similar to: broadcast packets from domU duplicated?

Before I post to networking-discuss I wanted to ask if anyone had tried this on this: I''m trying to run a dhcp-server on a dom0 over a vnic so that the domU''s can get IP addresses. I created a vnic r1 over e1000g0 and gave it a static IP 172.0.94.111/24 so I can run the dhcp server over this vnic. root@lm2-dom0:~# dhtadm -P Name Type Value

Greetings All. We wanted to be able to parse the DHCP values and options and write a lua script based on the information found. We are also using the CPU flags, but thankfully in at least version 4.04 there is already some CPU value parsing even if it isn't documented. Using the information from the CPU table we wanted to be able to choose the kernel to boot. Using the DHCP table

I opened a bug report earlier today but it doesn''t seem to have been added to the bugs database. I''m posting here in case one of the Crossbow developers might see it and confirm this behavior. Description Duplicate packets are generated whenever an aggregate is introduced into the network configuration. We''ve ruled out switch ports and physical bge interfaces as

Hi, Can you tell why my vnic built on top of an aggregation of 2 NICs of 1 Gbit/s doesn''t report a speed of 2 GBit/s ? [root at nazgul /]# dladm show-dev bge0 link: up speed: 1000Mb duplex: full bge1 link: down speed: 0Mb duplex: unknown bge2 link: down speed: 0Mb duplex: unknown bge3 link: down speed: 0Mb

On 03/25/09 12:30, James Carlson wrote: > Girish Moodalbail writes: > >> bash-3.2# dladm show-link >> LINK CLASS MTU STATE PROMISC OVER >> e1000g0 phys 1501 up off -- >> e1000g1 phys 1502 up on -- >> > > That (plus or minus some column alignment) seems

Hi Folks, I have a snv_105 sxce host that I just can''t get to work as expected with crossbow + zones. My test host persephone, is a virtual machine running under VMware ESXi 3.5, with 2 virtual network cards (e1000), all on the same flat network/subnet. It started life just 2 days ago with a clean install of snv_95, and I LUed to 105 yesterday. To rule out any sharing issue, the first

Basically what I am trying to attempt here is to have multiple vm''s in a private network that is seperate from any of the physical networking devices. So far all I have really been able to do is connect the vm''s to an etherstub, but cannot get them to communicate with eachother. I have been using this (http://blogs.sun.com/droux/entry/private_virtual_networks_for_solaris) as a

Hi, I''m running snv_89 on an X4150 with a CentOS-5 guest. I cannot seem to get my second network interface to work properly. I followed the virt-install instructions, and even saw the FAQ entry about adding a second network instance in the XML config. I see my second device in the guest but it''s either connected to the wrong interface or not at all. I''d like to

So, just to play with vnics with 106, I have... e1000g2 plumb''d with 192.168.85.10 vnic0 is created on top of e1000g2 with 192.168.85.22 I snoop on e1000g2 to see the traffic. I ping 192.168.85.22 and it works. I stop the snoop on e1000g2. I ping 192.168.85.22 and it doesn''t work. I start the snoop on e1000g2. I ping 192.168.85.22 and ping works. Is this a new feature with

Hi guys ipconfig performs not well conformed DHCP client transactions. This bug does not affect 100% of the DHCP servers as some of them are more forgiving than others when considering client side protocol mistakes; i.e When PXE installing on a VMware Workstation using the VMware DHCP server plus a proxyDHCP the bug is not present. When PXE installing on a real PC with a Netgear ISP

Commit-ID: 8cb2792d8f7317c336ccc98f99199ae579ac84c6 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=8cb2792d8f7317c336ccc98f99199ae579ac84c6 Author: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <mathieu.trudel-lapierre at canonical.com> AuthorDate: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 10:05:12 -0500 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 03:08:04 +0000 [klibc]

On OpenSolaris 2009.06 I created a flow, half a dozen VNICs, and I set some properties, and everything was working, then I rebooted my system and everything disappeared from show-vnic, show-flow, and show-prop. When I tried to re-create the objects, dladm said they already existed. While I could not see the objects, I could delete them. Example: # dladm show-vnic # dladm create-vnic -l bge0

Hi, Here are two fixes for ipconfig/dhcp, the second of them being required for my dhcp3 server to accept ipconfig's requests. Thanks, Louis Louis Rilling (2): ipconfig: Fix missing dhcp_end field ipconfig: Fix null ciaddr on DHCPREQUEST during SELECTING state usr/kinit/ipconfig/dhcp_proto.c | 4 ++-- usr/kinit/ipconfig/packet.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3

hi, I've written a start of an c32-module to do basic substition: add subst.c32 this is a start of a generic substition module --- commit 9a1f41a7e6599fe6a162197cd9ddc6610185e780 tree cfb799a0be9844926afe44e21b2eb96630666c44 parent 89478bdbfa7167bc1b627a478d042c99e46f06b7 author Maurice Massar <massar at unix-ag.uni-kl.de> Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:13:39 +0200 committer Maurice Massar

hello hpa, please review and on ack merge belows patchset. thanks maks git pull git://git.debian.org/~maks/klibc.git maks for the changes: maximilian attems (8): [klibc] Add initial mntent.h with setmntent() and endmntent() [klibc] add getmntent() [klibc] mount: add help arg for usage() [klibc] mount: list

Hi, I''m afraid I have some problems understanding how crossbow is supposed to work ;) On my machine (OpenSolaris, snv_111) I''m running VirtualBox with couple of linux / XP installation and additionally a zone with exclusive IP. My network configuration looks like this: [6]elsinore:~>dladm show-link LINK CLASS MTU STATE OVER bge0 phys 1500 up

Folks, I''m playing with maxbw on links (as opposed to flows) in Crossbow, and I have a couple of questions. First, the limts seem only advisory. The first example has the main host talking to a zone that has 172.16.17.100 configured on znic0. When there is no maxbw, the throughtput is as expected; when maxbw is 55M the throughput only drops to 76 Mbps: # netperf -H

[ gsi.de pretends this is massmailing so removed from CC's ] hello hpa, please review and on ack merge belows patchset. changes from v1, thanks to review by kzak: * add strtok_r() * use it in getmntent_r() * getment_r() parses mnt_freq and mnt_passno too isn't that hard. thanks maks git pull git://git.debian.org/~maks/klibc.git maks for the changes: maximilian attems (9):

Hi all, Link protection is a new feature we are planning to introduce to Solaris and we would like to solicit your feedback on it. Please see attached document for details.

Hi, I am new to DTrace. Want to capture (for specific port #s) the loopback interface (lo0) tcp message flow with the complete message body. Is this possible with DTrace? Are any examples available? Thanks, Joe ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for a deal? Find great prices on flights and hotels with Yahoo! FareChase.