similar to: [Bridge] BRIDGE + NFSROOT + IPTABLES (IP Conntrack) trouble

I know this must have been asked before, but I was just wondering, the manual says it can do attended transfers, has anyone gotten this to work successfully? How did they do it? Is it possible to do attended transfers with the 'T' dial option? If so, how? -Chris Chris Shaw IS Manager Water Tech Industries Phone: (888)-254-8412 Fax: (503)-261-9118 E-Mail: chriss@watertech.com

I have really tried to do my best googling and wiki-reading before asking this question. I couldn't find the answers there so I throw myself at the mercy of the list... I get excellent quality for SIP -> PSTN and PSTN -> SIP calls, however when I or anyone else calls from PSTN -> * the voice menus are oftentimes very choppy. Sometimes they are absolutely perfect and I cannot tell

Back to the ACTUAL TOPIC of this thread... This phone looks kinda nice, where can one get hold of it? How about it's * compatibility? I realize that it says it does things like 3-way conference and attended transfers, but how about in *? -Chris Chris Shaw IS Manager Water Tech Industries Phone: (888)-254-8412 Fax: (503)-261-9118 E-Mail: chriss@watertech.com

Ok.. this is really wierd... I just cleaned up my dialplan a bit by adding some macros with a strange side effect... On my incoming context which has no macros in it, far end ringing used to work... now that I have macros defined, far end ringing has stopped working all together... The macros DO work, but when they transfer, the far end ringing sounds terrible and even skips a few rings... If I

don't quote me on this but I believe the earlier assumtion is correction. I think you need to have RTP going bothways otherwise the call will disconnect. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-admin@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Chris Shaw Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 12:40 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re:

Now that most of you have worked overtime to show why most people are continually pissed at Nix Users (all except two of course). The problem I can see is the downright technosnobbery involved. There is nothing wrong with Linux. I play around with RH9 and FreeBSD and find that most things run fine. But you get into a problem where it keeps asking for the same blamed libraries over and over on

> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Shaw [mailto:chriss@watertech.com] > Sent: September 7, 2004 4:40 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Maximum tollerable lag/jitter for IAX2 > w/ojitterbuffer enabled? > {clip} > > If you can reproduce it, this smells like a bug... IAX runs over TCP and TCP >

Has anyone tried using BroadVoice for VSP? I have Asterisk configured for a home office & I've been trying to decide which VoIP provider to go with for a little while now. I had heard you could get sub $.01 calls but I have not found that to be true yet (not saying it's not possible, I just haven't found it!). Also I'm not sure if BV will support multiple lines. Any

any comments? if nothing else, is there any way to atomically setup bridge? not on list, please cc. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 21:08:15 -0000 From: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk> To: Adam Sulmicki <adam@cfar.umd.edu>, xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] nfsroot and brige > hello, > it seems like a catch-22 to

I have a bridge that has gigabit interfaces. The machine in question has the fun job of being a Bridge, Firewall and SMB server. Both of the Gigabit interfaces are connected to workstations directly via Xover cable (well MDI-X to be exact). My question is, if I enable jumbo frames on the gigabit interfaces will that make any difference in overall transfer rate of the bridge? I was thinking it

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=873 Summary: iptables -I CHAIN -m conntrack ! --ctproto 0 is intended to produce an error message, but it doesn't (usually) Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=875 Summary: iptables -m conntrack --ctstatus NONE,EXPECTED is not consistent with --ctstatus SEEN_REPLY,EXPECTED Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=873 Fabio <pedretti.fabio at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |pedretti.fabio at gmail.com Resolution|---

Hi, I''m testing out Xen on FC4. I''m using bridging for networking, as well as iptables to firewall, configured with the standard Fedora ''system-config-security-level'' tool. However I have really strange problem with conntrack not seeming to catch outbound connections. This prevents outbound connections working from dom0. Connections from domU''s

in Documentation/nfsroot.txt, it says: 1.) Enabling nfsroot capabilities ----------------------------- In order to use nfsroot you have to select support for NFS during kernel configuration. Note that NFS cannot be loaded as a module in this case. The configuration script will then ask you whether you want to use nfsroot, and if yes what kind of auto configuration system you want to use.

I made a diskless node centos. the pxelinux.cfg/default file : default centos label centos kernel vmlinuz-2.6.18-194.el5 append initrd=initrd-2.6.18-194.el5.nfs.img nfsroot=10.10.10.1:/srv/centos ip=dhcp rw I can successfull*y boot-strap the system with no error.* *But when i shutdown or reboot it . It will show in the screen :* *Unmounting NFS filesystems* *INIT:no more process

Does anyone have any good how-to's or documentation on setting up read only root NFS for pxe booting diskless computers? A few months ago I stumbled upon an official Redhat doc through a google search(not hosted by redhat and I cannot find it anywhere on the Redhat site) written by Dave Kline named "Configuring diskless clients with Red Hat Enterprise Linux" from 2011. It seemed to

I just checked in changes to kinit, such that it is now a single 29KB executable that replaces the kernel's ipconfig and nfsroot code. The kinit code isn't very elegant, but I figured it was better to save space than to fully generalise it so that it could be extended in a sort of modular fashion. If someone wants modularity, I figure they can spend the few extra KB and run the

> Hi, > > I've got a task to have a small number of laptops netboot Linux over > WiFi. The kernel is loaded off the USB stick of cource, it's off topic > for now. > > The WPA-supplicant daemon is started early by dracut off initrd. It > works. Mostly. > > The problem is that upon shutdown systemd terminates all the processes > FIRST and unmounts filesystems

Hi, I'm trying to deploy some non-linux OS via pxe and I was thinking to just launch CentOS in RAM and then run dd or qemu-img or something like this in order to complete the other OS install via template imaging. My first idea was to build a custom CentOS livecd and use that in combination with pxe kernel parameters, but perhaps there's a better way to do this. Ideas? Thanks, Lucian --