similar to: [PATCH] cpuidle: Fix for timer_deadline==0 case

Adjust handle_hpet_broadcast to let it run better before broadcast exit Since hpet_broadcast_exit has been moved after interrupt enabled in C3 case, so adjust the handler of hpet broadcast to adapt to this. Meanwhile, remove a freqently executed debug print line to simplify the serial output. Signed-off-by: Wei Gang <gang.wei@intel.com> diff -r 63317b6c3eab xen/arch/x86/hpet.c ---

flight 6714 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/6714/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: build-amd64-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 6658 build-amd64 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 6658 build-i386-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 6658

... to be more precise in naming, and also to match Linux. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> --- 2009-07-10.orig/xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/perfmon.c 2009-05-27 13:54:05.000000000 +0200 +++ 2009-07-10/xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/perfmon.c 2009-07-15 10:02:08.000000000 +0200 @@ -7313,7 +7313,7 @@ xenpfm_context_create(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(p goto out; /* XXX fmt */ -

CPUIDLE: Avoid remnant LAPIC timer intr while force hpetbroadcast LAPIC will stop during C3, and resume to work after exit from C3. Considering below case: The LAPIC timer was programmed to expire after 1000us, but CPU enter C3 after 100us and exit C3 at 9xxus. 0us: reprogram_timer(1000us) 100us: entry C3, LAPIC timer stop 9xxus: exit C3 due to unexpected event, LAPIC timer continue running

This patchset enable support for C1 mwait entry. [PATCH 1/3] dom0-C1-FFH.patch. It gets C1 information from ACPI table and pass it to Xen. [PATCH 2/3] add-idx-field.patch. This patch adds an idx field in the ''struct acpi_processor_cx''. It can simplify some coding lines. [PATCH 3/3] xen-C1-FFH.patch. It adds support for C1 FFH (mwait) entry. Meanwhile add timing for C1. The

[PATCH 1/2] Support multiple C3 states. There may be multiple ACPI C3 states mapped into different CPU C-states.So made some modification to support this case. [PATCH 2/2] Handle C2 LAPIC timer & TSC stop. ACPI C2 is quite possible mapped to CPU C3 or deeper state, so thinking from worst cases, enable C3 like entry/exit handling for C2 by default. Option ''lapic_timer_c2_ok''

Without this patch, while running on platforms on which the deepest C-state is C2, acpi_processor_idle fns will call into NULL function. BTW, made a little enhancement for keyhandler print-out to make it more readable. Signed-off-by: Wei Gang <gang.wei@intel.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

ACPI C2 is quite possible mapped to CPU C3 or deeper state, so thinking from worst cases, enable C3 like entry/exit handling for C2 by default. Option ''lapic_timer_c2_ok'' can be used to select simple C2 entry/exit only if the user make sure that LAPIC tmr & TSC will not be stopped during C2. Signed-off-by: Wei Gang <gang.wei@intel.com>

Dom0 uses this hypercall to pass ACPI information to Xen. It is not very uncommon for more cpus to be listed in the ACPI tables than are present on the system, particularly on systems with a common BIOS for a 2 and 4 socket server varients. As Dom0 does not control the number of entries in the ACPI tables, and is required to pass everything it finds to Xen, reduce the ERR to an INFO.

_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

On 03/23/2011 08:43 AM, Len Brown wrote: > Why is this patch a step forward? Hi Len, I have basically moved the code for arch default and mwait idle from arch/x86/kernel/process.c to a driver. This was suggested by Venki (https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/19/460) as part of pm_idle cleanup and direct call of cpuidle_idle_call(). There is not much new code here. > >> +obj-$(CONFIG_X86)

It has never been used for anything, and Linux 3.7 doesn''t propagate this information anymore. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- Konrad, on the pv-ops side it may be better to pass zero rather than leaving the field completely uninitialized. --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpu_idle.c @@ -935,7 +935,6 @@ static void set_cx( }

On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 06:03:28PM +0530, Trinabh Gupta wrote: > This patch implements a default cpuidle driver for xen. > Earlier pm_idle was flipped to default_idle. Maybe there > is a better way to ensure default_idle is called > without using this cpuidle driver. Please also CC the Xen devel mailing list (I did this for you) I couldn''t find it in the description, but I

Patch 1 removes CONFIG_SMP Patch 2 removes separate smp_{,r,w}mb()s as a result of patch 1 Patch 4 removes __ia64__ defines from the x86 arch tree Patch 3 is related to patch 4 and changes the VIOAPIC to emulate version 0x20 as a performance gain. It preceeds Patch 4 so as to be more clear about the functional change. Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>

Arnaud, I was finally able to get back to this issue and would recommend adding these items to the FAQ #37 about recalibrating the UPS: 1a. It's important that the UPS be at 100% charge before starting the procedure; starting at lower will not work at all, not just produce inaccurate numbers. ? ? ? [I started the procedure when the UPS was at 91% charge. After that it would never report

hello i hope i am posting to the right list, i am a totally blind user, and i want to reprogram my aastra pt 480e phone, my friend used the web configurator, but i think he programmed thw wrong codes, a few questions, is it possible to damage the phone by programming it wrong? also, how does one reset it literally to factory defaults? as unplugging it and replugging it back into the wall

Dear expeRts, recently I asked for a nice way to re-program a problem without using control constructs such as "for" or "sapply(1:length(x), ...". Is there a way to program a random walk with a reflecting boundary without resorting to such constructs? A working solution is ranwalk <- function(length, bound) { k <- cumsum(sample(c(-1, 1), length, replace=TRUE))

> I've contact Polycom via their web form and they emailed me back > around 2 > days later. We've purchased all of our phones via authorized > resellers. > Dunno if that makes a difference or not. > > My question was about the button programability and their response was > that the manual was incorrect. You can not program buttons to have > extended

Hi everybody, I would like to set asterisk up such that to use the call parking feature, instead of transferring a call to the extension set up in features.conf, you just dial a code (e.g. *3) and this then parks the call. The main reason for this is that a number of the phones I use have transfer buttons that I can't reprogram to use Asterisk's own transfer functions, therefore you

Hello, I know this is an out of date technology, but I have a need to use it to reprogram some old phones. I have managed to get Asterisk and a Digium board to upload scripts to the phones using the asterisk.adsi example, but trying to make my own scripts based on the example file is proving very limiting and difficult. I am sure there are a lot of features I am missing since