similar to: network misbehaviour with gplpv and 2.6.30

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "network misbehaviour with gplpv and 2.6.30"

2010 Jan 13
65
ntpd under Xen Dom0 exhibits extremely high jitter/noise? runs stable/quiet under non-xen kernel.
On a selection of boxes, ntpd running in Xen Dom0 reproducibly exhibits extermely high noise/jitter. Switching back to -default, non-xen kernel ntpd runs with very low jitter/noise. Question -- how can I ''tame'' ntpd noise & jitter when running in Dom0? Is the problem a config issue, or a bug? Already reported this downstream; everybody''s "stumped".
2010 Jan 13
65
ntpd under Xen Dom0 exhibits extremely high jitter/noise? runs stable/quiet under non-xen kernel.
On a selection of boxes, ntpd running in Xen Dom0 reproducibly exhibits extermely high noise/jitter. Switching back to -default, non-xen kernel ntpd runs with very low jitter/noise. Question -- how can I ''tame'' ntpd noise & jitter when running in Dom0? Is the problem a config issue, or a bug? Already reported this downstream; everybody''s "stumped".
2010 May 21
10
What''s the different for "dom0_max_vcpus=4 dom0_vcpus_pin" and "dom0_max_vcpus=4" ?
Hi experts, Q1:What''s the different for "dom0_max_vcpus=4 dom0_vcpus_pin" and "dom0_max_vcpus=4" ? which will get better performance Q2: dom0_max_vcpus=4 means "core0-3 will be just used by dom0" or means "4 cores(not dedicate cores) will be used by dom0, eg: core2-5 or core3-6? Q3.what does mean "nosmp" , xen, dom0,domU, will just use one
2010 May 21
10
What''s the different for "dom0_max_vcpus=4 dom0_vcpus_pin" and "dom0_max_vcpus=4" ?
Hi experts, Q1:What''s the different for "dom0_max_vcpus=4 dom0_vcpus_pin" and "dom0_max_vcpus=4" ? which will get better performance Q2: dom0_max_vcpus=4 means "core0-3 will be just used by dom0" or means "4 cores(not dedicate cores) will be used by dom0, eg: core2-5 or core3-6? Q3.what does mean "nosmp" , xen, dom0,domU, will just use one
2010 Mar 30
15
[Xen-tools] Unable to start xend
[root@localhost onkar]# which xend /usr/sbin/xend [root@localhost onkar]# uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.31.12 #1 SMP Wed Mar 31 09:51:44 IST 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root@localhost onkar]# xend start ERROR Internal error: Could not obtain handle on privileged command interface (2 = No such file or directory) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/xend",
2010 Mar 30
15
[Xen-tools] Unable to start xend
[root@localhost onkar]# which xend /usr/sbin/xend [root@localhost onkar]# uname -a Linux localhost.localdomain 2.6.31.12 #1 SMP Wed Mar 31 09:51:44 IST 2010 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root@localhost onkar]# xend start ERROR Internal error: Could not obtain handle on privileged command interface (2 = No such file or directory) Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/xend",
2010 May 27
33
Xen 4.0 - Support for Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers
Hi, recently Ive installed Windows 2008 x64 HVM domain on Xen 4.0. On xen wiki is info: Support for Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers, included in XCP (Xen Cloud Platform). Xen Cloud Platform: So I installed them on Windows 2008 x64 domain and its not able to boot anymore: File: \windows\system32\Drivers\xevtchn.sys Status: 0xc0000428 Info: Windows cannot verify the digital
2010 May 27
33
Xen 4.0 - Support for Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers
Hi, recently Ive installed Windows 2008 x64 HVM domain on Xen 4.0. On xen wiki is info: Support for Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers, included in XCP (Xen Cloud Platform). Xen Cloud Platform: So I installed them on Windows 2008 x64 domain and its not able to boot anymore: File: \windows\system32\Drivers\xevtchn.sys Status: 0xc0000428 Info: Windows cannot verify the digital
2008 Mar 26
5
[Xen-users] xend (12, ''Cannot allocate memory'')
I''m getting the error: xend (12, ''Cannot allocate memory'') From the command line after the Dom-0 goes through a period of heavy memory usage. I don''t have any hard numbers on how to duplicate it, but I''ll give you the steps I''ve gone through to duplicate the problem. First, some information about my setup. It''s a new setup, and has
2010 Mar 14
6
xm mem-set Domain-0 box went poof
