similar to: Odd issue with locked directories and Mac OS X

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 300 matches similar to: "Odd issue with locked directories and Mac OS X"

2009 Oct 01
0
patch: --force-change for hard links
Hi All! rsync-3.0.6 with fileflags.diff under FreeBSD 8.0-RC1: if there is a file with uchg or schg flag in source directory and it's hard-linked (usual case for /usr/bin), then rsync cannot create the link in destination directory. Error message: rsync: link "/tmp/s/a" => b failed: Operation not permitted (1) The problem is that it's not allowed to link a *chg'ed file.
2012 May 07
0
Solved problem with hard links and schg flag under FreeBSD
Hi! Using rsync under FreeBSD with hard links and files having schg set result in EPERM "Operation not permitted". This behavior can be observed if rsyncing /usr/bin/. The patch fileflags.diff tries to deal with this situation but changes the flags of the parent directory only. It doesn't change the flags of the files itself. do_link() in syscall.c has to be fixed. The
2008 Apr 14
0
[PATCH] xattrs not set on locked files that already exist on target
Working with rsync 3.0.2, it appears that rsync isn't unlocking files before setting the file attributes when those files already exist. This generates error messages on subsequent such as: rsync: rsync_xal_set: lsetxattr("locked_file","test_xattr") failed: Operation not permitted (1) rsync: rsync_xal_clear:
2008 Jun 25
2
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5565] New: xattrs not set on locked files that already exist on target
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5565 Summary: xattrs not set on locked files that already exist on target Product: rsync Version: 3.0.3 Platform: Other OS/Version: Mac OS X Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
2008 Feb 15
4
Revised flags patch
Hi, first of all, sorry for taking so long. Unfortunately, some other tasks kept coming up. Anyway, attached is the version of the flags patch, that is based on the one I'm using with 2.6.9. It is against the rsync-3.0.0pre9 release. I've included the option name change from the repository, so the option is now called --fileflags. Improved from the previously distributed version is the
2011 Mar 16
3
[Bug 8019] New: Various improvements to the fileflags patch
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8019 Summary: Various improvements to the fileflags patch Product: rsync Version: 3.0.8 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: mike at bombich.com
2008 Mar 04
1
Several changes missing from [HEAD] fileflags.diff
Looking at http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/patches/fileflags.diff -- It looks like the changes from fileflags-fixes.diff patch were applied to the patch from http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-patches-3.0.0.tar.gz , but this entire chunk of the that original diff file was lost: > diff -up a/config.h.in b/config.h.in > --- a/config.h.in > +++ b/config.h.in > @@ -64,6 +64,9 @@
2011 Jan 11
1
--detect-renamed for mac users : proposition of a modification
Hello, Object of my mail : 1/ stick a problem of incompatibylity between 2 patches (fileflags.diff & detect-renamed.diff) 2/ proposition of a correction I wanted to run rsync on a mac (OS X 10.6.5) with the --detect-renamed option. I therefore tried to compile rsync with the 3 relevant patches : - fileflags.diff - crtimes.diff - detect-renamed.diff But the patch detect-renamed.diff is
2013 Oct 10
2
Cannot build rsync 3.1.0 on MacOSX 10.8.5 with fileflags patch
Returning to this list after a long hiatus: rsync 3 has been working very well for me for many years, as a supplementary backup tool for MacOSX. However, attempting to build the new 3.1.0 release on a brand new Mountain Lion box with my standard 'fileflags' and 'crimes' patches applied, make fails, reporting that 'force_change' is undeclared. In fact, the problem occurs
2004 Apr 27
1
[PATCH] Inplace option for rsync
Hi, I have written a 'smallish' patch to implement the --inplace option as discussed on this mailing list at various points in the past. It makes a small modification to the sender algorithm so that it won't ask the receiver to relocate blocks from earlier in the file when running with the --inplace option. I would appreciate any testing and feedback people can provide! I
2009 Mar 11
0
rsyserr is occasionally dropping receiver messages
