similar to: disk devices missing but zfs uses them ?

Hiya, Is there any reason (and anything to worry about) if disk target IDs don''t start at 0 (zero). For some reason mine are like this (3 controllers - 1 onboard and 2 PCIe); AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS: 0. c8t0d0 <ATA -ST9160314AS -SDM1 cyl 19454 alt 2 hd 255 sec 63> /pci at 0,0/pci10de,cb84 at 5/disk at 0,0 1. c8t1d0 <ATA -ST9160314AS -SDM1

After having massive problems with a supermicro X7DBE box using AOC-SAT2-MV8 Marvell controllers and opensolaris snv79 (same as described here: http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-66-233341-1) we just start over using new hardware and opensolaris 2008.05 upgraded to snv94. We used again a supermicro X7DBE but now with two LSI SAS3081E SAS controllers. And guess what? Now we get

Dear All, It may be this not the correct mailing list, but I''m having a ZFS issue when a disk is failing. The system is a supermicro motherboard X8DTH-6F in a 4U chassis (SC847E1-R1400LPB) and an external SAS2 JBOD (SC847E16-RJBOD1). It makes a system with a total of 4 backplanes (2x SAS + 2x SAS2) each of them connected to a 4 different HBA (2x LSI 3081E-R (1068 chip) + 2x LSI

Hi all; We have a Solaris 10 U9 x86 instance running on Silicon Mechanics / SuperMicro hardware. Occasionally under high load (ZFS scrub for example), the box becomes non-responsive (it continues to respond to ping but nothing else works -- not even the local console). Our only solution is to hard reset after which everything comes up normally. Logs are showing the following: Jan 8

Hi all, Today a new message has been seen in my system and another freeze has happen to it. The message is : Mar 9 06:20:01 zfs01 failed to configure smp w50016360001e06bf Mar 9 06:20:01 zfs01 mpt: [ID 201859 kern.warning] WARNING: smp_start do passthru error 16 Mar 9 06:20:01 zfs01 scsi: [ID 243001 kern.warning] WARNING: /pci at 0,0/pci8086,3410 at 9/pci1000,3150 at 0 (mpt2): Mar 9

Hi I keep getting these messages on this one box. There are issues with at least one of the drives in it, but since there are some 80 drives in it, that''s not really an issue. I just want to know, if anyone knows, what this kernel message mean. Anyone? Feb 5 19:35:57 prv-backup scsi: [ID 365881 kern.info] /pci at 7a,0/pci8086,340e at 7/pci1000,3140 at 0 (mpt1): Feb 5 19:35:57

Hello, I am trying to compile some code to LLVM IR with a simple "__thread int x" but hitting this error: test.cpp:1:1: error: thread-local storage is unsupported for the current target I'm using both the -S and -emit-llvm options on clang, and was expecting to see "@x = thread_local global i32 0" come out of clang. I am curious why clang even cares about this since

Hi I am looking at some of the existing targets to try to understand more about writing a backend. I was a little puzzled by the use of a method ReplaceUses in *ISelDAGToDAG.cpp (*= most targets, e.g. ARM, X86..). I found its definition in the *GenDAGISel.inc file that is autogenerated from the target description. I can only assume TableGen emits this method definition for every traget.

Hi, I have tried to genertae the key with ssh-keygen -P ( remove the passphrase) And copied it to the traget system. However, it doesn't work. Any insite with the way I am distributing the script. Gs -----Original Message----- From: Martin Pool [mailto:mbp@samba.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 6:53 PM To: Kar, Gouri X. -ND Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org; Johnson, Gary X. -ND; Minyard, Mark X.

