similar to: R 2.5.0 in Debian unstable

Dear list, R 2.5.0 packages for Debian stable (i386 and amd64) are now available from CRAN. The new recommended codetools and rcompgen packages haven't completely made it to Debian yet, but can of course be installed in the standard non-Debian ways. Please consult the README file in the Debian directory, and report problems to me directly or to this list. Best regards, Johannes Ranke --

Hi all I'm updating a package for submission to CRAN, and I am getting an error message I never have seen before, and can't find out what it implies or means (and hence, what I need to do to fix it). After running R CMD check, I get this: <snip> * checking foreign function calls ... OK * checking R code for possible problems ... OK * checking Rd files ... OK * checking Rd

After upgrading to R 2.5.1 on Debian, R CMD check gives * checking Rd cross-references ... WARNING Error in .find.package(package, lib.loc) : there is no package called 'codetools' Execution halted * checking for missing documentation entries ... WARNING etc The NEWS file says (for 2.5.0; I was on 2.4 before the recent upgrade) o New recommended package 'codetools' by Luke

Hello All, I'm actually the system administrator of a UNIX system where several users use R version 2.6.0. I have a user who is trying to use the SURVEY package, and when he does, he gets the message: survey' is not a valid package -- installed < 2.0.0? When I run the library() command, I get (see below): Anything that is listed as ** No title available (pre-2.0.0 install?) **

I just built R-devel from source on OS X (Tiger), using the subversion sources. Running ./tools/rsync-recommended didn't download rcompgen. I checked http://cran.r-project/src/contrib/2.7.0/Recommended and indeed, this package is not there. If I try to install using install.packages I get > install.packages("rcompgen", type="source") --- Please select a CRAN

Hello and apologies if this doesn't belong here. I'm trying to build a "portable" version of R - "portable" means that it could be easily moved to another location or machine simply by copying it. However, I encountered a problem when running it elsewhere: it seems that versions of dynamic libraries used by R are fixed and set at the build time; when that instance of R

Hi, after updating to 2.7.0, command line completion doesn't work anymore. I understand that the package rcompgen is now part of utils. I hadn't used rcompgen before but completion worked without it (I double checked it using an 2.6.2 version on another machine). Now, it doesn't work, even after switching on all option via "rc.settings". I updated R using the opensuse 10.3

Dear all, can somebody point me from where to download "rcompgen" package? CRAN does not seem to hold that. Installing this package through install.packages() tells this package is not available. Thanks [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi Mr Tierney, I have noticed an error message from R 1.12.x's CMD check for a while (apparently prof Ripley completely rewrote CMD check in R 1.12+) e.g.: http://bioconductor.org/checkResults/2.7/bioc-LATEST/snpMatrix/lamb2-checksrc.html ---------------- * checking R code for possible problems ... NOTE Warning: non-unique value when setting 'row.names': ?new? Error in

Sorry for reposting, i keep forgetting this should be plain text. Will not make this mistake again Hello, The following code moo <- function(a=1){ x=1; x=x+y} funs <- new.env() enter <- function(type, v, e, w){ assign(v, TRUE, funs) } library(codetools) collectUsage(moo, enterGlobal = enter) adds + to the environment funs i.e. funs: "=" "{" "+"

On 4/9/16 10:54 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 9 April 2016 at 10:28, Mick Jordan wrote: > | Can someone explain a message of this form from an rscript execution: > | > | Note: no visible global function definition for 'foo' > | > | > | This happens right at the start of execution. 'foo' is only executed in > | a branch of an 'if' that is not

Dear list members, I frequently program small scripts and wrap them into functions to be able to check them with checkUsage. In case these functions (loaded via source or copy pasted to the R console) use functions from other packages, I get this error: no visible global function definition for ?xxxxxxx? For example: test = function() { require(plotrix) color.legend() }

I'm observing that the new staged installation in R 3.6.0 can produce: mv: cannot move ?/home/alice/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/3.6/00LOCK-codetools/00new/codetools? to ?/home/alice/R/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-library/3.6/codetools?: File exists ERROR: moving to final location failed on some file systems. # EXAMPLE $ R --vanilla R version 3.6.0 (2019-04-26) -- "Planting of a Tree"

On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 9:05 AM Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the report. According to my reading, this use of "mv" is ok > and the renameat2() call which the invocation of "mv" leads to is also > ok and allowed by POSIX in this context. It could only fail with EEXIST > if the target directory (path/pkg) was not empty.

Hi, I've begun to use the lme4 package, rather than nlme, for more flexibility during modelling, and running the examples in lmer I receive this error message: ---<---------------cut here---------------start-------------->--- R> (fm1 <- lmer(Reaction ~ Days + (Days|Subject), sleepstudy)) Error in printMer(object) : no slot of name "status" for this object of class

Readers, Using version 251 I tried the following command: lm(y~a+b,data=datafile) Resulting in, inter alia: ... coefficients (intercept) a 1.2 3.4 Packages installed: acepack ace() and avas() for selecting regression transformations adlift An adaptive lifting scheme algorithm akima Interpolation of irregularly spaced

I have recently upgraded to Ubuntu Gutsy and, for the first time, am using a 64-bit installation. After failing miserably to install R from source, not a problem for me in the past with a 32-bit install, I went the route of using the Debian Etch build. This went smoothly, but I am unable to update my numerous R and BioConductor packages, getting non-zero exit status errors on each package. Is

> Hello R-help, > > > We are running R version 2.6.0 (2007-10-03). I believe that I got it > from www.sunfreeware.com. A number of the packages that we attempt to > download from http://www.r-project.org/ give us the error message > below when we attempt to run them. > > Can anyone tell me what I need to do to gett these packages to run > properly? > >

On 7 September 2016 at 17:27, Pawe? Pi?tkowski wrote: | Hello and apologies if this doesn't belong here. | | I'm trying to build a "portable" version of R - "portable" means that it could be easily moved to another location or machine simply by copying it. However, I encountered a problem when running it elsewhere: it seems that versions of dynamic libraries used by R

Not certain this is actually a bug, so posting here. I'm on Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS, building R version 4.0.0. The "configure" and "make" steps are successful, but the "make check" step fails when it gets to this part of ./tests/reg-tests-1b.R: ?? > ## methods() gave two wrong warnings in some cases: ?? > op <- options(warn = 2)# no warning, please! ??