similar to: TBOOT and extlinux

Hi, Can you use pxelinux.0 for tboot? THx

There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older pr_warning in the kernel source tree. Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files. This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate define pr_warning for that directory tree and pr_warn is not used in tools/. Done with 'sed s/\bpr_warning\b/pr_warn/' and some emacsing. Miscellanea: o Coalesce formats and

There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older pr_warning in the kernel source tree. Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files. This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate define pr_warning for that directory tree and pr_warn is not used in tools/. Done with 'sed s/\bpr_warning\b/pr_warn/' and some emacsing. Miscellanea: o Coalesce formats and

There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older pr_warning in the kernel source tree. Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files. This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate define pr_warning for that directory tree and pr_warn is not used in tools/. Done with 'sed s/\bpr_warning\b/pr_warn/' and some emacsing. Miscellanea: o Coalesce formats and

New versions of tboot support ACPI GAS (Generic Address Structure) for handling sleep states. This required a change to the tboot_shared_t data structure that is not backwards compatible. This patch requires that new version makes use of GAS when invoking tboot on shutdown. Signed-off-by: Shane Wang <shane.wang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@intel.com> diff

On 01/08/2013, at 24:37, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Daniel O'Connor <doconnor at gsoft.com.au> wrote: >> Hi, >> I am trying to create a hybrid ISO image for FreeBSD 9.2 using syslinux 6.01 and isohybrid.pl I found at http://www.overclockix.com/sources/isohybrid.pl (I know there is a C version in syslinux but I

Hi, I have made the for-centos-v5 branch available on git://xenbits.xen.org/people/dvrabel/linux.git This is based on 3.4.54 and includes the following additional fixes (since the for-centos-v4 branch). * x86/xen: during early setup, only 1:1 map the ISA region Fixes a boot failure if tboot is used. * xen/evtchn: avoid a deadlock when unbinding an event channel Fixes a potential deadlock by

This patch updates the tboot tarfile used by the optional tboot-* build targets to be the latest one in the Trusted Boot SourceForge site. Please include this patch in 1.3. Joe # HG changeset patch # User Joseph Cihula <joseph.cihula@intel.com> # Date 1215027500 25200 # Node ID 1877486e4c371c9d3fe52671cdcb0a13feafefa7 # Parent 08f77df14cba8e2dfe580779bb9ca2f64e1ae0ae Update tboot tarfile

To enable eventual removal of pr_warning This makes pr_warn use consistent for arch/x86 Prior to this patch, there were 46 uses of pr_warning and 122 uses of pr_warn in arch/x86 Miscellanea: o Coalesce a few formats and realign arguments o Convert a couple of multiple line printks to single line Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe at perches.com> --- arch/x86/kernel/amd_gart_64.c

On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Daniel O'Connor <doconnor at gsoft.com.au> wrote: > > On 01/08/2013, at 24:37, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> The Perl version should also be in the source tree >> (utils/isohybrid.in) and built in the archives (util/isohybrid.pl) >> which I'd recommend using everything from the 6.01 binary/source >>

I have a 6.5 box that failed to boot after a kernel update. The reason is the first arg on the kernel line: title CentOS (2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.x86_64) root (hd0,0) kernel /tboot.gz ro root=/dev/mapper/vol0-lvol1 intel_iommu=on rd_NO_LUKS LANG=en_US.UTF-8 rd_NO_MD SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 crashkernel=auto rd_NO_DM KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=us rd_LVM_LV=vol0/lv ol3

This adds a boolean boot parameter to xen to allow reserved memory regions to be added to the iommu mappings for dom0. The parameter is "iommu_include_reserved" and is off by default. A warning is also traced when incorrect RMRR to system memory map values are detected. This is being added to address some incorrect BIOS''s that do not report correctly the requied reserved memory

flight 10626 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/10626/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 16 guest-start.2 fail in 10623 REGR. vs. 10621 Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 4 xen-install fail

All, We met several system failures on different hardware platforms, which are all caused by VT-d fault. err 1: disk is corrupted by VT-d fault on SATA. err 2: Dom0 kernel panics at booting, which is caused VT-d fault on UHCI. err 3, Dom0 complains disk errors while creating HVM guests. The culprit would be changeset 19054 "x86_64: Remove statically-partitioned Xen heap.". Detailed

Hi all, This is our bi-weekly test report for Xen-unstable tree. There are 6 new bug found in this two weeks. And there are 3 bugs had fixed in past two weeks. We use Pv_ops(xen/stable-2.6.32.x) as Dom0 in our testing. Status Summary ==================================================================== Feature Result

>Maybe it is obsolete??? Who knows...However, I found ubuntu-server-xen and installed >that instead. However, I installed, as far as I can say, all xen packages and now I''m >looking for some sort of a HowTo. Haven''t found one yet for Ubuntu Server 9.04 aka >Jaunty. Shouldn''t I need a XEN-Kernel? http://bderzhavets.blogspot.com/2009/05/deployment-xen-3.html

flight 6714 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/6714/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: build-amd64-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 6658 build-amd64 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 6658 build-i386-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 6658

Hi all, I've started writing a new mboot.c32 using the Syslinux native APIs; it is currently on the new-mboot branch of the Syslinux git repository. However, I don't have a huge number of things which use Multiboot set up to test, so I'd really appreciate it if you're a user of mboot.c32 to help me try this and report back positive or negative. I don't have the Solaris DHCP

Gordon Messmer writes: > On 10/21/19 6:38 AM, isdtor wrote: > > Booting with CentOS6 /boot/efi/EFI/redhat/grub.efi, and the older style pxe config file as per ... results in a grub (legacy) prompt on the target machine. > > > Have you tried using the file from the installation tree? > > http://centos.s.uw.edu/centos/6/os/x86_64/EFI/BOOT/ > > or with files

flight 16260 xen-4.2-testing real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/16260/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-i386-i386-xl 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 16228 test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 16228 test-i386-i386-win 5