Hi Talin, I had a talk in London developer meeting about More Target Independent Bitcode. (You can download the slides from http://llvm.org/devmtg/2011-09-16/) I have been also trying to make bitcode with more higher abstraction level. I made new compilation strategy using more target indepent bitcode as followins, (This didn't consider about Jit or Interpreter like lli) C/C++ source code

Hi, After creating and distributing the private key with "ssh-keygen -P", I am till getting the following error message while I schedule from cron. Only exception is right now , I have only one message which says "You have no controlling tty and no DISPLAY. Cannot read passphrase". Any help is appreciated. Gs You have no controlling tty and no DISPLAY. Cannot read

We recently had a disk fail on one of our whitebox (SuperMicro) ZFS arrays (Solaris 10 U9). The disk began throwing errors like this: May 5 04:33:44 dev-zfs4 scsi: [ID 243001 kern.warning] WARNING: /pci at 0,0/pci8086,3410 at 9/pci15d9,400 at 0 (mpt_sas0): May 5 04:33:44 dev-zfs4 mptsas_handle_event_sync: IOCStatus=0x8000, IOCLogInfo=0x31110610 And errors for the drive were

Hi, I am working on support R_MIPS_HI16 / R_MIPS_LO16 in the new LLD and have a couple of questions. == Q1 In case of MIPS O32 ABI we have to find a matching R_MIPS_LO16 relocation to calculate R_MIPS_HI16 one because R_MIPS_HI16 uses combined addend (AHI << 16) + (short)ALO where AHI is original R_MIPS_HI16 addend and ALO is addend of the matching R_MIPS_LO16 relocation [1]. There are two

Hi, My solaris storage hangs. I login to the console and there is messages[1] display on the console. I can''t login into the console and seems the IO is totally blocked. The system is solaris 10u8 on Dell R710 with disk array Dell MD3000. 2 HBA cable connect the server and MD3000. The symptom is random. It is very appreciated if any one can help me out. Regards, Ding [1] Aug 16

Please check whether you have latest '' MPT '' patch installed on your server ? If not , please install MPT patch . It will fix the issue . Regards, Gowrisankar . On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:30 PM, <zfs-discuss-request at opensolaris.org>wrote: > Send zfs-discuss mailing list submissions to > zfs-discuss at opensolaris.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe

I''m looking at the newly-orderable (via Sun) STEC Zeus SSDs, and they''re outrageously priced. http://www.stec-inc.com/product/zeusssd.php I just looked at the Intel X25-E series, and they look comparable in performance. At about 20% of the cost. http://www.intel.com/design/flash/nand/extreme/index.htm Can anyone enlighten me as to any possible difference between an STEC

Graham Bentley wrote: > Recently swapped out my Sony for a HP DAT and > got this first time in dmesg > > (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): PREVENT ALLOW MEDIUM REMOVAL. CDB: 1e 0 0 0 0 0 > (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error > (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition > (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc:28,0 > (sa0:ahc0:0:6:0): Not ready to ready change, medium may

I have a Solaris 11 build server with build 58 and a zfs scratch filesystem. When trying to upgrade to build 63 using liveupgrade I get the following upon reboot. The machine never comes up. Just keeps giving the error/warning below. Is there something I am doing wrong? WARNING: /ssm at 0,0/pci at 1c,600000/scsi at 1 (mpt0): Received invalid reply frame address 0x480 WARNING: /ssm at

Hello, I am trying to use a 1.5TB Eonstor raid array with FreeBSD 7.0, but I don't understand whether it is the raid or the scsi card or something else that is causing the computer problems when accessing the raid. My problem is that soon after recognizing the attached disk during boot, FreeBSD appears to hang for about 10 seconds and then says ahd0: Recovery Initiated - Card

Hi, Yesterday I got all my disks in two zpool disconected. They are not real disks - LUNS from StorageTek 2530 array. What could that be - a failing LSI card or a mpt driver in 2009.06? After reboot got four disks in FAILED state - zpool clear fixed things with resilvering. Here is how it started (/var/adm/messages) Feb 23 12:39:03 nexus scsi: [ID 365881 kern.info] /pci at 0,0/pci10de,5d at