similar to: Tukey multiple comparisons

Dear all, I'm using R to perform multiple comparison testing on agriculture genotype trials. To perform the Duncan's MRT, I use the qtukey() function with the following syntax: qtukey(p = ((1 - 0.05) ^ (pos - 1)), nmeans = pos, df = ni) I experience a strange behaviour when the number of means in the trial and the number of residual degrees of freedom (ni) becomes high

Well, it is clear enough that the problem is in interpreting the documentation. However, when you claim you tested something, and found it inconsistent with tables, it would be advisable to back it up with examples! The description in the help files and in the sources is admittedly confusing. The original paper has this, rather more clear, description in the abstract: "We consider the

I am using R 1.1 with Redhat 6.2 and RW 1.001 with Win98 (the upkey doesn't work on my IBM either as has been previously reported by others). The function aov doesn't return either the residuals or the residual degrees of freedom for split-plot designs. If you use the following code from Baron and Li's "Notes on the use of R for psycology experiments and questionnaires"

I am not sure if my message made it through, so here it is again! Hi Rer's, R-1.1.0 I have two questions for you: 1) I am trying to complete a multiple comparison test after completing a one-way ANOVA on some data. I think this is pretty reasonable. aov(MetricSubset ~ GeneNameFactor) works pairwise.t.test(MetricSubset,GeneNameSubset,p.adjuxt.method=bonferroni,p ool.sd=FALSE)

Dear all, I wanted to compare Bonferroni vs TukeyHSD correction over a range of groups and group sizes, and wanted to use the function qtukey. In the help documentation it says qtukey(p, nmeans, df, nranges = 1, lower.tail = TRUE, log.p = FALSE) Arguments q vector of quantiles. p vector of probabilities. nmeans sample size for range (same for each group). df degrees of freedom for s (see

We cannot help you understand what you are doing if you do not show us what you are doing. Here are some discussions about how to communicate questions about R [1][2][3]. [1] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5963269/how-to-make-a-great-r-reproducible-example [2] http://adv-r.had.co.nz/Reproducibility.html [3] https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/reprex/index.html -- Sent from my phone.

(1) ...need to speed up a monte-carlo sampling...any suggestions about how I can get R to use all 8 cores of a mac pro would be most useful and very appreciated... (2) spent the last few hours trying to get pnmath to compile under os- x 10.5.4... using gcc version 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5553) as downloaded from CRAN, xcode 3.0... ...xcode 3.1 installed over top of above after

I want to create a grid of function values for use in `contour' or `persp'. The function is the log-likelihood for the gamma. The sample is stored as vector of length 20 called `Survival'. A single evaluation of the log-likelihood at, say, scale = 9 and shape = 10 would be obtained by sum(dgamma(Survival, scale = 9, shape = 10, log = TRUE)) (This may work only 0.99.0, I'm not

Hi, I'm building Tukey's table using qtukey function. It happens that I can't get the values of Tukey's one degree of freedom and also wanted to eliminate the first column. The program is: Trat <- c(1:30) # number of treatments gl <- c(1:30, 40, 60, 120) # degree freedom tukval <- matrix(0, nr=length(gl), nc=length(Trat)) for(i in

Hi, All: ** My previous email on this subject seemed to contain an error; check the correction: Is there a function in R to compute the expected range of a sample of size n from some distribution? I ask, because I was recently asked about the control chart constant 'd2', which is the expected range for a sample of size n from a standard normal. There is a fairly simple

I am not sure whether it is a design decision or just an oversight. When I ask for the standard errors of the predictions with predict(budwm.lgt,se=TRUE) where budwm.lgt is a logistic fit of the budworm data in MASS, I got Error in match.arg(type) : ARG should be one of response, terms If one is to construct a CI for the fitted binomial probability, wouldn't it be more natural to do

Dear R-developeRs, Attached follows a patch against svn 34959 that adds the printing of p-values to the TukeyHSD.aov function in stats package. I also updated the corresponding documentation file and added a 'see also' reference to the simint function of the multcomp package. As it was already brought up in a previous thread [1] in R-help, one can obtain the adjusted

On a recent FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) building R (any version) breaks with the following messages: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [...snip...] gcc -std=gnu99 -I. -I../../src/include -I../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -c wilcox.c -o wilcox.o gcc -std=gnu99 -I. -I../../src/include -I../../src/include -I/usr/local/include

Full_Name: James MacKinnon Version: Version 1.0.0 OS: Debian 2.1 Submission from: (NULL) (24.141.113.138) I am a novice at R, so I am not totally sure that this is a bug, but I think it must be. When I type help.start() or ?help, Netscape starts up, as it should, but it displays my normal home page, not any help for R. The relevant documents exist in /usr/lib/R/doc/html, but Netscape does not

Dear R-users, I am working to install Chong Gu's new gss library on my Linux system (Redhat 5.1/i386), and have run into the following roadblock: Dr. Gu's R code is a front end for a package of Fortran routines called RKPACK. While I have no trouble compiling the individual bits of Fortran code with fort77 in Linux, I don't know how to link the resulting *.o files into a shared

I am writing course notes in LaTeX. In the part where I am describing model-fitting functions in R I want to use a ~ character inline. If I am displaying an example of R code in its own environment I use the alltt environment, which protects the ~ character. I have forgotten how to protect the ~ when I am writing something like The operator `~' is used to define a model formula in \R.

# R for Windows will not send your bug report automatically. # Please copy the bug report (after finishing it) to # your favorite email program and send it to # # r-bugs at r-project.org # ###################################################### This report is joint from Richard Heiberger <rmh at temple.edu> and Burt Holland <bholland at temple.edu>. Burt Holland is the coauthor

Hello, I am trying to determine the most appropriate way to run post-hoc comparisons on my lme model. I had originally planned to use Tukey HSD method as I am interested in all possible comparisons between my treatment levels. TukeyHSD, however, does not work with lme. The only other code that I was able to find, and which also seems to be widely used, is glht specified with Tukey:

Hi, I'm trying to make sense of the options for multiple comparisons options in R. I've found the following options: pairwise.t.test, which provides standard t-tests, with options for choosing an appropriate correction for multiple comparisons TukeyHSD, which provides the usual Tukey test glht(package multcomp), which provides a variety of options >From the help list, it appears

I am trying to do a Nonparametric Tukey-type multiple comparison post-hoc test to determine which groups are significantly different. I have read the dialogue on this topic from the R-help, and am still not clear why no statistical packages include this test as an option? Is it not an appropriate test to conduct on non-normally distributed data? Is the only option to calculate it by hand