Typically rsync exits and reports an error such as: rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes [sender]: Broken pipe (32) rsync: write failed on "/Volumes/Backup/big_file.dmg": No space left on device (28) rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (67174 bytes received so far) [sender] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at /src/ rsync-3.0.5/io.c(600)
2010 Dec 18
0
Compilation for mac OS X with detect-renamed.diff patch
Hello, I need to run rsync on a mac (OS X 10.6.5) with the --detect-renamed option available. I therefore started to compile rsync with the 3 relevant patches (in my opinion) : - fileflags.diff - crtimes.diff - detect-renamed.diff Here are my exact compile instructions : patch -p1 <patches/fileflags.diff patch -p1 <patches/crtimes.diff patch -p1 <patches/detect-renamed.diff
2013 Oct 24
0
patch for combining detect-renamed and fileflags patches (fwd)
Dear collegaues, please evaluate the patch attached, which allow to use both --detect-renamed and --fileflags extra features. This is meta-patch which sould be applied to detect-renamed. fileflags patch should be applied first, following by the modified detect-renamed patch. It is included in current FreeBSD port, but it seems it would be much more useful to be supported by samba
2007 Oct 13
1
Using pre2 for backing up a mac
With the new ACL+xattr support and fake super (I'm glad this made it in!), it seems like my dream of being able to use rsync --link-dest to backup my mac is almost within reach! If you take a look at http://blog.plasticsfuture.org/2006/03/05/the-state-of-backup-and- cloning-tools-under-mac-os-x/ you can get an overview of the meta-data which needs to be saved for faithful backups on
2008 Jan 26
2
dovecot HEAD, assertion failed after 7193:e5af14239137 changeset
Hi! Using HEAD, and after the 7193:e5af14239137 changeset (Store physical message sizes also to dovecot-uidlist if needed.) I'm getting this: (gdb) bt full #0 0x0a0a80dd in kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.41.0 No symbol table info available. #1 0x0a0e04a7 in abort () at /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/abort.c:65 p = (struct atexit *) 0x84992000 cleanup_called = 0 mask =
2008 Feb 20
1
(message_parser_parse_next_block): assertion, failed: (ctx->input->eof)
dovecot 1.1b16 Feb 19 23:32:41 hill dovecot: IMAP(username): Disconnected for inactivity bytes=29831/872 Feb 19 23:32:41 hill dovecot: IMAP(username): file message-parser.c: line 764 (message_parser_parse_next_block): assertion failed: (ctx->input->eof) Feb 19 23:32:41 hill dovecot: child 60831 (imap) killed with signal 6 # gdb /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap imap.60831.hill.core GNU
2004 Apr 11
1
fchmod in do_mkstemp? (patch included)
Why is do_mkstemp fchmod-ing the temporary file? I was not able to figure this out from the CVS logs or my searches in the mail archives. Currently, do_mkstemp does this (*): mkstemp temporary file (which leaves it with 0600) fchmod temporary file (final perm & 0700) And then later it gets renamed to the final name and permissions set to what they are supposed to be. (*)
2012 Sep 28
1
Patch for GPFS support
Hi all My apologies for dragging up a very old mail from the depths of the rsync archives: http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2008-October/021963.html I'm trying to use Ronnie's patch to get rsync to copy my GPFS NFSv4 ACLs. I'm having trouble building Ronnie's gpfs.c though - it turns out my programming isn't up to a challenge greater than "configure; make"!
2024 Jun 11
1
4.20: case (in)sensitive is broken
10.06.2024 20:55, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote: > Here is the fix. Not sure if it breaks anything else (yet) :-). Wow. With the additional info from my previous email in mind, it looks like there's something else going on here. Namely, why the issue happens only if unix extensions is *excplicitly* turned off, while doesn't happen when it is turned off implicitly due to wide links?
2024 Jun 10
2
4.20: case (in)sensitive is broken
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 09:59:14PM +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >07.06.2024 20:52, Jeremy Allison wrote: > >>Fair enough. Can you post a minimal smb.conf and directory >>setup that reproduces the problem and how to demo it with smbclient >>command lines please ? I know I'm asking to be spoon-fed but my time for >>Samba these days is quite limited and