similar to: Lustre 1.6.0 beta7 is now available

Hi I want my lustre do such things during OST failed: if some file has stripe data on th failed OST, any operation on the file will return IO error without blocking, and also at this moment I can create and read/write new file or read/write files which have no stripe data on the failed OST without blocking. What should I do ? How to configure? thanks! swin -------------- next part

This may be in the documentation. If so, I missed it. If a site has multiple Lustre file systems, the documentation implies that there only needs to be a single MGS for an entire site (regardless of the number of file systems). However, I also know it is fairly common to have a combined MGS/MDT. So here are the questions. 1. If we are going to have several Lustre file systems,

Chris, Perhaps you need to perform some write_conf like command. I''m not sure if this is needed in 1.6 or not. Shane ----- Original Message ----- From: lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org <lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org> To: lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org> Sent: Fri Mar 07 12:03:17 2008 Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Multihomed

In 1.6.0, when creating a MDT, you could specify multiple --mgsnode options and it would failover between them. 1.6.3 only seems to take the last one and --mgsnode=192.168.1.252 at o2ib:192.168.1.253 at o2ib doesn''t seem to failover to the other node. Any ideas how to get around this? Robert Robert LeBlanc College of Life Sciences Computer Support Brigham Young University leblanc at

Hi, Our lustre environment is: 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL_lustre.1.6.3smp I would like to change recovery timeout from default value 250s to something longer I tried example from manual: set_timeout <secs> Sets the timeout (obd_timeout) for a server to wait before failing recovery. We performed that experiment on our test lustre installation with one OST. storage02 is our OSS [root at

Hi, We run four-node Lustre 2.3, and I needed to both change hardware under MGS/MDS and reassign an OSS ip. Just the same, I added a brand new 10GE network to the system, which was the reason for MDS hardware change. I ran tunefs.lustre --writeconf as per chapter 14.4 in Lustre Manual, and everything mounts fine. Log regeneration apparently works, since it seems to do something, but

hi I''m in need of help to proceed in my project which is titled,"Performance improvements for Patchless lustre client" can u tell me the step by step approach in setting up a patchless lustre client in a high end system. Waiting 4 ur reply thanks and regards, Ashok Bharat -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, Lustre manual 1.6 v18 says that that in production lustre debug level should be set to fairly low. Manual also says that I can verify that level by running following commands: # sysctl portals.debug This gives ne following error error: ''portals.debug'' is an unknown key cat /proc/sys/lnet/debug gives output: ioctl neterror warning error emerg ha config console cat

Hi I used lustre-1.8.3 for Centos5.4. I patched the kernel according to Lustre 1.8 operations manual.pdf. I have a problem when I want to implement quota. My cluster configuration is: 1. one MGS/MDS host (with two devices: sda and sdb,respectively) with the following commands: 1) mkfs.lustre --mgs /dev/sda 2) mount -t lustre /dev/sda /mnt/mgt 3) mkfs.lustre --fsname=lustre

OK, so our old MDS had hardware issues so I configured a new MGS / MDS on a VM (this is a backup lustre filesystem and I wanted to separate the MGS / MDS from OSS of the previous), and then did this: For example: mount -t ldiskfs /dev/old /mnt/ost_old mount -t ldiskfs /dev/new /mnt/ost_new rsync -aSv /mnt/ost_old/ /mnt/ost_new # note trailing slash on ost_old/ If you are unable to connect both

Hi all, Here is the situation: I have 2 nodes MDS1 , MDS2 (10.0.0.22 , 10.0.0.23) I wish to use as failover MGS, active/active MDT with zfs. I have a jbod shelf with 12 disks, seen by both nodes as das (the shelf has 2 sas ports, connected to a sas hba on each node), and I am using lustre 2.4 on centos 6.4 x64 I have created 3 zfs pools: 1. mgs: # zpool

Lustre 1.2.2 has been released! Lustre 1.2.2 contains a significant number of fixes over Lustre 1.2.1 and is a recommended update for anyone running earlier Lustre versions. The most user-visible among them are: - Allow users to set per-directory default striping values - Fix data coherency bugs with concurrent write/truncate - The blocks count is updated on clients for stat without revoking

Is there instructions on how to use the patchless client on RHEL4 ? For version 1.6.2 We would prefer a rpm, but we are not scared of doing a build if needed. Brock Palen Center for Advanced Computing brockp at umich.edu (734)936-1985

Hi, has anyone tried to compile the lustre patchless client on a debian linux for arm architecture? Could be possible to do? Thanks in advance.

Hi, I would like to know what TCP/UDP ports should i keep open in my firewall policies on my MGS server such that I can have my MGS server fire-walled. Also if in a event of loss of MGT would it be possible to recreate the MGT without loosing data or bringing the filesystem down (i.e. by using cached information from MDT''s and OST''s) Thanks Anand

Any recommendation about the sequence to umount multiple lustre file system with combined MGS/MDT or separate MGS, MDT. Thanks. Ming -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20100909/396905b5/attachment.html

I''m seeing this error message on one of my OSS''s but not the other three. Any idea what is causing it? Oct 25 13:58:56 oss2 kernel: LustreError: 3228:0:(client.c:519:ptlrpc_import_delay_req()) @@@ IMP_INVALID req at f6b13200 x18040/t0 o101->MGS at MGC192.168.0.200@tcp_0:26 lens 176/184 ref 1 fl Rpc:/0/0 rc 0/0 Oct 25 13:58:56 oss2 kernel: LustreError:

As any of you using version 1.6 of Lustre knows, Lustre servers can now be started simply my mounting the devices it is using. Even an /etc/fstab entry can be used if you can have the mount delayed until the network is started. Given this change, you have also notices that we have eliminated the initscript for Lustre that used to exist for releases prior to 1.6. I''d like to take a

I''m evaluating lustre. I''m trying what I think is a basic/simple ethernet config. with MDT and OST on the same node. Can someone tell me if the following (~150 second recovery occurring when small 190 GB OST is re-mounted) is expected behavior or if I''m missing something? I thought I would send this and continue with the eval while awaiting a response. I''m using

Hi, Our environment is: 2.6.9-55.0.9.EL_lustre.1.6.3smp I am getting following errors from two OSS''s ... Nov 7 10:39:51 storage09.beowulf.cluster kernel: LustreError: 23045:0:(client.c:519:ptlrpc_import_delay_req()) @@@ IMP_INVALID req at 00000100b410be00 x4190687/t0 o101->MGS at MGC10.143.245.201@tcp_0:26 lens 232/240 ref 1 fl Rpc:/0/0 rc 0/0 Nov 7 10:39:51