similar to: Windows 2008 Server Standard Licences

Hi, I'm looking for a way to determine the licenses of packages we're using. Is there a command (rpm, yum, up2date...) that will take the package name as argument and return me the licence? Or is everything included with Centos 4 GPL? That is the only licence I found in the repositories... I remember that RH had the habit of putting all the applicable licences on the

I haven't been able to find the answer online, and am not currently able to conduct an experiment to find the answer... I understand that in a SIP call where G729 has been negotiated as the preferred codec, a G.729 licence is not consumed until there is a need to perform transcoding, e.g. play a non-g729 sound, or do voicemail, or enter a Meetme, etc. What happens when a SIP call in progress

Hi all, Some simple questions about codecs: What codec does the Zap channel use by default? Can this default be changed, and to what? (g729 too?) What codec does meetme use? (I think this is ulaw, but asking to be sure) Can you use another codec, or does everything have to be transcoded to ulaw? Finally ... if I have a 3way call going, between 1 g729 caller and two other callers, do I need one

Hi all! I can't use the TSE licence server in Windows 2008 server. This Server is member of my Samba Domain. My TSE licence server is actived and my licences added, but when i want configure the TSE service and launch the Licence diagnostic the diagnostic failed. I think my problem is due to my Windows Server is not an Active Directory controller. What are the solutions : quit the

Are there any particular licences under which R packages must be released or is it the discretion of the author? The same question if the package is to be destined for CRAN? Kind regards, Nathan -- -------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Nathan S. Watson-Haigh OCE Post Doctoral Fellow CSIRO Livestock Industries Queensland Bioscience Precinct St Lucia, QLD 4067 Australia

Hi all, We are busy developing some software (some is web based, others not) and I am having a bit of hard time understanding (or rather, choosing) a license model to work with, We will offer some free software (PHP based scripts, and even Windows based applications) and for this I'm sure the GPL, or even LGPL (for the network side?) will work fine. But, we also need to suppose these

Dear List, I am building a R package which collects ecological data about plant species from both remote (web) databases and locally stored rda files (datasets): these "local rda files" are derived from publicly available databases for which no "official" licenses are provided; I was told by the creators of these databases that users can use such data provided that the

I Purchased 4 licences for my SCSI only machine. I do have a CDROM - with a mounted CD. The Registration binary gives me a 'Segmentation Fault'. Is this like telling me I can't register the licence? Unfortunately - I only seriously scanned the mailing list after buying the keys.... Seems like the licence insists on using an IDE drive to create some sort of unique serial number.. Has

Hi, One of the key features of Asterisk is that we can install it on many hardware platforms. We've done our best to script this installation process, so that, in case of hardware failure, we can re-install Asterisk on another platform. The question I have is how can we adapt our process so that Digium's G729 licences (or other licenced software) could be installed without asking too

Hi, please, can SOMEBODY help me to find the right characters to fit into the field \details{ ... ... License: \tab ???? \cr } of the description file for a new R-package? When building the package I always get: * checking DESCRIPTION meta-information ... WARNING Non-standard license specification: What license is it under? Last time I just used "GPL" and it worked, this time it

Hi, I'm confused about my licensing obligation with respect to the Xapian SWIG bindings. I've got a python wrapper that sits above the standard Xapian Python/SWIG bindings, and I wasn't sure if the *intent* of the Xapian team is that my python wrapper - and any code that also uses my wrapper also falls under GPLv2. It seems unclear if the FSF's position on dynamic linking in

Hi, Does the G.729 module support adding more licences??

Hi all: I've just purchase some licences of G.729 codecs, and I like to bring up * using /etc/rc.d/init.d script. Does anyone knows how to start in the "old" way? Thanks in advance, Gus -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20031016/6dd07c4b/attachment.htm

Hi all, I am pleased to announce "libxenlight", a new small and lightweight C library that refactors existing code in a coherent and easy to use API to interface to the hypervisor and xenstore to perform operations such as domain creation and destruction, suspend/restore and pci passthrough. The goals of libxenlight are: - be easy to use and to extend - provide a simple and robust API

>>>>> Charles Geyer writes: > In that case, perhaps the question could be changed to could CC0 be > added to the list of R licences. Right now the only CC licence that > is in the R licenses is CC-BY-SA-4.0. Hmm, I see Name: CC0 FSF: free_and_GPLv3_compatible (https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#CC0) OSI: NA (https://opensource.org/faq#cc-zero) URL:

Hi All, Some time ago I emailed this list and mentioned (as well as a couple of techinical queries) that I was trying to contact the PRS for information on the copyright licencing requirements of a non-profit on-line radio station, a few people expressed interest in this and asked I keep them updated. Well I just sent my third email (transcript below) informing them that I will assume a further

Dear R-devel, REvolution appear to be offering ParallelR only when bundled with their R Enterprise edition. As such it appears to be non-free and closed source. http://www.revolution-computing.com/products/parallel-r.php Since R is GPL and not LGPL, is this a breach of the GPL ? Below is the "GPL and ParallelR" thread from their R forum. mdowle > It appears that ParallelR

Hi, I want to use library of samba that license is "GPLv2" in my program that is proprietary. The source code version of samba is 3.0.6. Is it possible to modify the license to "LGPL"? Thanks.

Hoping someone can clear up a licencing question... My understanding is that R is licensed under the GPL, with some headers licensed under the LGPL (per COPYRIGHTS, so that R plugins don't have to be GPL - arguably incorrect, but besides the point). JRI states that it is licensed under the LGPL - but it links against R shared libraries (or so is my understanding - please correct me if I'm

I intend to release a project I wrote with Rails. What is the right licensing scheme for a web application (content managing system) which could grow with plugins and add-ons ? Personally, I would prefer the GPL but does that mean any add-on to the CMS (like task management) will have to be GPL ? If some people contribute to the code could it still be double-licenced so that the people who