similar to: New mailing list manager

The openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org mailing list has just been migrated for majordomo to mailman. You will be able to edit your subscription information through the webpage at: http://www.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-unix-dev To actually make changes, you will need a password. You can request the one that has been automatically assigned to you from the page above. Please report any

We have locally collected good experience the last few weeks using procmail-spam filtering, inclduing spamassassin to the procmail filters. The last two spams that went past the majordomo filters (the "traditional ones I've been using) through to R-devel both were not delivered to me, be but caught by the filters. I have now collected a bit more of a week experience using the new scheme

Hi! In the process of making mysystem work again, having just done a reinstall of 6.3 x86_64. I have a considerable collection of procmail recipes for filtering mail in various ways, and since the upgrade none of 'em is working. procmail passes every mail thru spambayes, which gives back a rating on spamminess. this happens, so it's not as if procmail is simply punting. that is

I have a procmail recipe that does the majority of my heavy lifting for my mailing lists. It's pretty straightforward, but as I understand it, this isn't something sieve can do: # [ ] contains a space and a tab :0 * 9876543210^0 ^(List-Id:.*<|X-Mailing-List:[ ]*)\/[-A-z0-9_+]+ * 9876543210^0 ^(List-Post:[ ]*(<mailto:)?|List-Owner:[ ]*(<mailto:)?owner-)\/[-A-Z0-9_+]+ *

I have moved the R-announce mailing list from the Majordomo software to a combination of procmail & mailman an hour or so ago. You find a link in the footer of this message giving an URL where you can modify your subscription, look at the archives (everything from the beginning in 1997) and more. CHANGE: Postings to R-announce are now moderated, ie. they have to be approved by a list

I have moved the R-announce mailing list from the Majordomo software to a combination of procmail & mailman an hour or so ago. You find a link in the footer of this message giving an URL where you can modify your subscription, look at the archives (everything from the beginning in 1997) and more. CHANGE: Postings to R-announce are now moderated, ie. they have to be approved by a list

-- >>>> This is a multipart message in MIME format **** Command 'this' not recognized. >>>> >>>> --_NextPart_000_1ADDC402 **** Command '--_nextpart_000_1addc402' not recognized. >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; **** Command 'content-type:' not recognized. >>>> charset="iso-8859-1" **** Command

Three new mailing lists are now available: FreeBSD-AFS FreeBSD-ISDN FreeBSD-Java FreeBSD-AFS: porting AFS to FreeBSD FreeBSD-ISDN: this list was previously hosted by muc.ditec.de and has now been moved to FreeBSD.org. FreeBSD-Java: porting the JDK and JVM to FreeBSD These three lists, and the freebsd-chat mailing list, are also the first to introduce our new subscription policy.

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 03:14:51PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > dmarc_moderation_action (privacy): Action to take when anyone posts > > to the list from a domain with a DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy. > > > > Wrap Message -- applies the "from_is_list Wrap Message" transformation > > to these messages. > > > > from_is_list

Does CentOS 5.6 have a mailing list manager like ecartis or majordomo? I want to set up mailing lists for my server in the cloud for three domains that I own. What mailing list managers do yourecommend, and where can they be found? I don't ming compiling source code. Thanks, -- John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc. http://www.abilitiessoft.com Madison,

Hi all, I've just migrated my mail system from procmail to managesieve/sieve and I'm having trouble trying to duplicate a could of rules I used to use in my procmail config. One particular rule would be this: :0 Wfh * ^Sender: owner-scientific-linux-devel at LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV | (sed -e '/^Subject:/ s/\[SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL\] *//g'| sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/Precedence:

-- >>>> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. **** Command 'this' not recognized. >>>> >>>> ------=_NextPart_000_0009_9A38C670.FD8DF8D3 **** Command '------=_nextpart_000_0009_9a38c670.fd8df8d3' not recognized. >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii **** Command 'content-type:' not recognized.

Some threads just go on too long. Personally I think a troll has hijacked the main centos list again and is inducing food fight behaviours while that troll perfectly 'innocently' asserting that it is just respoding to all email. see: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4216011961522818645 for a discussion of the problem of 'capture' in FOSS projects. But if one loses

From the digest: On Aug 14, 2007, at 1:04 PM, dovecot-request at dovecot.org wrote: other messages cut out? > > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:03:58 +0200 > From: martin f krafft <madduck at madduck.net> > Subject: Re: [Dovecot] use of deliver from procmail advisable? > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Message-ID: <20070814170358.GA17390 at

A few of you have expressed the desire for a "digest" subscription to the R-help and/or R-devel mailing lists. {This may be especially useful if you leave for vacation etc}. These ``digest lists'' have now been put into place, i.e., if you don't want to get as much e-mail from R-help or R-devel as currently, but still would want to be in touch, you could now consider

-- >>>> ----------340628352367234 **** Command '----------340628352367234' not recognized. >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" **** Command 'content-type:' not recognized. >>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit **** Command 'content-transfer-encoding:' not recognized. >>>> >>>> Test =) ****

On 5/9/17, 11:25 AM, "dovecot on behalf of Christian Kivalo" <dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org on behalf of ml+dovecot at valo.at> wrote: Am 9. Mai 2017 17:47:13 MESZ schrieb Adam Shostack <adam at shostack.org>: >Hi, > >Is there a clean way to match on an email address the way procmail >^TO_ did? that was a macro which expanded to

On 5/9/17, 12:38 PM, "Adam Shostack" <adam at shostack.org> wrote: On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 11:27:22AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: | On 5/9/17, 11:25 AM, "dovecot on behalf of Christian Kivalo" <dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org on behalf of ml+dovecot at valo.at> wrote: | Am 9. Mai 2017 17:47:13 MESZ schrieb Adam Shostack <adam at

Suddenly, quite a few people have jumped in and started active experementation and discussion about Tarkin, as well as playing with the very rudimentary test-of-concept 3d wavelet coder jack, hatamoto and I hacked on last year. For your use, I've added a new mailing list, tarkin-dev@xiph.org, for discussion and hacking on Tarkin. The list is run, linked and archived at xiph.org like the

For some reason all headers for mails coming from this list are coming from @Xiph.org, not @xiph.org like all the other xiph lists. Any chance this small discrepancy with all the other xiph lists can be fixed for aesthetic and procmail reasons ? :) (This mail is just as much a test for seeing if my changed procmail catches this, btw) Thanks Thomas Dave/Dina : future TV today ! -