similar to: R-beta: command-line editing not working in Debian Linux version

I have a variable that can have either numeric or character values. When numeric, I take one action; when not-numeric, I take another action. Unfortunately, my approaches are awkward, so I look for others' approaches. To detect a numeric value, I have semi-successfully used two appoaches. I somewhat simplify here using direct character values like "123" rather than a variable. 1.

"An Introduction to R", Venables and Smith, Version 1.6.2 (2003-01-10) http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-intro.pdf has in its "Appendix A: A sample session", page 81, file.show("morley.tab") I get the response NO FILE morley.tab The following "Introduction to the R Project for Statistical Computing" www.itc.nl/~rossiter/teach/sstat14/

Hi all, I hope this is the correct list to post such a question. I was trying to install the R-project on Debian and encountered significant problems with the same. The main problem is the installation of the libc6 package. I need this package in order to install the R-core package. However, the libc6 is dependent on the libdb1-compat package, which just refuses to install on my server.

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19622 Summary: 9100m G card (for acer aspire 4350) Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

I don't think it's especially hard, but just not specifically unimplemented because nobody's had a strong need for it. There's probably some combinations of code models and machines that does happen to work (e.g. emutls+linux+large-code+large-data+no-PIC). Julia has some support for thread locals, but as a JIT in control of the language we currently try to generate better code than

I'm currently looking to interconnect my Asterisk PBX system with the PSTN via a digital PRI/T1. I know a multitude of options exist for internal PCI cards (Digium/Sangoma/Rhino), I was wondering if anyone has any experience or recommendations of external PRI media gateways that support SIP. So far I've found: VegaStream Vega 400 Audiocodes Mediant 2000 MediaTrix 1531 However they are

Hi Jeremy, Thanks so much for your reply! As a matter of fact, we did just that around 3:45p yesterday when our CTDB cluster was unable to self-heal from the latest in this series of failover events. Here's how the situation went down: 1) We saw flapping identical to that described in my original post 2) After about 30 minutes of waiting, CTDB was just spinning with `smbd` repeatedly

Hi This is a question regarding classification performance using different methods. So far I've tried NaiveBayes (klaR package), svm (e1071) package and randomForest (randomForest). What has puzzled me is that randomForest seems to perform far better (32% classification error) than svm and NaiveBayes, which have similar classification errors (45%, 48% respectively). A similar difference in

I'm currently looking to deploy an Asterisk server using an FXO media gateway to connect to the PSTN and was looking for any user experiences that may aid in selecting a gateway. Specifically i'm looking for a 4-port model under 500 dollars. Within this category exists: MediaTrix 1204 Grandstream GXW-4104 AudioCodes MP114 I've read over Voip-info.org regarding these products and

Historically? I implemented support for exceptions back in LLVM 3.3, before LLVM had an implementation of a Windows unwinder. Currently? As recent as LLVM 4.0, I don't think the JIT was fully capable of handling COFF files, and LLVM wouldn't emit the correct sections (with the COFF-formatted unwind tables) when used in ELF mode. The prolog is known to be standard since Julia disables FPO

I have the data similar to the following in a data frame: LastName Department Salary 1 Johnson IT 56000 2 James HR 54223 3 Howe Finance 80000 4 Jones Finance 82000 5 Norwood IT 67000 6 Benson Sales 76000 7 Smith Sales 65778 8 Baker HR 56778 9 Dempsey HR 78999 10 Nolan

Let me clarify. These aren’t intended to be exposed to the user. The user code that leads to the generation of these intrinsics will be normal floating point operations combined with either pragmas (such as “STDC FENV_ACCESS ON”) or command line options (such as the recently introduced “-fp-model=strict”). The reason I’ve been avoiding normal constant values is that it provides no information when

I agree with the others that this seems great! I think this information can be super helpful for users both in learning and skimming assembly codes. As a maintainer of a LLVM frontend (JuliaLang), I'm additionally interested in whether some bits of this make sense to end up in libLLVM itself. Probably especially the collection code pieces. For context, I've previously written some code to

We really have been trying to keep in mind that LLVM needs to support multiple front ends, which may be implementing different language standards. As much as possible, I’ve been trying to let the IEEE 754 spec drive my thinking about this, though I’ll admit that on a few points I’ve use the C99 spec as a sort of reference interpretation of IEEE 754. LLVM’s IRBuilder has been recently updated to

Hi Connor, ...The LLVM documentation has a page at > llvm.org/docs/DebuggingJITedCode.html > showing an example of using gdb to debug MCJIT’ed code, but has no mention > of ORC JIT. What debugging support MCJIT has is provided by the RuntimeDyld utility, which ORC shares. I would expect anything in that document to apply to ORC as well, though I haven't tested it personally.

Hello Rsync Community, I have been using rsync for several years to backup servers across an array of different areas. I have run into a new problem that I cannot find an answer for. We just recently purchased a Lacie 5Big Network RAID: http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/default.aspx?EDC=1596257 for one organization. We set up a test server to start backing up to this RAID via AFP. The

This had also came up at llvm-devmtg briefly at the JIT roundtable. One of the collaborators on my project had started a patch years ago to implement some of it https://reviews.llvm.org/D8815, but then we went a different direction with TLS in our frontend and it became unnecessary. On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 12:36 PM David Blaikie via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > +Lang

HI Yichao, RTDyldObjectLinkingLayer has a NotifyObjectLoaded hook that you can use to call NotifyObjectEmitted on your GDBRegistrationListener. If code is going to be unloaded we would have to add an extra hook to call NotifyFreeingObject -- that seems totally reasonable to add. -- Lang. On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Yichao Yu <yyc1992 at gmail.com> wrote: > > What debugging

So, volatile’s been a fine solution — the issue is volatile pointers would perform the load every time; ideally memory accesses would be able to be cached. This is why I’ve been leaning towards disabling the part of instcombine that combines memory accesses instead of using volatile — there should be better performance. On Apr 17, 2019, 9:54 AM -0700, Jameson Nash <vtjnash at gmail.com>,

We have 4 class C networks, 199.129.206.* 199.129.207.* 199.129.208.* 199.129.209.* I see IP addresses from all 4 classes thru tcpdump. Some of these computers broadcast as C-class computers; eg, to 199.129.206.255 Some broadcast to 255.255.255.255 Of course, several C class networks would induce me to use a B-class broadcast, 199.129.255.255 This works for the computers I