similar to: DHH Says...F You

I''ve checked the Rails documentation but find no mention of link_to ''external url'' or equivalent. Does rails have a built in method to do this? thanks -Lindsay -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

No, it's not. I'd defer to the list for tips on that one. First thing I'd try if no one else has ideas is checking lsusb and restarting the service. Thank you, David Zomaya Tripp Lite<http://www.tripplite.com/> ________________________________ From: Tom Cooper <tom at cooperfamily.xyz> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 7:00 PM To: David Zomaya Cc: nut-upsuser

Glad to hear it's working, thanks Tom. Network UPS Tools team: is fixing this as simple as me telling you what new UPS protocols are HID-PDC compliant? Thank you, David Zomaya Tripp Lite<http://www.tripplite.com/> ________________________________ From: Tom Cooper <tom at cooperfamily.xyz> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2020 2:42 PM To: David Zomaya Cc: nut-upsuser Subject: Re:

"Can't claim USB device [09ae:3024]: could not detach kernel driver from interface 0: Operation not permitted" Is probably an issue with NUT grabbing the UPS... can you disconnect and reconnect the USB cable and try again? If that fails, maybe a udev rule will help. Thank you, David Zomaya Tripp Lite <http://www.tripplite.com/> ________________________________ From:

My thoughts for a test: * Just have MODE=standalone in nut.conf * Put [tripplite] driver = usbhid-ups port = auto productid=3024 desc = "Tripp Lite Internet600U" In ups.conf * Put LISTEN 127.0.0.1 3493 LISTEN ::1 3493 [tripplite] driver = usbhid-ups port = auto in upsd.conf That may be suboptimal but will probably work for a test. Side

Tested a Ubuntu 18.04 LTS virtual machine with NUT 2.7.4 and a 3024 protocol Tripp Lite UPS (mine is a INTERNET550U, but same protocol) :/etc/nut$ lsusb | grep Tripp Bus 002 Device 004: ID 09ae:3024 Tripp Lite I it got generally working (outputting reasonable responses to upsc, although there are some issues with variables like frequency) by adding productid=3024 to my ups.conf. Like this:

Wow - you're doing all the work for me! Thanks for the rule set.  I can't easily reboot that box just now, so I'm working on reloading the rules. When I try  udevadm control --reload-rules && udevadm trigger May 20 15:19:01 elmer systemd-udevd[3413]: Process '/sbin/crda' failed with exit code 234. May 20 15:19:01 elmer systemd-udevd[3413]: Using default

Borrowing from our friends at Ask Ubuntu ( https://askubuntu.com/a/276637 ) there is. I've modified it for use with a Tripp Lite UPS and 3024 protocol below. Try disconnect/reconnect after and see what happens. :/etc/nut$ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/90-nut-ups.rules # /etc/udev/rules.d/90-nut-ups.rules ACTION=="add", \ SUBSYSTEM=="usb", \ ATTR{idVendor}=="09ae",

I''ve got a form with inputs like user[first_name], user[last_name], etc. When editing the user instead of creating a new one I include a user[id]. I then try and save the object using: user = User.new(params[:user]) user.save() I would *expect* that since I included the user[id] it should do an update and should call validate_on_update. But this doesn''t appear to be the

Hi all, I wanted to write my own generator. What would be a good starting point. Is there any documentation on this, Best practices, etc? Regards, Harm de Laat -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060203/c64c4730/attachment.html

I''m very new to Rails and I''m quite confused if I can practice Rails in offline mode? I''m following the Ruby on Rails Tutorail by Michael Hartl and I noticed that after generating a new app through the command "rails new app_name", "bundle install" is then called to download the gems specified in the Gemfile. What if I don''t have an

Is there anyway to make Rails NOT cache? I''m getting caching in the browser and the server. I have to restart Lighttpd after every view change to see the results. Thanks, phill

Hi Railers, I''m looking for something to do asynchronous encryption - where the encryption and decryption keys are different. This is for a scenario where I want to be able to store some information in the database that can only be decrypted in a different physical location using a secret private key (which will not be stored on the machine doing the encrypting). I''m trying

Hi Railers, I''m past considering myself a noob in Rails land - I think what I''m up against here is more of a bug or an anomaly that I''m unaware of (or that has changed in a recent version). I had a fully working validates_confirmation_of :email_address field in my app - was one of the first things I set up, extremely simple, been working for a long time. Then one

I can''t duplicate this problem on my local machine, but also can''t find any mentions of it on the Gmane archive, so thought I''d just throw in a quick mention in case anyone else comes across it. On Textdrive, using gem rails 1.1, in an app that works fine on my local machine, I get the following error in my production.log: "uninitialized constant

Hello, Does anyone test ZFS on Linux and ACLs? I can't setup POSIX ACLs and any extended even using acl_xattr or acl_tdb. Is any way to use ACLs with ZFS on Linux (Samba 3 or 4)? Best regards /Adrian Berlin --

I''ve been using rails for about 3 months and have a pretty cool app going, but i need to auto-fill some form data. is this possible? i would think so. well anybody to lend me a helping hand, much appreciated. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I just upgraded to 1.1 and I am now getting the wsod for errors that used to display on the screen. E.G. NoMethodError gives wsod. Does any one know what caused this and how I can go back to the previous behavior? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi, i m a web developer(php,ajax). i want to start with ruby on rails. can one suggest me online tutorials for ruby on rails? How would i start with ruby on rails,i knew something about ruby? editor for ruby on rails? Plase..... Thank You. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:55:18 -0700, Dan Kaminsky wrote: > You're right. My argument the is the next build of OpenSSH should be > OpenSSH 7, and the one after that 8, then 9, then 10. No minor releases? > Sure, go ahead. Deprecate the point, > > Do you manage any machines running SSHv1? > If by "running" you mean accepting SSH1, of course not. From a