similar to: Xen bridge network

Hello All, I'm trying to figure out why xen-utils-common 3.2 doesn't suport bridging on multiple interfaces. I've been digging around /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridges. And modified it so that during boot, when executed the script writes into /tmp/netbr file, but I commented out code that actually creates bridges. I discovered that this script is called three times during boot, I

Dear I need create second bridge xenbr1 for separate traffic between my virtual machine , I following this step but show message that Link veth0 is missing, how I can create veth0 ? When I run script for create xenbr1 ./network-bridge netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 start Shwo this message Link veth0 is missing. This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of interfaces that the

Hi, I have taken the long and winding road and indeed it lead me to your door. I need your help, please. My Xen includes 2 guests. Xen itself (10.2.0.52) gets free access to the outside world and to its guests. Both guests however (10.2.0.54/10.2.0.55) see each other but stay under house arrest! Not a single ping manages to go past the bridge (xenbr0) and get an answer from the default gateway

someone recommended that i should give br0 the same hardware address as eno2. I did that, and restarted the vm, and it still does not work. Here is my current host interface config: ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft

I should have what i want to achive. The server is intended as a host for VMs. Our network has multiple VLANs, and the VMs will be connected to different VLANS. The interface eno1 is for host traffic and eno2 is connected to the trunk port of the switch, making the different VLANS availabel to the VMs via the br0. I want to use a VLAN-aware br0, so that I specify in my VM config (on the host

I''ve just installed Xen on a new CentOS 5.1 system, and I can''t seem to make xenbr0 connect to the network. This system has a single physical network card. Apart from creating a few DomU guests, I have not changed any of the configuration. After running network-bridge, xenbr0 and friends are created, but the address and routing info is not moved. James # ip addr

This is my system info: Debian Release: 10.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.4.60-1-pve (SMP w/16 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh

Bernd wrote: > > Laine wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of > > Laine Stump > > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:12 PM > > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > > Cc: Lentes, Bernd > > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge > > network

Hi guys I am trying to keep a linux bridge up even when there is no interface connected to it. Is this possible? br0 has eth13 and eth0 ensalved to it eth0 is up eht13 is down /opt# ip link show br0 25: br0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT group default link/ether 00:0f:20:67:dc:b4 brd

Hello All, I¹ve installed the vanilla shorewall F12, I¹ve got it installed on a couple of other servers with no problems. no matter how I define the zones and interfaces, shorewall logs and allows, rejects or drops only traffic to world. ACCEPT:info net:<myip>/32 $FW icmp Shorewall:world2fw:REJECT:IN=br0 ACCEPT:info world:<myip>/32 $FW icmp

Laine wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On Behalf > Of Laine Stump > Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:57 PM > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Cc: Lentes, Bernd > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge network > setup ? > > On 03/16/2015 01:07 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > >

Hi, I would like to ask concerning problems after installing xen 3.3 on Centos 5.2 I use 2.6.18.8-xen (xen3.3.1 testing - installing with mercurial). After done with make world and make install, I did mkinitrd and placing it in /boot changing the grub and reboot.. succeded I do not install libvirt and the domUs from the previous xen 3.0 (built-in Centos 5.2) are NOT able to start : [root@wing

On 12/16/18 4:59 PM, Marc Haber wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to run a network firewall as a VM on a KVM host. There are > ~ 25 VLANs delivered to the KVM host on three dedicated links, no LACP > or other things. I have the VLANs 100-180 on the host's enp1s0, the VLANs > 200-280 on the host's enp2s0 and the VLANs 300-380 on the host's enp3s0. > > To save

Hi, We have a Dell server with 4 Ethernet interface. I would to aggregate them in a bond. Everything work but the default gateway doesn?t work on the ? bond0 ? interface and I have no links. My configuration: - CentOS 7: :/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts# uname -a Linux nas-mtd2 3.10.0-957.5.1.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Feb 1 14:54:57 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux - NetworkManager disabled:

Laine wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On Behalf > Of Laine Stump > Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:12 PM > To: libvirt-users@redhat.com > Cc: Lentes, Bernd > Subject: Re: [libvirt-users] still possible to use traditional bridge network > setup ? > > On 03/16/2015 10:08 AM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > >

> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gordon Messmer > Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 4:25 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Virtualization Networking > > On 10/03/2016 04:54 AM, TE Dukes wrote: > > I can get the guest to access the internet but have tried every was

On 03/16/2015 01:07 PM, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > Bernd wrote: > >> Laine wrote: >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: sendmail [mailto:justsendmailnothingelse@gmail.com] On >> Behalf Of >>> Laine Stump >>> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 4:12 PM >>> To: libvirt-users@redhat.com >>> Cc: Lentes, Bernd >>>

On Nov 2, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Mike - st257 <silvertip257 at gmail.com> wrote: > But when I try to remove it, I'm either trying to do something _actually_ > not supported or I don't have the proper syntax to accomplish what I want. It doesn?t look like ?ip link? has the syntax to remove an alias, but it can be done via sysfs: # ip link show dev lo 1: lo:

Hi, I would like to run a network firewall as a VM on a KVM host. There are ~ 25 VLANs delivered to the KVM host on three dedicated links, no LACP or other things. I have the VLANs 100-180 on the host's enp1s0, the VLANs 200-280 on the host's enp2s0 and the VLANs 300-380 on the host's enp3s0. To save myself from configuring all VLANs on the KVM host, I'd like to hand the entire

I think this is a bug: CentOS 5.4 using Samba 3.4.7. If the server IP address changes, nmbd complains every few minutes that "There is already a domain master browser" on the old IP address. Although "Chapter 41. Managing TDB Files" states: wins.dat N WINS database iused only when wins support = yes has been set. This gets rebuilt or updated at every restart. that does