similar to: 2009 Google Summer of Code

Hi, I am sorry that just now I give the wrong URL which is a private mood. The next URLs are right: Update the SAFCode project to the new LLVM API http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/student_proposal/show/google/gsoc2010/easyqiu/t127038894856 Check bounds overflow bugs in C programs based on LLVM http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/student_proposal/show/google/gsoc2010/easyqiu/t126993884556 ABCD:

Dear prospective GSoC students! I want to inform that this year LLVM participates in the Google Summer of Code program. The application period for GSOC begins on March 29th (check the detailed program timeline at http://socghop.appspot.com/document/show/gsoc_program/google/gsoc2010/faqs#timeline). Now it's a good time to discuss would-be projects on the relevant mailing lists. You can find

Hello, Please pardon me if this is off topic, but I thought I ought to introduce myself. I submitted an application (aka student proposal) to OpenSSH via GSoC on Thursday (2009-04-02 19:39:21Z). Of course, I cannot know if it will be accepted, but in any case, here is the abstract for anybody on the list who may be interested in offering feedback: The objective of the OpenSSH sftp(1)

Hello, I apologize if this isn't the right place to post about the Google Summer of Code; if so, I would appreciate guidance toward the correct list. If this is the correct list, I would appreciate answers to the message below. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Jawaad Ahmad <jawaadahmad32 at webster.edu> To: djm at openssh.com Subject: OpenSSH GSoC Project Date: Thu, 19 Mar

Hi, Here are my submitted proposals, and they are still in progress. Wellcome your comments, if you have some interest in the topics. Update the SAFCode project to the new LLVM API http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/student_proposal/private/google/gsoc2010/easyqiu/t127038894856 Check bounds overflow bugs in C programs based on LLVM

yiqiuping1986 wrote: > Hi， John Criswell！ > You have said to me that SAFECode had not been maintained for several > years, Just to clarify, SAFECode *has* been and *is* maintained (primarily by me). The release_26 branch in the SVN repository works with LLVM 2.6, and mainline is working (with some regressions) with the upcoming LLVM 2.7. You can subscribe to the SVA Commits mailing list

On 2020/08/05 16:17, raf wrote: > The problem is when, for example, you only have > scp/sftp access to a remote server, such as your bank, > and you use WinSCP to transfer transaction files to > them to be actioned (people do this where I work), and > the bank hasn't properly protected themselves from this > "vulnerability". I really hope all banks do take this >

Hi, John I have modified my proposal based on your suggestion. Wellcom your comments! The URL of my proposal is: http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/student_proposal/private/google/gsoc2010/easyqiu/t127038894856 Best Regards! Qiuping 2010-04-08 yiqiuping1986 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, We are delighted to accept Carlos Silva's proposal to renovate sftp(1) as part of the Google Summer of Code. Many of the ~40 applications we received were of high quality and choosing the best one from the top five was particularly difficult. Unfortunately, since this is our first time through the GSoC and because we only have one "full-time" mentor (me), we are only able to

I almost never use bare 'scp' or 'sftp' anymore; I start with either 'rsync' or, if 'rsync' is not present and not installable on one end or the other, the "tar-over-bare-ssh" approach: ``` tar cf - localpath | ssh remote.host 'cd remotepath && tar xvf -' ``` I'd be in favor of one of the following: 1. 'scp' goes away, and

On Jan 24 03:47, Malcolm wrote: > Quoting Chris High <highc at us.ibm.com>: > > > caught my eye. Do you see any 'advantage' to using sftp with an untrusted > > server? If so, any thoughts about making an easy way to disable scp both > > client and server side when doing an installation? > > SFTP allows file resume, while scp does not. If this

Hi, I was thinking about the difficulties and complexities of using chroot in scp or sftp-server, in order to limit the user in which files they can access. I've seen a lot of arguments about how it is pointless to try and secure scp or sftp (also from a logging perspective) because if we allow SSH access, the user can simply provide their own scp or sftp binary, that does not do the

On Tue, 2020-06-23 at 08:06 +0200, Markus Friedl wrote: > I had something in mind like this for years, but with slightly > different steps: > My naive approach would be to keep the scp user interface and switch > to the sftp protocol internally. We could add a -M [scp|sftp] option > to scp and select the internal protocol. Later we switch the default > from scp to sftp. > No

Dear all, The information about accepted projects for this year was just announced. Please look at http://socghop.appspot.com/org/home/google/gsoc2009/llvm for comprehensive list of them. SoC students: first of all, I would like to congratulate you with acceptance of your proposals! You did great job answering to comments and refining your proposals! Now it seems you can update the texts of your

Dear prospective GSoC Students! Please note, that you won't receive any reviews of your proposals from SoC webapp automatically. You **need to explicitly** subscribe for them. Please do it now and respond to requests / comments already made in some of applications. Thanks! -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Hello all, I've taken a brief skim of the archives available on theaimsgroup and talked to some others regarding the ideas on chroot SSH/SFTP/SCP functionality. I've also investigated a few of the various patches out for chroot sftp|scp|ssh and am a bit of a loss at finding 'an elegant solution' to the problem. Bearing in mind the excellent starting ground of John Furman's

Hi! I created a blog which will be kept up to date with my progress on the Summer Of Code project "renovate sftp(1)". I'm really pleased to work on OpenSSH, and everyone is invited to check out the blog, comment on it, and hopefully i'll reply to all comments :) Thanks! Cheers Carlos Silva

Hi, my goal: sftp/scp only access, without the need for linux users. I want to provide 10 sftp/scp directories to 10 people. Let's call this "virtual account" I don't want to create linux users for each of them. I would like to create one linux user (backup_user). In his home-directory will be 10 directories. For each "virtual account" one directory. Every

Hi， John Criswell！ You have said to me that SAFECode had not been maintained for several years, now I have submitted my proposal for updating the SAFCode project to the new LLVM APIs. If you are still interested in the topic and willing to guid my project, I will be very happy. Now I'm waiting for you comments. Here is my proposal:

Hi, On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 08:26:39PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 12:00:48PM -0800, Jim Knoble wrote: > > 3. 'scp' stays, but becomes the CLI for SFTP, and the SCP protocol breaks. > > Why does "scp becomes the CLI for SFTP" necessitate "the SCP protocol > breaks"? The way scp works today is "run ssh to the remote,