similar to: KeGetCurrentProcessorNumber returning 256 under windows x64

I''m just doing some testing on the gplpv drivers with different ways of handling interrupts, and I''m trying a scheme where each xen device (eg vbd/vif) driver attaches to the same IRQ as the pci driver, and each handles it in sequence. In testing though, I noticed the following when logging what each ISR is doing: 60.32381439 - evtchn event on port 5 60.32384109 - port 5

I really need to have the ability to tie event channel port''s to interrupts for my gplpv drivers under Windows. Is anyone working on anything like this? Does MSI allow more than one interrupt per PCI device? Thanks James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

''xm block-attach'' doesn''t let me assign the same backend device anymore, even if I use ''r!'' or ''w!''. I think this has changed since 3.1.1 (or maybe since 3.1.0). Is this the way it is supposed to work? Thanks James _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

I have just uploaded a new testing version of GPL PV drivers for Windows. Have a look for 0.10.0.97-dontuse at http://www.meadowcourt.org/downloads (the -dontuse bit is to scare people away who haven''t read this email :) As usual, please test thoroughly on a test DomU and make sure you have a backup before installing on a non-test system. In particular, I''m only testing with Xen

I have just uploaded a new testing version of GPL PV drivers for Windows. Have a look for 0.10.0.97-dontuse at http://www.meadowcourt.org/downloads (the -dontuse bit is to scare people away who haven''t read this email :) As usual, please test thoroughly on a test DomU and make sure you have a backup before installing on a non-test system. In particular, I''m only testing with Xen

I''ve been looking into bug [1]#195 and I have a couple of questions on how timer interrupts and virqs are handled. Is it possible for dom0 linux to irq balance timer interrupts to different cpus? That is, if xen sends a VIRQ_TIMER to vcpu0, backed by cpu0, is it possible for that interrupt to be handled by vcpu1, backed by cpu1 ? After putting in some debug code in to timer_interrupt

>From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@bull.net] >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:26 >> > >> >See how we solve this on x86 near the top of do_boot_cpu() in >> >arch/x86/smpboot.c. Essentially we allocate extra idle domains on >> >demand to give us enough idle vcpus for one per physical cpu. >> > >> > -- Keir >> >> Yes,

>From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@bull.net] >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:40 > >Le Vendredi 21 Avril 2006 09:28, Tian, Kevin a écrit : >> From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:Tristan.Gingold@bull.net] >> >> >Sent: 2006年4月21日 15:26 >> > >> >> >See how we solve this on x86 near the top of do_boot_cpu() in >> >> >arch/x86/smpboot.c.

1. Minimum Mean Square Estimation (for Multi-Dimensional Linear Regression) 2. Two-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Tests 3. Empirical ANOVA Methods All this to be done on empirical data. I am new to the R world, any help would be appreciated. Thank You, Bill Gilliland Lead Sensor Systems Engineer E303, Tactical Communications, Transport, and Sensors Group: Tactical

Hi James, I''m testing GPLPV 0.9.12-pre13 on Windows 2008 x64, and found some interesting results : - The drivers are NOT signed, even though I''ve install certs. Had to use F8 on boot. - both QEMU and Xen block device are active, which usually means corruption is coming. Is this a known issue? http://i44.tinypic.com/2vmypvk.png http://i42.tinypic.com/2mewnia.png Regards, Fajar

Kathy, Thank you very much! Peter Olson Alcatel-Lucent Member of Technical Staff Services Technologies 1960 Lucent Lane Rm 7G334 Naperville, IL 60566 peterolson@alcatel-lucent.com Phone: 630 979 0573 Mobile: 630 430 6926 -----Original Message----- From: xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com Sent:

import include/asm-ia64/xen/interface.h to introduce introduce definitions necessary for ia64/xen hypercalls. They are basic structures to communicate with xen hypervisor and will be used later. Cc: Robin Holt <holt at sgi.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy at goop.org> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata at valinux.co.jp> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck at

import include/asm-ia64/xen/interface.h to introduce introduce definitions necessary for ia64/xen hypercalls. They are basic structures to communicate with xen hypervisor and will be used later. Cc: Robin Holt <holt at sgi.com> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy at goop.org> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata at valinux.co.jp> Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck at

Use their proper counterparts in include/acpi/actbl*.h instead. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- a/xen/arch/ia64/xen/dom_fw_common.c +++ b/xen/arch/ia64/xen/dom_fw_common.c @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ struct fake_acpi_tables { struct acpi_table_header dsdt; uint8_t aml[8 + 11 * MAX_VIRT_CPUS]; struct acpi_table_madt madt; - struct acpi_table_lsapic lsapic[MAX_VIRT_CPUS]; +

It''s everytime when cpufreq_ondemand or cpufreq-set changes the frequency, aprox. 3 messages per event. Is that occasional? I tend to say: no. Please see an excerpt below. And if it''s not occasional, what could I do? And by the way: I found no code that TSC will get adjusted, so I think it will get worse over the time... Thanks, Carsten. messages.0:Jan 9 12:25:15 data kernel:

I''ve recently noticed that my windows crash dumps fail at around 40-50% under GPLPV. ''xm dmesg'' shows the following: (XEN) grant_table.c:350:d0 Iomem mapping not permitted ffffffffffffffff (domain 865) At first I thought that the cause was just a bug in my grant ref code but it just occurred to me that this could be happening when Windows tries to write out the

Trying to install them on Xen 3.4.0, Intel E5345 Processors, Server 2008 64bit. I get the BSoD on boot with the 0x0000007B stop message. I''ve got a bunch of 2003 32bits running on the same host with the 0.10.0.69 drivers and those are totally happy. I tried the boot once with NOGPLPV idea mentioned in another thread, that didn''t do the trick. Ideas anyone? pace

Hi everyone. I´m having this problem with Red Hat 5.4 running on a HP ProLiant BL460c G6. I have two windows 2k3 x64, but network performance is extremely bad without PV drivers, i mean, it takes a lot of time to access any location and if the path has many folders it can´t conect. Redhat provides some PV dirvers. I´ve installed them, but with no improvements. I tested another DomU, with the

Hi I run some hibernation tests on windows HVM and HVM with windows pv driver. The test case is common scenario test(one test case of WHQL test), this test case will hibernate the vm for many times, and doing some IO operations for devices. The windows guest is Srv2008 R2 x64. Following is my test result HVM guest with pv driver, machines 1cpu and 2cpu 4cpu AMD pass pass Intel pass

Hi Ali, Thanks for bringing this up. You're definitely under very tight design constraints from the hardware. I can certainly sympathize. I think two design elements are being conflated here, and it would be worthwhile splitting them out. For correctness, you need to make sure any routines called from an ISR don't clobber equivalent routines called from mainline code. For