similar to: xen-3.0.3-80.el5_3.3 on RHEL 5.3 -- peth0 and xenbr0 don''t exist

I am doubtful that the default bridge is active. When I do following no where the bridge name comes how do I make sure bridge is active. openworld:/etc/xen# ifconfig eth2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:26:b9:82:42:38 inet addr:192.1.100.150 Bcast:172.21.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 inet6 addr: fe80::226:b9ff:fe82:4238/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING

I am posting the message below again because it did not go through last night. Help! Steve Timm -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Steven C. Timm, Ph.D (630) 840-8525 timm@fnal.gov http://home.fnal.gov/~timm/ Fermilab Computing Division, Scientific Computing Facilities, Grid Facilities Department, FermiGrid Services Group, Assistant Group Leader.

Hi all, I finally got my IPSec tunnel from my Fedora firewall system (running Shorewall 4.0.6) to a remote Draytek Router up-and-running, but I''m having difficulties directing traffic through the tunnel. From the output of "racoon -F -f racoon.conf" and the connection status page of the Draytek I can tell the tunnel is UP, but ping and traceroute requests to several hosts

On 11/22/2013 03:47 PM, Sherin A wrote: > > Hello, > > I am not able to see vrbr0 in my box. Can some one help me with this ? . I am trying KVM+libvirt and planing to use Routed mode. I hope this virbr0 must be up for using this . I can give an > strace too. > > OS : Debian , kernel 3.12.0 > libvrit version : 0.9.8 >

On Friday 22 November 2013 04:19 PM, Sherin A wrote: > On Friday 22 November 2013 01:33 PM, Sherin A wrote: >> On Friday 22 November 2013 01:24 PM, Gao feng wrote: >>> On 11/22/2013 03:47 PM, Sherin A wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am not able to see vrbr0 in my box. Can some one help me >>>> with this ? . I am trying

Hello, I am not able to see vrbr0 in my box. Can some one help me with this ? . I am trying KVM+libvirt and planing to use Routed mode. I hope this virbr0 must be up for using this . I can give an strace too. OS : Debian , kernel 3.12.0 libvrit version : 0.9.8 ____________________________________________________________________ root@:~# ifconfig br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr

Hi all, my dom0 is centos5.2 and domU paravirtualized is centos5.1 I can play sound on dom0 but not in domU (name: gasphar), moreover I use wifi as my inet connection and on installing domU cento5.1, I used virt-manager. I know that libvirtd made virbr0 and when changing to xenbr0, I cannot connect to internet but ssh to dom0 is fine! so how do I enable sound device on domU and changing to

On Friday 22 November 2013 01:33 PM, Sherin A wrote: > On Friday 22 November 2013 01:24 PM, Gao feng wrote: >> On 11/22/2013 03:47 PM, Sherin A wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am not able to see vrbr0 in my box. Can some one help me >>> with this ? . I am trying KVM+libvirt and planing to use Routed >>> mode. I hope this virbr0 must be up

Hi, I would like to ask concerning problems after installing xen 3.3 on Centos 5.2 I use 2.6.18.8-xen (xen3.3.1 testing - installing with mercurial). After done with make world and make install, I did mkinitrd and placing it in /boot changing the grub and reboot.. succeded I do not install libvirt and the domUs from the previous xen 3.0 (built-in Centos 5.2) are NOT able to start : [root@wing

I am running Fedora 16 64bit and installed libvirt. I have the VM running with arm emulation with this one issue I can't figure out. I used Virtual Machine Manager to manage the VM and can access its console there. The Ethernet appears to be eth1 and the guest can set an IP on it etc. However, I cannot see any traffic from the Host when dumping any of the interfaces. I've tried

Command just times our for me virt-install --paravirt --vcpus=4 --name server1 --ram 4096 --file /opt/xen-images/hlcnwmmp01.img -x "ks=http://10.203.1.11/kickstart/ks-xen.cfg" --file-size 40 --location http://128.61.111.11/pub/centos/5.4/os/x86_64 -b peth0 Starting install... Retrieving file vmlinuz... | 1.9 MB 00:00 Retrieving file initrd.img...

Updating old CentOS 4 DNS servers to CentOS 5, one of our zones has a number of entries with underscores in. Starting named results in the following error and named refusing to start. masters/example.com.db:33: mail_server.example.com: bad owner name (check-names) I've tried including check-names master ignore; in the options but this isn't making any difference. I've read a lot

I installed 64-bit xen 3.1.0 (from xensource.com tarballs) on three new machines today, using a configuration setup that I''ve used successfully many times before. However, I encountered a new problem. These are Dell Poweredge 1950 servers, by the way. >From lspci 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 12) 08:00.0 Ethernet

On Friday 22 November 2013 01:24 PM, Gao feng wrote: > On 11/22/2013 03:47 PM, Sherin A wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am not able to see vrbr0 in my box. Can some one help me with this ? . I am trying KVM+libvirt and planing to use Routed mode. I hope this virbr0 must be up for using this . I can give an >> strace too. >> >> OS : Debian , kernel 3.12.0

Why is someone not setting up an email server conform RFC's and seems to be you have an ipv6.. so set the ptr record. Hai Linda, I do have ipv4 and ipv6 on my server, and im never blocked.. but i did setup conform all rfcs.. i block servers in the same way. so yes, i did set my reverse for ipv4 and ipv6.. what most people do wrong.. 1) the hostname must have A and RR (PTR) and MX

Why would the samba list be looking for a reverse host name via IPV6? IFAIK I only have an IPv4 addr and reverse addr. I don't know if the original went to the person in france or not. Anyone else getting bounces like this? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 13:19:19 -0700 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem

Hello, I have a nwfilter that I'm using to ensure that libvirt domains can't spoof IPv6 traffic. It looks like this: <filter name='no-ipv6-spoofing' chain='ipv6-ip' priority='-710'> <rule action='return' direction='out' priority='500'> <ipv6 srcipaddr='$IPV6' srcipmask='$IPV6MASK'/> </rule>

> Dear CentOS-Community, > > we are facing the following issue: > > A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which > causes several issues in our setup. Hi, Can you show as the config of eno4? And can you diff the config of eno1 and eno4. Looks like there is a difference somewhere. Regards, Simon > > > This server is equipped with four nics

Hi All, We have a single Centos 5.11 server running a xen hypervisor that went down hard after an extended power outage this weekend. I'm mostly familiar for KVM as that is the majority of what our guests run under and have tried getting up to speed on xen bridging to no avail. The problem is that after the xen server spun back up, the previously defined xen bridges were lost. I've

I''ve setup Xen 3.0.2-2 (binary install) on Ubuntu 6.06, got my domUs up and running, got them connected to the Internet but I can''t even ping to any of these VMs. Now I''m not linux/xen genious but could the problem be that xen-br0 doesn''t have an IPv4 address? (it''s got an IPv6 address) Since I don''t use IPv6 on my network this seems a