similar to: [VPID] Invalidate VPID mapping on INVLPG? [PATCH]

Hello, The fast emulation path patch introduced a bug when we have an event injection during a write to a pagetable: after removing shadows we still jump to the done label, releasing the lock even if we aren''t grabbing it. Inline patch fixes this. Signed-off-by: Gianluca Guida <gianluca.guida@eu.citrix.com> diff -r 8848d9e07584 xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c ---

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Dec 19, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Gianluca Guida wrote: >> Attached patch makes runJITOnFunction more reliable. > > When would MCI be null? Everytime you call recompileAndRelinkFunction. It calls runJITOnFunction without specifying the MCI argument, which get defaulted to NULL. Gianluca -- It was a

Dear All: I am pretty new to xen-devel, please correct me in the following. Assume we have the following terms GPT: guest page table SPT: shadow page table (Question a) When guest OS is running, is it always using SPT for address translation? If it is the case, how does guest OS refer and modify its own GPT content? It seems that there is a page table entry in SPT for the GPT page. (Question

On Dec 19, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Gianluca Guida wrote: > Hello, > > JIT::recompileAndRelinkFunction's runJITOnFunction does not use the > MCI arg, causing null pointer deferences at every call. > > Attached patch makes runJITOnFunction more reliable. When would MCI be null? -Chris

Hi, (Assume VPID is available and enabled.) I''m trying to figure the TLB stuff with VPIDs. I understand from the poorly written chapter in the intel manual that if an HVM vcpu is running then only the TLBs tagged with the vcpu.VPID will be used. If xen or a PV guest is running, then VPID 0 TLBs are what will be used. Now I understand the hvm_asid_flush_vcpu upon new guest cr3, will

Hello, JIT::recompileAndRelinkFunction's runJITOnFunction does not use the MCI arg, causing null pointer deferences at every call. Attached patch makes runJITOnFunction more reliable. Thanks, Gianluca -- It was a type of people I did not know, I found them very strange and they did not inspire confidence at all. Later I learned that I had been introduced to electronic engineers.

Please add a test to http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/unittests/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JITTest.cpp?view=markup verifying that recompileAndRelinkFunction() keeps working. Then this fix will look fine to me. On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Gianluca Guida <glguida at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>

Is there any trouble with mailing list? I didn''t see my mail sent back after almost 8hrs. :-( Thanks, Kevin -----Original Message----- From: Tian, Kevin Sent: 2008年2月22日 10:33 To: ''Tim Deegan'' Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Subject: [PATCH][UPDATE]Remove lock on guest table walk >From: Tim Deegan >Sent: 2008年2月21日 22:13 >Hi, > >So, the idea seems

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin at google.com> wrote: > Please add a test to > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/unittests/ExecutionEngine/JIT/JITTest.cpp?view=markup > verifying that recompileAndRelinkFunction() keeps working. Then this > fix will look fine to me. Here it is. Unfortunately I'm not exactly a C++ guy so I'm open to

This patch implement a very simple non complete reverse map for OOS pages writable mappings to avoid shadow brute-force search on resyncs. Signed-off-by: Gianluca Guida <gianluca.guida@eu.citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

= Linee guida per la modifica del Wiki di CentOS = Questa pagina contiene alcune linee guida per la modifica del Wiki. Poich? queste linee guida sono in divenire, ricordatevi di tornare su questa pagina ogni tanto. == Linee guida riguardo al markup del Wiki == * Usare link relativi invece che link assoluti o link liberi. I link relativi devono avere la forma seguente: {{{[:Percorso:Testo

We''ve got reports of that change causing HVM data corruption issues. While I can''t see what''s wrong with the patch, I''d suggest at least reverting it from the 3.3 tree (which is what our code is based upon) for the time being. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

We recently observed a problem with Solaris HVM domains. The bug was seen was seen with a higher number of VCPUs (3 or more), and always had the same pattern: some memory was allocated in the guest, but the first reference caused it to crash with a fatal pagefault. However, on inspection of the page tables, the guests'' view of the pagetables was consistent: the page was present.

On 06/13/2013 10:11 PM, Michael Giardino wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running libvert on a Debian 7 system. I have upgraded libvert and qemu > from source (v1.06 and 1.5.0 respectively) and the problem persists. The > guest OS is also a Debian 7 system running a non-SMP kernel. The error > message from virt-manager is > > Error starting domain: unsupported configuration:

> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >> >> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >> >> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake >> >> has the current EL6

Hi, today I tried to configure a guest using Virt-Manager and used the "copy host cpu configuration" option which resultet in a "Sandy Bridge" model. What I noticed is that for example the "aes" extension is not available in the guest even though it is available on the host cpu. This is what the host cpu looks like: model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v3 @

Hi. When I compiled xen-3.3-testing with DEBUG_TRACE_DUMP in xen/include/xen/lib.h turned on, I got some errors at SHADOW_PRINTK. The following patch will fix the arguments passed to SHADOW_PRINTK in xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c and xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c. Although I haven''t tested, it is the same for xen-unstable.hg Thanks, Yoshi Signed-off-by: Yoshi Tamura

Hi All, I have recently installed CentOS 6.3 with QEMU+KVM for Virtualization. I have successfully created a Windows 2003 VM with 4GB of RAM. The host server is an HP ML350 G8 with 24GB RAM and 24 cores. Details of one of the cores is shown below: processor : 23 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 45 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 11:28 AM Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cecchi at gmail.com> wrote: > An older thread on CentOS pointed to this resource: > http://dries.eu/rpms/perl-Net-SCP-Expect/perl-Net-SCP-Expect > > HIH, > Gianluca > >> >> Sorry I missed the "Expect" in the rpm name....

Kashyap: I have not tried integrating your guest xml but I will look over it today when I get a chance. Thank you. Martin: Below is the output from /proc/cpuinfo. Let me know if there is anything else that would be helpful in debugging this. Thank you, Michael Giardino processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 60 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz stepping