similar to: is zpool export/import | faster than rsync or cp

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 11000 matches similar to: "is zpool export/import | faster than rsync or cp"

2009 Mar 27
18
Growing a zpool mirror breaks on Adaptec 1205sa PCI
Setup: Osol.11 build 109 Athlon64 3400+ Aopen AK-86L mobo adeptec 1250sa Sata PCI controller card [re-posted from accidental post to osol `general'' group] I''m having trouble with an adaptec 1205sa (non-raid) SATA PCI card. It was all working fine when I plugged 2 used sata 200gb disks of a windows xp machine into it. Booted my osol server and added a zpool mirror using those
2009 Feb 18
11
Confused about prerequisites for ZFS to work
I''m hoping to get some general clues about what all is required to get an experiment going with zfs. I''ve managed to install osol-11 in a vmware on windowsXP host from a recent *.iso. I''m following along with Simon''s blog showing how to set up ZFS. I''m newbie with both ZFS and Solaris but the instructions seem pretty clear. However I''m
2009 Mar 06
5
RePartition OS disk, give some to zpool
I''ve got knee deep into learning how to use Opensolaris and zfs, and I see now that my goal of home zfs server may have been better served if I had partitioned the install disk leaving some of the 60GB to be added to a zpool. First, how much space does a working OS need. I don''t mean bare minimum but to be comfortable and have some growing room (on the install disk)?
2016 Nov 08
4
one host only: ssh_dispatch_run_fatal
Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> writes: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Harry Putnam <reader at newsguy.com> wrote: > [...] >> gv harry> ssh -vv 2x >> >> OpenSSH_7.3p1-hpn14v11, OpenSSL 1.0.2j 26 Sep 2016 > > this is a third-party modified version of OpenSSH. Can you reproduce > the problem with a stock OpenSSH from the source from
2003 May 31
3
why are these files being transfered
Setup: Redhat linux 7.3 rrsync: version 2.5.6 protocol version 27 I'm trying to employ rsync in conjuction with with a cvs setup. The setup employs a bufffer where changes are made then moved to a checked out module from cvs repository and finally any cvs actions necessary are done. So far just testing this out with some copies of both directory trees. Right now the files in both are
2016 Nov 08
4
one host only: ssh_dispatch_run_fatal
all but one lan host (gv)can ssh connect to host 2x Included windows 10, several linux. 2x is a solaris host. That problem host (gv) can connect to all others but 2x. 2x can connect to all other encluding the problem host (gv) So gv ssh to 2x throws this error: ssh_dispatch_run_fatal: Connection to 192.168.1.42 port 22: incorrect signature. 192.168.1.42 is 2x. So incoming ssh from gv to 2x
2009 Sep 10
3
zfs send of a cloned zvol
Hi, I have a question, let''s say I have a zvol named vol1 which is a clone of a snapshot of another zvol (its origin property is tank/myvol at mysnap). If I send this zvol to a different zpool through a zfs send does it send the origin too that is, does an automatic promotion happen or do I end up whith a broken zvol? Best regards. Maurilio. -- This message posted from
2016 Nov 08
4
one host only: ssh_dispatch_run_fatal
Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> writes: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Harry Putnam <reader at newsguy.com> wrote: >> Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> writes: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Harry Putnam <reader at newsguy.com> wrote: >>> [...] >>>> gv harry> ssh -vv 2x >>>> >>>>
2009 Mar 29
9
About snapshots or versioned backups
This may be a bit poorly thought through but in this case I don''t really know enough to really think it through. My back ground is linux... there I used a tool called rsnapshot which used rsync and some hardlink magic to create versioned backups. But take very little space. By versioned I don''t mean as in version control but just copies of files as they change. It worked by
2016 Nov 08
2
one host only: ssh_dispatch_run_fatal
Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> writes: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Harry Putnam <reader at newsguy.com> wrote: > [...] >> After having 7.3p1 & 6.8p1 fail with same wording... I tried 6.7p1 and >> find it fails with what looks like the same problem but has slightly >> different wording. > > I set up the same versions (server:OpenSSH_6.6p1,
2009 Mar 30
3
Data corruption during resilver operation
I''m in well over my head with this report from zpool status saying: root # zpool status z3 pool: z3 state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has experienced an error resulting in data corruption. Applications may be affected. action: Restore the file in question if possible. Otherwise restore the entire pool from backup. see: http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-8A
2002 Jan 10
2
exclude this file #notes#
What is the necessary syntax to exclude a file named #notes# from an action? I've tried these without success: #* "#*" #notes# "#notes#" \#notes\#
2009 Jul 08
1
rsync between windows Opensolaris failures
Can anyone tell me what is wrong in this picture with error output: rsync -nvviirp --inplace harry@harvey:/cygdrive/c/Documents\ And\ Settings ./docs_settings_$(dtf) opening connection using ssh harvey -l harry rsync --server --sender -vvnpr --inplace . "/cygdrive/c/Documents And Settings" harry@harvey's password: protocol version mismatch -- is your shell clean? (see the rsync
2002 Apr 12
1
Once again somewhat mystified with exclude rules
I go thru this every few mnths it seems. Rsyncs exclude rules are very sophisticated but because of that somewhat unfathomable at times. Simplified: I want to exclude directories named no_bak anywhere in the tree but only the files under them, not the direcrories themselves. My exclude rules look like: no_bak/* /no_bak/* The first one does catch directories by that name on the first level but
2009 Jun 23
6
recursive snaptshot
I thought I recalled reading somewhere that in the situation where you have several zfs filesystems under one top level directory like this: rpool rpool/ROOT/osol-112 rpool/export rpool/export/home rpool/export/home/reader you could do a shapshot encompassing everything below zpool instead of having to do it at each level. (Maybe it was in a dream...)
2003 Jul 05
1
How to pull files that are behind excluded directories
Can this be done: Directory structure under ~/News News/agent/nntp/(various server names)/=> thousands of actual news messages/ But also a few files I wnat backed up. Example News/agent/nntp/some.news.server/agent.lib I want agent.lib directory but not all the other stuff under some.news.server ls News/agent/nntp/some.news.server/ agent.lib comp gnu alt The other directories
2006 Feb 22
1
Include Exclude .. a canonical way
I'm wrestling with include/exclude rules and not finding a way to do this: Simplified command: rsync -avv --exclcude-from=rsync_exclude \ ~/ /dest/ Backup ~/ including ~/.kde3.5/share/apps/konqueror/bookmarks.xml but excluding everything else under ~/.kde3.5 Here are some of what hasn't worked in an EXCLUDE file. + /.kde3.5/share/apps/konqueror/bookmarks.xml
2004 Jun 01
1
include directory and all files under
Sorry, but it seems everytime I setup a different rsync operation (client only) I end up here unraveling the include/exclude stuff I need. The documentation is quite good but I guess the subject is just quite a bit to chew. To cut to the chase: I want to sync up my own snapshot repository of openbsd. The basic install files. They reside at:
2011 Aug 11
6
unable to mount zfs file system..pl help
# uname -a Linux testbox 2.6.18-194.el5 #1 SMP Tue Mar 16 21:52:39 EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # rpm -qa|grep zfs zfs-test-0.5.2-1 zfs-modules-0.5.2-1_2.6.18_194.el5 zfs-0.5.2-1 zfs-modules-devel-0.5.2-1_2.6.18_194.el5 zfs-devel-0.5.2-1 # zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT pool1 120K 228G 21K /pool1 pool1/fs1 21K 228G 21K /vik [root at
2009 Dec 04
30
ZFS send | verify | receive
If there were a ?zfs send? datastream saved someplace, is there a way to verify the integrity of that datastream without doing a ?zfs receive? and occupying all that disk space? I am aware that ?zfs send? is not a backup solution, due to vulnerability of even a single bit error, and lack of granularity, and other reasons. However ... There is an attraction to ?zfs send? as an augmentation to the