limits<float>::infinity() << "\n";
> >}
> >---
> >
> >
> Sure
2004 May 06
0
[LLVMdev] Plea for help
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 04:06:27PM +0200, Finn S Andersen wrote:
> Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> >I think that we should switch to C constants in this case. Can you try
> >#include <math.h> and use HUGE_VAL instead?
> >
> It works:
>
> [finna at coplin11 ~/test]$ cat tst.cpp
> #include <limits>
> #include <iostream>
> #include
2004 May 06
1
[LLVMdev] Plea for help
Alkis Evlogimenos wrote:
>As for CVS, I am not sure this should be fixed because there is
>really no LLVM bug here :-)
>
>
>
No, you are right. But perhaps it is worth it to mention the problem
somewhere in the documentation, because there appear to be many
installations with this problem (I've found 3: my home installation,
my work and the nearest university), and it is
2004 May 06
2
[LLVMdev] Plea for help
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Alkis Evlogimenos wrote:
> > But making the consequential changes in LLVM seems trickier.
> > Do you plan to correct it in CVS, or is there a path I can follow
> > to fix it myself on my own installation ?
>
> The easy way to do it in your area is to replace all occurences of
> std::numeric_limits<float>::infinity() with HUGE_VAL. The only two
2004 May 07
0
[LLVMdev] Plea for help
Chris Lattner wrote:
>While this is not an LLVM bug, if Finn has run into it, other people
>probably will too. I've fixed it in CVS: if you update llvm/lib/CodeGen
>and rebuild, hopefully linscan will magically work for Finn now. :)
>
>-Chris
>
>
It works. Even better: it isn't magic ;-)
Thank you for helping me out. Now it's time to play :)
Best regards
/Finn
2013 Dec 04
0
Plea for a more loquacious nut
Roger Price wrote, On 12/4/2013 12:35 PM:
> I would like nut to become more loquacious, and to log a much more
> complete report of its activity. At present nut reports that its
> components have started operation but does not automatically log their
> activity when UPS's switch between OB and OL. I believe that this
> under-reporting of important facts is too minimalist -
2000 Aug 01
0
AllowHosts implementation plea.
Hello all,
I'd like to see sshd_config directive AllowHosts implemented. This is
about the only SSH 1.2.27 (etc.) thing not supported by OpenSSH.
The reason for this would be drop-in compatibility. Sure, you can do
about the same thing with hosts.allow, but the syntax is a bit different
and you'd have to modify sshd_config and you lose the possibility to have
multiple security layers
2006 Jan 26
0
Plea to support a much needed function for Call Centers in Asterisk.
I have contacted Digium and have received a quote of $7,000US to
implement what I will refer to as 'whisper mode'.
It will allow a person to speak to only one side of a bridged call. For
example, I am using ChanSpy to listen to an agent and what they are
hearing and saying. But I cannot tell the agent something, without
calling them on another line. This wil allow you to speak to your
2016 Nov 15
0
Clients can't write to group-writable files - plea for help
On 11/14/16 6:32 PM, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:38:52AM -0500, Josh Malone via samba wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> Apologies for basically bumping my own thread, but I'm absolutely at
>> my wits' end trying to figure out this access problem. I've
>> replicated the issue with and without NFS being involved. On our old
>>
2016 Nov 16
0
Clients can't write to group-writable files - plea for help
On 11/15/16 7:25 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>
> The token is the list of uids/gids (or SIDs in Windows terms)
> that this smbd is using to represent the user right now.
Okay - that makes sense. Thank you.
>>
>> canon_ace index 0. Type = allow SID = S-1-22-1-0 uid 0 (root)
>> SMB_ACL_USER_OBJ ace_flags = 0x0 perms rwx
>> canon_ace index 1. Type = allow SID =
2016 Nov 16
1
Clients can't write to group-writable files - plea for help
On 11/16/16 8:44 AM, Josh Malone via samba wrote:
>
> Okay - so it's getting the right values for my user, but coming up with
> the wrong permissions on the file I'm trying to access. Any idea why?
>
> I've been trying to debug this for days now - every build I make on Red
> Hat Enterprise 6 does this. However, running Samba under Ubuntu server
> behaves correctly
2016 Nov 16
0
Clients can't write to group-writable files - plea for help
On 11/16/16 2:32 PM, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote:
>>
>> But the file is not root:root - it's owned by uid 12477 and group
>> 9006. Why is Samba getting the wrong owner/group for this file?
>
> That is the core of your problem. What does the full debug level 10
> log say around this message ?
>
Nothing that I can see.
In any case, I've resolved my issue.