similar to: dovecot Mstone benchmark

Hello, So we've chosen to use dovecot as our imap mail server and replace our old cyrus server ! BUT : I would like to do a conversion of my imap accounts (and keep all theirs characteristics) from cyrus-imapd-2.2.12 in cyrus format to dovecot 1.1.3 in courrier format. I've tried those 3 tools : cyrus2courrier.1.5.ts cyrus2courier-1.3z4 imapsync (works well but very slow and should not

First of all : forgive me for my poor English Hello all, I've to compare cyrus with dovecot for my work. Because these are the only solutions that could fit our needs. Unfortunately I really don't know a lot about dovecot and I would like to have some of its assets. Here are the properties of the versus table I've done : dovecot cyrus Installation: Update: Migration from cyrus

Hello, We would like to do a feed back to this active mailing list. We are working on a migration project from cyrus to dovecot. And we have just completed the benchmark sequence. As I say, this benchmark is here only to show that our old imap server is out to date. I would not be the source of controversy at all, so I try to explain my approach. Because the only thing I found was this old

Hello, I''m trying to script a tool that return all the @ip for all the domU I have. Is it possible to have those informations from within the dom0 ? (maybe by connecting to the domU from the dom0 ?) Thank you _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hello all, I've set up a webmail solution based on RedHat EL 5, sendmail, spamassassin, clamAV and dovecot by following this tutorial: http://www.redhat.com/magazine/025nov06/features/email/index.html I have configured everything without any problem, I can send and receive emails, using Maildir store format. Now, what I don't know how to set up: I would like to store the emails sent by

I just changed Dovecot v1.1 code to work much more nicely when appending new messages to large mailboxes. Dovecot hg (cydir format, fsync_disable=yes): ./imaptest secs=1 ./imaptest - append=100,0 logout=0 msgs=10000000 clients=1 seed=1 secs=300 Logi Sele Appe 100% 100% 100% 1 1 2322 1/ 1 0 0 1998 1/ 1 0 0 2293 1/ 1 0 0 2009 1/ 1 0 0 1789 1/ 1 0

Bonjour, D?apr?s votre question ? Jean_Marc : ? Je m'int?resse ? la source 1.0.5, et je ne vois pas une _spx_lpc (). Il ya une _spx_autocorr (), qui est en lpc.c et est appel? ? proximit? du d?part de la Codeur fonction dans nb_celp.c. L'encodeur semble appeler la autocorr () la fonction, puis appelle wld () pour faire quelque chose qui s'appelle Levinson-Durbin.

Hello, I would like to know if it's possible to subscribe to a folder that is on a read only File System ? We have a snapshot mechanism that create a .snapshot directly in the user folder. This is done by our NAS and we would like to give an access to this backup to our users. Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: mathieu_kretchner.vcf

Hello, I've tried to write an OCF ressource agent in order to manage by the heartbeat way a dovecot server. It seems to work fine. This kind of script could be found in the directory on a CentOS release 5.2 : /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/ If the attachement isn't working, I've cut and paste the script here :

Hello all, I've configured a dovecot server in proxy mode. It seems to work well but. I've tested managesieve with squirrelmail and it's working correctly but I can't connect to cyrus sieve server : timsieved Does anybody here have configure a sieve proxy to do this ? Or is it a normal behavior and dovecot sieve proxy can't speak with cyrus sieve ? Thanks. --------------

Hello, is there any option that could disable such log : Mar 2 16:47:31 imap dovecot: imap-login: Disconnected (no auth attempts): rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, secured, port=143 Mar 2 16:48:31 imap last message repeated 2 times Mar 2 16:49:32 imap last message repeated 2 times Mar 2 16:51:02 imap last message repeated 3 times Mar 2 16:52:02 imap last message repeated 2 times Thanks.

Now that I have a working kvm setup, I thought I'd finally try how Zimbra works. This is mainly some microbenchmarking, so it may not have much to do with actual performance in real life. Setup: - 1GB memory given to kvm (from host's 2GB) - Intel Core 2 6600 (kvm uses only one CPU) - CentOS 5 - 15GB qcow2 image on XFS filesystem - Zimbra 5.0 RC2 RHEL5 x86_64 - Dovecot latest hg,

http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-dbox-redesign/ Looks like multi-dbox scales pretty nicely. Even after 100k messages the peak saved msgs/sec is the same as the initial saved msgs/sec, even if the average slows down somewhat. I tested this by first deleting mailbox, then running "imaptest" for a second to get saving to start writing several fields to dovecot.index.cache file. Then ran

I cleaned up the lib-storage code a bit so that it's easier to write support for new mailbox formats. It could still use a bit of cleaning up. Anyway, I thought I'd try how easy it would be to implement Cyrus-like mail store which would consist of only Dovecot's index files and "<uid>." message files. Flags and everything else is kept only in Dovecot's index files

On 4 Jul 2018, at 20.10, Jo?o Paulo Sacchetto Ribeiro Bastos <joaopaulosr95 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey guys, > > Has anybody ever used imaptest to benchmark *ONLY* reads? I'm trying to run a battery of tests in my new cluster and apparently no combination of parameters works, because fetch instruction doesn't run. Below is the command I'm using and its partial

I thought I'd try benchmarking with dbmail (v2.2.4) to see how much slower a SQL backend could actually be. Skip to bottom for the conclusions. Originally I ran the tests with the databases being in XFS filesystem. MySQL's performance was horrible. It went 3-7x faster with ext3. MySQL 5.0.30 backend (innodb): ./imaptest clients=1 - append=100 seed=1 secs=30 msgs=1000000 logout=0

Hey guys, Has anybody ever used imaptest to benchmark *ONLY* reads? I'm trying to run a battery of tests in my new cluster and apparently no combination of parameters works, because fetch instruction doesn't run. Below is the command I'm using and its partial output imaptest/src/imaptest host=$SERVER_IP port=143 user=teste%d at example%d.com pass=$TEST_PASS users=10 domains=10

Hi Jean-Marc I'm looking at the 1.0.5 source, and I'm not seeing an _spx_lpc(). There's an _spx_autocorr(), which is in lpc.c and is called near the start of the encoder function in nb_celp.c. The encoder seems to call the autocorr() function, then calls wld() to do something called Levinson-Durbin. Am I right in thinking that after the call to wld(), the st->lpc[] array

Hello, I'm attempting to use imaptest to test auths/sec on my imap server, to simulate the number I'm getting now on a new server. Based on my readings of dovecot stats outputs, my current machine is doing somewhere between 11.6 and 196 logins/sec at its busiest, and I want to make sure the new server can handle that amount. With imaptest I attempt to simulate this by just simulating

Some new features in CVS HEAD are: - v1.0 saves most of the data to dovecot.index.cache only when the client is FETCHing the messages. With mboxes the message headers are saved while parsing the mbox, which is almost the same thing. With CVS HEAD the dovecot.index.cache file is updated already when the new messages are being saved (with deliver or IMAP APPEND). This avoids reading the message