similar to: [PATCH] Hyper-V guest interface support with small set of enlightenments

flight 12043 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/12043/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12031 test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12031 test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 7

flight 13540 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13540/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 13536 build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 13536 Regressions which are regarded as

flight 9194 xen-4.1-testing real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/9194/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 7 debian-install fail REGR. vs. 9185 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking, including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9

flight 10626 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/10626/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 16 guest-start.2 fail in 10623 REGR. vs. 10621 Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 4 xen-install fail

Hi all! Did the nested xen stuff make it into the xen-unstable (4.1-rc1?) tree as suggested back in January by Tim Deegan? TIA ________________________________ Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 16:01:12 +0000 From: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@citrix.com> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] Nested Virtualization: Overview To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@amd.com> Cc: Keir Fraser

----- Forwarded message from Keir Fraser <keir.fraser at eu.citrix.com> ----- From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser at eu.citrix.com> To: "xen-devel at lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel at lists.xensource.com>, xen-users at lists.xensource.com Cc: Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 05:26:28 -0700 Subject: [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Xen 3.4.0 released! Folks, We're pleased to announce

flight 18753 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/18753/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 8 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 18750 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail

flight 12252 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/12252/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 12249 build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 12249 Tests which are failing intermittently

flight 13925 xen-4.2-testing real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13925/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 9 guest-start.2 fail REGR. vs. 13922 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 10 guest-saverestore fail

Intercepting this MSR is pointless - The swapgs instruction does not cause a vmexit, so the cached result of this is potentially stale after the next guest instruction. It is correctly saved and restored on vcpu context switch. Furthermore, 64bit Windows writes to this MSR on every thread context switch, so interception causes a substantial performance hit. From: Paul Durrant

flight 8803 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8803/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 8769 test-amd64-i386-xl 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 8769 test-amd64-i386-pair 6 xen-install/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 8769

flight 5673 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/5673/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: test-i386-i386-xl 14 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 5640 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking, including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable: test-amd64-amd64-win 16

flight 5685 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/5685/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pv 5 xen-boot fail pass in 5680 Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking, including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable:

flight 15155 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/15155/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 15130 build-i386-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 15130 Tests which are failing intermittently

flight 7341 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/7341/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: build-amd64-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 7285 build-amd64 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 7285 build-i386-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 7285

flight 13383 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13383/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-pair 16 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 13379 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 12

flight 5665 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/5665/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: build-amd64-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 5640 build-amd64 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 5640 build-i386-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 5640

flight 12090 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/12090/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12031 test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 7 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 12031 test-i386-i386-xl-win 7

flight 10413 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/10413/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 3 host-install(3) broken test-amd64-i386-win 8 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 10201 test-i386-i386-win 8 guest-saverestore fail REGR. vs. 10201

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> CC: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org> CC: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> CC: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org> CC: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> CC: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> --- misc/coverity_model.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)