similar to: domu state: broken

Hi Booting my Xen Dom0 on Debian Etch (Kernel is the prebuild one from bits.xensource.com), I found that only one cpu core (of two: dual core) is recognized by the (dom0-)Kernel. Googling this issue, I found on xen-devel-list that xen kernel is named smp but isn''t really doing so. Is there any (prebuild) kernel that I can use for smp? Thanks Gregor Reich

Hardware: Dell Poweredge R510 (32G ram, 8 CPU- Xeon) 64bit - xen 4.0.1 stable 64bit - 2.6.32.18 dom0 (.config attached) running Ubuntu 10.04 32 bit - 2.6.18.8 domU (.config attached) running ubuntu 8.04 domU has 3 tap2 disks, on lvm snapshots. domU has 2G mem, 2 VCPU workload on domU - ssh + top running, destroy domain -- This works . But, If i run a heavier workload say postgres db (just

Attached simple patch modifies the rombios and hvmloader Makefiles to default to an 8-way bochs bios for the hvmloader. Is there a reason to not define the mp config table by default for >1 processors (8), in the repository? Seems like using the hvm guest config file can the methodolody to describe a UP guest regardless of the mptables. Defaulting the rombios to MP would allow users to

Hi i have assigned 4 vcpus to windows domu in in the configuration file for that VM but when i start that vm but when i start that machine check it only shows single cpu is there anything which need to defined or declared in configuration for windows domu Thanks _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Hey folks, I''ve encountered a rather interesting/frustrating issue with RHEL6 domU''s and live migration. I have no problems booting a RHEL6 domU using its stock/native kernel on Xen 3.4.1 or Xen 3.4.3. But in terms of live migration, there seems to be a problem when moving from a higher (in terms of CPU MHz) to lower (MHz) system -- even if the higher of the two is a much

Hi, In view of the problems I was having with DomU network timeout after a live migration (I posted that problems here a while ago but never got anything except from private emails) I finally updated my Debian/Squeeze Dom0s last night to a new kernel, from 2.6.32-23 to 2.6.32-26. Now live migration just hangs...Any ideas? Xen-related Debian packages (all from Debian repositary, except drbd

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:32:31AM -0800, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev wrote: > I think Clang should continue to duplicate this information, the same way > we duplicate target datalayout strings. Other than that, sure, we can let > LLVM expand IR operations to libcalls. I don't immediately see a problem > with that. Note that a libcall doesn't necessarily mean using locks. With

Hi, I have compiled xen-unstable (using hg clone http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg). I have successfully booted into the dom0 kernel. output of xm list: Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 932 1 r----- 591.2 But whenever I xm create, I get: # xm create /etc/xen/domu1 Using config file

Hi there! I just fresh-installed Xen on new server, Xeon E5-2620, and noticed following thing: node1 ~ # xl info -n host : node1 release : 3.8.8 version : #1 SMP Tue Apr 23 20:54:17 MSK 2013 machine : x86_64 nr_cpus : 6 max_cpu_id : 5 nr_nodes : 1 cores_per_socket : 6 threads_per_core

Hi, I am trying to migrate a domain (testDomain) from node1 to node2. Here is some information about the problem: node1#: xm migrate testDomain node2 After the command is executed, there is some communication between the node1 and node2 Xen hosts. xfrd daemon (which is forked by xend) is primarily responsible for vm migration and there is error in its log (/var/log/xfrd.log) The exact

Hi, i do some tests with restoring HVM winxp-domU''s. Even, if i restore a saved DomU from a ramdisk, the Restoring-process has only a bandwidth about 23MB/sec: Here a example restoring an 512MB HVM opensuse10.3 DomU ...... [2008-05-07 22:40:12 3314] DEBUG (XendCheckpoint:218) restore:shadow=0x5, _static_max=0x20000000, _static_min=0x0, [2008-05-07 22:40:12 3314] DEBUG (balloon:132)

I ran some iperf tests today and it looks like the etherbridge is the limiting factor on throughput. In the beforetime, I saw great throughput to the VMs; over 800 Mbps. With the bridge, the numbers are in the 400s somewhere. Is this the speed I can expect from the bridge? Is there some tuning I should try, or another way to get more bandwidth into the VMs? This is with xen-2.0, 2.4.27-xen0

Hi Guys, Now I am using Xen-4.0.0. I need to attach CDROM from ISO files to vitual machines when they are running. The VMs contain RHEL4.6, Windows Server 2003 32bit and Windows Server 2006 64bit. The disk configuration of the VMs is: disk = [ ''tap:vhd:/guest/SS_test/vhd/hmi-100130.vhd,hda,w''] (1) When I attach a CDROM to RHEL4.6 VM with the command: virsh

Hi Guys, Now I am using Xen-4.0.0. I need to attach CDROM from ISO files to vitual machines when they are running. The VMs contain RHEL4.6, Windows Server 2003 32bit and Windows Server 2006 64bit. The disk configuration of the VMs is: disk = [ ''tap:vhd:/guest/SS_test/vhd/hmi-100130.vhd,hda,w''] (1) When I attach a CDROM to RHEL4.6 VM with the command: virsh

Hi, all When I type "xm list" command, It''s always display State is Blocked. During OS boot, State is Running, a few seconds later, State changes into Blocked and always Blocked. Why??? linux-jx4z:/ # xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 1317 2 r----- 75.5

Hello I have trouble with Quard Core Opteron and windows 2008(x86). By the way Windows device manager show 4 processors, BUT task manager show only one core. I found that my problem is not new. But solutions, provided by those people did not helped me. By the way, my windows is enterprise version, and as far as I know, it allows up to 8 processor sockets, so the trouble is not, that windows

This patch modifies the physinfo hcall to export NUMA CPU and Memory topology information. The new physinfo hcall is integrated into libxc and xend (xm info specifically). Included in this patch is a minor tweak to xm-test''s xm info testcase. The new fields in xm info are: nr_nodes : 4 mem_chunks : node0:0x0000000000000000-0x0000000190000000

I have a self built system using an Intel D 920 processor and a MB that supports VT. I''m able to run HVM domains fine, but have trouble getting multiple VCPUs for these domains. Here is an example of one of my configs. # -*- mode: python; -*- #============================================================================ # Python configuration setup for ''xm create''. #

Hi folks, I met a problem: when 6 VM reboot at the same time, 3:00 morning, the Dom0 reboot it self: Xen version is 4.0.0, VMs are windows 2003 with redhat pv, they will update and reboot itself every 3:00 AM. # last ... ... admin pts/0 10.247.1.1 Fri Jun 25 03:40 - 04:30 (00:50) reboot system boot 2.6.31.13 Fri Jun 25 11:16 (00:-3) admin pts/0

Hi folks, I met a problem: when 6 VM reboot at the same time, 3:00 morning, the Dom0 reboot it self: Xen version is 4.0.0, VMs are windows 2003 with redhat pv, they will update and reboot itself every 3:00 AM. # last ... ... admin pts/0 10.247.1.1 Fri Jun 25 03:40 - 04:30 (00:50) reboot system boot 2.6.31.13 Fri Jun 25 11:16 (00:-3) admin pts/0