similar to: c/s 18726 ???

Ever since 3.0.2 we''ve been carrying this patch in our products. Since there was no indication that there would be anything wrong with the ''new'' IO-APIC ack method added back then, we finally decided to drop this patch recently from SLE11, to find that the subsequent release candidate failed to work on at least on system without using "ioapic_ack=old". With

This issue was brought up about a year and a half ago. So I''ll bring it up again and see if anything happens. I''ve got an infiniband network and am attempting to pass the infiniband card through the host and give it to the guest. I''m working with standard CentOS 5.2 on both guest and host with their provided xen (3.0.3 ish). I''ve also attempted to install the

This issue was brought up about a year and a half ago. So I''ll bring it up again and see if anything happens. I''ve got an infiniband network and am attempting to pass the infiniband card through the host and give it to the guest. I''m working with standard CentOS 5.2 on both guest and host with their provided xen (3.0.3 ish). I''ve also attempted to install the

Hi, Keir, These patches are rebased version of Yunhong''s original patches, which were sent out before XEN 3.2 was released. These patches enable MSI support and limited MSI-X support in XEN. Here is the original description of the patches from Yunhong''s mail. The basic idea including: 1) Keep vector global resource owned by xen, while split pirq into per-domain

In sh_page_fault(), there are some code like following, why we think it is mmio only when paging_vcpu_mode_translate(v)? Thanks Yunhong Jiang /* What mfn is the guest trying to access? */ gfn = guest_l1e_get_gfn(gw.eff_l1e); gmfn = vcpu_gfn_to_mfn(v, gfn); mmio = (is_hvm_domain(d) && paging_vcpu_mode_translate(v) &&

lspci shows MSI enabled for PCI device. PCI passthrough works fine. However, as soon as the MSI driver for card is insmodded, kernel panics. This is on xen-unstable. Tried the same with xen-3.3.0 which is supposed to have MSI passthrough, but the same guest shows MSI as disabled. Any else seen this bug, or know of a workaround ? Trace is as follows : ------------[ cut here ]------------

This patch changes the pirq to be per-domain in xen tree. Signed-off-by: Jiang Yunhong <yunhong.jiang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Shan Haitao <haitao.shan@intel.com> Best Regards Shan Haitao _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

I was trying to patch Xen 3.2 from the mercurial repository with the MSI patches by Yunhong Jiang given at the bottom of this page : http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2007-11/msg00157.html The tree seems to have significantly changed, especially the hvm_irq_dpci_mapping structure in irq.h header file. Are there any updated patches, or can I get a version of Xen from somewhere

Hi all, I had posted about MCA support for Intel64 before. It had only a function to log the MCA error data received from hypervisor. http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-09/msg00876.html I attach patches that support not only error logging but also Page Offlining function. The page where an MCA occurs will offline and not reuse. A new flag ''PGC_reserved''

Hi All, I''m getting the attached panic in the hypervisor on a Sun 6270 running xen-testing.hg changeset 19913:6063c16aeeaa. I can run xen-3.3.1 from the standard SLES 11 distribution (which says that it''s changeset 18546 but it has many patches). Any ideas? thanks, dan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Hi, all Page offline can be used by many purpose, like memory offline, memory power management, proactive action when multiple CE error happen to one page etc. In virtualization environment without guest offline support, we think offline a page usually means replace the old page with a new one transparently to guest. Currently we are trying to add page offline support in Xen environment .

Hi all, This is our nightly testing report for c/s 17917; no new issue today, and bug #1286 got fixed. Fixed issue: ============================================== 1. guest cannot be created with two disks appended. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1286 Old issues: ============================================== 1. dom0 hangs with io errors printed while booting hvm

Any advice about the patch cr8-acceleration-3.patch? Hi Keir, could you give some comments? Thanks! -- Dexuan -----Original Message----- From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Cui, Dexuan Sent: 2006年10月25日 11:12 To: Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject: [Xen-devel] [Patch][RESEND] Add hardware CR8

Hi, milos/list, now I''m working on some code related to page sharing. Are there any document/wiki that show how to setup the page sharing environment, so that I can test my code? Checking the code, I noticed the only tapdisk/blktap will use this page sharing mechanism. I''m not sure HVM guest without PV driver can use blktap, so does page sharing support HVM guest? Sorry that

Hi, on a Nehalem system with VT-d enabled we are seeing strange ACPI-Table contents, especially a corrupted DMAR entry. The hypervisor shows following data on boot: (XEN) ACPI: RSDP 000F80E0, 0024 (r2 PTLTD ) (XEN) ACPI: XSDT BF7C469E, 00D4 (r1 PTLTD XSDT 60000 LTP 0) (XEN) ACPI: FACP BF7C9CC9, 00F4 (r3 FSC TYLERBRG 60000 PTL F4240) (XEN) ACPI: DSDT BF7C4772, 54D3 (r1

Hi, Keir, Currently, HVM guests do not have access to performance counters. So it is not possible to use performance analyzer software such as vtune in HVM guest to analyze programme performance. Other usage of performance counters , for example, the NMI watchdog, won''t function either. This patch will enable performance counters in HVM guest. Currently, only Core 2 Duo is implemented.

Looking at the MSI implementation I have a couple of questions: 1) There currently seems to be a hidden requirement of NR_PIRQS in the kernel needing to be no smaller than NR_IRQS in the hypervisor. Otherwise, the pirq returned from PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq may collide with the dynamic IRQs in the kernel or even be out of range altogether. Therefore I think that NR_PIRQS has to become a variable

Make NR_IRQ overridable by each pv instances. Pv instance may need each own number of irqs so that NR_IRQS should be the maximum number of nr_irqs each pv instances need. Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata at valinux.co.jp> --- arch/ia64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ include/asm-ia64/hardirq.h | 4 +++- include/asm-ia64/irq.h | 13 +++++++++++-- 3

On 2014/7/29 22:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 26 July 2014 11:08:37 Yijing Wang wrote: >> The series is a draft of generic MSI driver that supports PCI >> and Non-PCI device which have MSI capability. If you're not interested >> it, sorry for the noise. > > I've finally managed to take some time to look at the series. Overall, > the concept

On 2014/7/29 22:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Saturday 26 July 2014 11:08:37 Yijing Wang wrote: >> The series is a draft of generic MSI driver that supports PCI >> and Non-PCI device which have MSI capability. If you're not interested >> it, sorry for the noise. > > I've finally managed to take some time to look at the series. Overall, > the concept