similar to: Windows HVM - orderly shutdown

Hi all, Sometimes the process cdrommon use 99,8% of CPU and the result is that all vms becames very slow. I killed the process and now everything is fine but I can''t live migrate VMS. I found this problem also in this citrix thread: http://forums.citrix.com/thread.jspa?messageID=1475962 <http://forums.citrix.com/thread.jspa?messageID=1475962&tstart=0#1475962>

Trying to boot my Thinkpad T30 with Solaris snv_81 xVM it get the error message This version of Solaris xVM does not support this hardware The output of "echo ::interrupts | mdb -k" while booted without xVM is bash-3.2# echo ::interrupts | mdb -k IRQ Vector IPL(lo/hi) Bus Share ISR(s) 0 0x20 14/14 - 1 cbe_fire 1 0x21 5/5 ISA 1 i8042_intr 3 0x23

Hi -- I wanted to boot s10 HVM in 64-bit mode but it always boots in 32-bit mode. Is there a special grub entry to boot s10 HVM domU in 64-bit mode? Or is it HVM loader? The grub entry is like this title Solaris 10 5/08 s10x_u5wos_01 X86 kernel /platform/i86pc/multiboot module /platform/i86pc/boot_archive s10.py file is as follows :- import os, re arch = os.uname()[4] if

Bouncing a thread from the device drivers list: http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=357176 Does anybody know if OpenSolaris will support this new Supermicro card, based on the Marvell 88SE6480 chipset? It''s a true PCI Express 8 port JBOD SAS/SATA controller with pricing apparently around $125. If it works with OpenSolaris it sounds pretty much perfect. --------------

After having to reset my i-ram card, I can no longer import my raidz pool on 2008.05. Also trying to import the pool using the zpool.cache causes a kernel panic on 2008.05 and B89 (I''m waiting to try B90 when released). So I have 2 options: * Wait for a release that can import after log failure... (no time frame ATM) * Use a util that removes the log vdev info from the remaining vdevs.

https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=481859&#481859 https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=453572&#453572 This is a timebomb waiting to strike so many people who like do daily snapshot backups and keep them for few weeks and not realizing their snapshots are useless if they had accidentally mess up some boot related file earlier on. Another scenario you mess

Hi experts, I have few issues about ZFS and virtualization: [b]Virtualization and performance[/b] When filesystem traffic occurs on a zpool containing only spindles dedicated to this zpool i/o can be distributed evenly. When the zpool is located on a lun sliced from a raid group shared by multiple systems the capability of doing i/o from this zpool will be limited. Avoiding or limiting i/o to

Hi, I have problems getting lvm to work on my domU. The dom0 is a CentOS 5 installed on lvm. I''ve added two extra lv, one for root and one for swap. [root@surr log]# lvscan ACTIVE ''/dev/VolGroup00/dom0vol'' [3.91 GB] inherit ACTIVE ''/dev/VolGroup00/dom0swap'' [1.94 GB] inherit ACTIVE

Hi developers, I met some domU issues and the log suggests missing interrupt. Details from here: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/users/263938#263938 In summary, this is the suspicious log: (XEN) vmsi.c:122:d32767 Unsupported delivery mode 3 I''ve checked the code in question and found that mode 3 is an ''reserved_1'' mode. I want to trace down the source of this

Hi all! Anyone tried to install vmware on a xen system (ie. vmware player on dom0?). David _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi list, Saw that there''s a patch for xenserver 5.6fp1 which should fix this: http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX129267 Anybody know if/when this will happen on XCP? I have the same problem - disk usage remains the same after snapshot deletion - this is in the log on the pool master: vhd-util: libvhd::vhd_validate_footer: invalid footer cookie: ÇÇÇÇÇÇÇÇ This guy has the same

hi all - thoughts or pointes to the procedure for above... rich

Last night I upgraded from b127 to b130 and now I can''t mark autostart domains: # virsh autostart lunar-1 error: Failed to mark domain lunar-1 as autostarted error: failed to serialize S-Expr: (domain (on_crash restart) (uuid 91c21040-2098-bc0d-b401-3908f3a21667) (bootloader_args) (vcpus 1) (name lunar-1) (on_poweroff destroy) (on_reboot restart) (cpus ( Searching the archives

Hi all! I''m trying to create a Windows domU setting vcpu=2 and cpus= "0,2", but xm vcpu-list show the second vcpu in paused state all the time. Is it necessary to use any additional parameter? Thanks in advance. Regards, Daniel -- Daniel Bareiro - System Administrator Fingerprint: BFB3 08D6 B4D1 31B2 72B9 29CE 6696 BF1B 14E6 1D37 Powered by Debian GNU/Linux Etch - Linux

Greetings, Last April, in this discussion... http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=143517 ...we never found out how (or if) the Sun 6120 (T4) array can be configured to ignore cache flush (sync-cache) requests from hosts. We''re about to reconfigure a 6120 here for use with ZFS (S10U4), and the evil tuneable zfs_nocacheflush is not going to serve us well (there is a ZFS

Has anyone else noticed a significant zfs performance deterioration when running recent opensolaris bits? My 32-bit / 768 MB Toshiba Tecra S1 notebook was able to do a full opensolaris release build in ~ 4 hours 45 minutes (gcc shadow compilation disabled; using an lzjb compressed zpool / zfs on a single notebook hdd p-ata drive). After upgrading to 2007-05-25 opensolaris release bits

I want to import my zpool''s from FreeBSD 8.0 in OpenSolaris 2009.06. After reading the few posts (links below) I was able to find on the subject, it seems like it there is a differences between FreeBSD and Solaris. FreeBSD operates on directly on the disk and Solaris creates a partion and uses that... is that right? Is it impossible for OpenSolaris to use zpool''s from FreeBSD?

I''m not seeing the problem that Fan Zhao is reporting, instead I get this one. Not sure if ti''s the same one or a different problem... This happens with my simple-guest [i.e. not using hvmloader, as I described before]. This worked fine yesterday. (XEN) event_channel.c:178:d0 EVTCHNOP failure: domain 0, error -22, line 178 (XEN) bad shared page: 0 (XEN) domain_crash_sync called

hi, i´m using fedora core 6 and want to build xen 3.1 from source for the 2.6.20 kernel. how can i build xen with the existing kernel-config from /boot (e.g. config-2.6.20-1.2948.fc6xen) and an installed kernel-devel (source) package? is it good to use this config or should i create a new one? i searched the net and haven´t found any howto to build xen from source with newer kernel versions and

Hi: we have following setup: 1. 2.6.16-33-based Xen 3.0.3/Xen-3.0.4 DOM-0 kernels. 2. Using LILO-mbootpack from USB we boot Xen-->DOM-0 setup 3. We mount harddisk and try to install xp.hvm While,we are successful with FCs as DOM-U, for XP we get, VBD (768) could not be connected. We do have max_loop count to 64 and enough loop devices. Note that above error is consistent on both 3.0.3