similar to: [RFC][PATCH][1/2] Intel(r) Trusted Execution Technology support: xen

The new sboot module that performs the measured launch, for Intel(R) TXT support. Part c - use ''cat'' to concatenate the pieces Signed-off-by: Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jimmy Wei <gang.wei@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Shane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Zhai Edwin <edwin.zhai@intel.com>

This patch adds SMP support to the previous version. Since that has not been merged I have included it in this patch. This should apply cleanly to the tip. Below is the text of the original submittal, slightly updated. Attached is a preliminary patch that adds Intel(R) LaGrande Technology (LT) (Safer Mode Extensions - SMX) support to Xen. While there are still several enhancements needed for

Hello, Has any more work been done on this front? The message below is from Sept. 2006. In particular, the LT/TXT Technology Enabling Platform (TEP) is now available from MPC Corp. Where can one obtain an appropriate AC SINIT module (i.e., like lpg_sinit_20050831_pae.auth.bin below)? I would like to begin using Xen with TXT support. Thanks, -Jon This patch adds SMP support to the

This patch updates the tboot tarfile used by the optional tboot-* build targets to be the latest one in the Trusted Boot SourceForge site. Please include this patch in 1.3. Joe # HG changeset patch # User Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@intel.com> # Date 1215027500 25200 # Node ID 1877486e4c371c9d3fe52671cdcb0a13feafefa7 # Parent 08f77df14cba8e2dfe580779bb9ca2f64e1ae0ae Update tboot tarfile

flight 10626 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/10626/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 16 guest-start.2 fail in 10623 REGR. vs. 10621 Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 4 xen-install fail

New versions of tboot support ACPI GAS (Generic Address Structure) for handling sleep states. This required a change to the tboot_shared_t data structure that is not backwards compatible. This patch requires that new version makes use of GAS when invoking tboot on shutdown. Signed-off-by: Shane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@intel.com> diff

Attached and below are a patch that unifies the shutdown code paths in Xen, including those from EARLY_FAIL. This will facilitate the use of Intel(R) TXT for measured launch by ensuring that all shutdowns will call the necessary hook to tear down the measured environment. It also centralizes any future shutdown-related changes. The patch also postpones clearing the online status APs in

It seems that xenstore watches do not work from domU userspace (they obviously do for drivers). In some preliminary debugging of this, there are two aspects of the failure: not sending the watch to xenstore and not handling watch events for userspace watches. The former can be easily fixed by adding the missing ''case XS_WATCH:'' to xenbus_dev_write() in xenbus_dev.c. The

The __restore_processor_state() fn restores %gs on resume from S3. As such, it cannot be protected by the stack-protector guard since %gs will not be correct on function entry. There are only a few other fns in this file and it should not negatively impact kernel security that they will also have the stack-protector guard removed (and so it's not worth moving them to another file). Without

The __restore_processor_state() fn restores %gs on resume from S3. As such, it cannot be protected by the stack-protector guard since %gs will not be correct on function entry. There are only a few other fns in this file and it should not negatively impact kernel security that they will also have the stack-protector guard removed (and so it's not worth moving them to another file). Without

How can I activate Intel Virtualization Technology on an Intel Entry Server Board SE7230NH1-E with Pentium D 950 CPU? I have the lastest BIOS patch (1179) but there is no option to activate Virtualization Technology. I searched all over the Internet but it''s imposible to obtain a clear information if this combination of SE7230NH1-E motherboard + Intel E7230 server chipset + BIOS +

Can someone provide instructions and the necessary environment/toolchain support needed to get Xen to build and boot on a native EFI system (i.e. with no CSM/legacy support)? Joe

I noticed that the changesets around 7378:bd3268de4145 introduced the xen_domain_handle_t param to xc_create_domain(), the struct domain, etc. and call it a "tool UUID". Can someone explain how this is envisioned being used (xend sets it to some magic values but I don''t see it get used anywhere)? Joe _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list

Surely you hear plenty about what''s not working, so I thought I''d shoot a quick message on something that did work. I got Windows Server 2008 RC2 installed. I have yet to even activate it and prove all internal features/devices work, but installation alone satisfied me! I had to fight a couple issues and I''ll mention them here, i think they''d be pretty

Hi, folks I installed Xen 3.3 on my Lenovo T400 notebook, via compiling source code. When I boot from the linux xen 2.6.18, the network fails start and xend fails too. The network adaptor is Intel 82567LM Gigabit Network Connection. Does anybody else get the same problem? I cannot figure it out whether this is caused by driver support of xen or faulty configuration. Need your help and thanks a

Is Intel VMDq supported in Xen 3.3 or 3.4 ? And if not when will it be ? Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes sont etablis a l''attention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont strictement confidentiels. Pour en savoir plus cliquer ici This message and any attachments are confidential to the ordinary user of the e-mail address to which it was addressed and may also be privileged.

Hi, recently I came across a deal on a bunch of Dell PowerEdge 2850 servers and I was hoping to use them to run Debian with Xen to provided virtualization support for Windows 2003 and other Debian installations. I was hoping to install 2 copies of Windows 2003 as well as 2 copies of Debian all on top of the DOM0 Debian installation. The servers have dual 3.2ghz CPU''s and include 16GB

Hi! Anyone have a suggestion which version of Linux would be the best host? We typically use Ubuntu but we are flexible since we want the best performance and the least amount of headaches getting it installed and working. Thanks, Jimmy _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi, all Some Latest Intel CPU models (CPUID.1.EAX >= 0x00010674) support cupid mask features. Cpuid feature mask is used to limit the feature flags reported by CPUID.1.EDX:ECX. This small patch adds CPUID feature mask support in XEN by adding boot options in Grub entry as below example: kernel /boot/xen.gz com1=115200,8n1 console=com1 cpuid_mask_ecx = 0xFFFF7FFF cpuid_mask_edx = 0xFFFFFFFC

Hi All, I found it very difficult to get Xen-3.1 up on a a machine with Intel''s ICH9 family of disk controllers :-(. Is the ICH9 support really there in xen-3.2 ? I tried but was not successful in booting even xen-3.2 from xen.org. Did anyone have a success? Or any help on what extra config options I need to pass while compiling a domain0 from xen sources? Thanks, -- Pradeep Singh