On a fresh reboot free: total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 3371340 448156 2923184 0 5328 77840 ---------- top: Mem: 3371340k total, 449044k used, 2922296k free, 5344k buffers ---------- xentop - 01:44:00 Xen 3.4.3-rc4-pre 1 domains: 1 running, 0 blocked, 0 paused, 0 crashed, 0 dying, 0 shutdown Mem: 4160828k total, 4022996k used, 137832k free CPUs: 4
2009 Nov 23
18
OpenSuSE 11.2 bug, dom0-cpus limit causes xenwatch_cb running 100% and xm command freeze and xend dead
Hi all, I have upgraded a test machine from OpenSuSE 11.1 to 11.2. I have found following bug: the server is a 2x quadcore intel box also 2x4=8cpu If you limit the dom0 cpu with dom0-cpus= [1-7]: - [xenwatch_cb] is running 100% cpu and makes var log entry every 65 sec BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X stuck for 61s! - xm commands not work - xend is dead if set dom0-cpus to 0 or 8: - everything looks
2010 Jan 27
9
Remote debug quetion
Hey all, I plan to use windbg tool to do remote debug my Windows PV Driver. I''m confused how to setup the enviroment. Any Advice? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2010 Jan 27
9
Remote debug quetion
Hey all, I plan to use windbg tool to do remote debug my Windows PV Driver. I''m confused how to setup the enviroment. Any Advice? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
2007 Sep 11
2
Bug#441249: Bug#441249: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae: "Problems using XEN when Quagga is running"
Hi, > Can you manually do on the xen interfaces what the scripts would? How about > doing it on some other interface configured in a similar way? Toying with the vif-route script, I might have found a workaround for this issue. If I disable the ifconfig and ip route commands from vif-route script, and bring up vif interface by hand later on, everything seems to work. In other works,
2012 Aug 20
22
Xen 4.3 release planning proposal
Hello everyone! With the completion of our first few release candidates for 4.2, it''s time to look forward and start planning for the 4.3 release. I''ve volunteered to step up and help coordinate the release for this cycle. The 4.2 release cycle this time has been nearly a year and a half. One of the problems with having such a long release is that people who get in features
2011 Jan 03
13
Re: pvusb drivers for pvops 2.6.32.x kernel
Hello, Jeremy: See the included patch. If it''s OK it''d be nice to get it into xen/stable-2.6.32.x branch. Thanks Nathanael! -- Pasi ----- Forwarded message from Nathanael Rensen <nathanael@polymorpheus.com> ----- From: Nathanael Rensen <nathanael@polymorpheus.com> To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> Cc: n_iwamatsu@jp.fujitsu.com Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011
2009 Feb 02
4
HVM Live Migration Troubles - Xen 3.3.1
I''m having issues with HVM live migration and every xen version I''ve tried - 3.0.1, 3.1.x, 3.3.0 and 3.3.1. Migrations will fail intermittently with messages like this on the receiving hypervisor: [2009-02-02 11:35:19 12629] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:264) [xc_restore]: /usr/lib64/xen/bin/xc_restore 4 4 2 3 1 1 1 [2009-02-02 11:35:19 12629] INFO (XendCheckpoint:403)
2009 Nov 10
5
GPLPV driver problems with Win2k8-R2
Hi all, after installing the driver ( I used the Vista-2008-Debug version) and rebooting, the system presents me an interface for recovering the OS using an image. I use Xen 3.3.1 Is there a workaround? Thanks and regards, Francesco Gallo _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
2008 Feb 02
17
New binary release of GPL PV drivers for Windows
I''ve just uploaded a new binary release of the GPL PV drivers for Windows - release 0.6.3. Fixes in this version are: . Should now work on any combination of front and backend bit widths (32, 32p, 64). Previous crashes that I thought were due to Intel arch were actually due to this problem. . The vbd driver will now not enumerate ''boot'' disks (eg those normally serviced
2008 Feb 02
17
New binary release of GPL PV drivers for Windows
I''ve just uploaded a new binary release of the GPL PV drivers for Windows - release 0.6.3. Fixes in this version are: . Should now work on any combination of front and backend bit widths (32, 32p, 64). Previous crashes that I thought were due to Intel arch were actually due to this problem. . The vbd driver will now not enumerate ''boot'' disks (eg those normally serviced