similar to: [Bug 874] Any conntrack conditions specified with --ctstate INVALID are not checked

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=874 --- Comment #4 from Phil Sutter <phil at nwl.cc> --- (In reply to Fabio from comment #3) > Reopening, it looks like 2e704f6ddd6d0 fixed 873, not 874. Oh, right! Thanks for spotting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=874 Summary: Any conntrack conditions specified with --ctstate INVALID are not checked Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=873 Fabio <pedretti.fabio at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |pedretti.fabio at gmail.com Resolution|---

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1214 Fabio <pedretti.fabio at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pedretti.fabio at gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Fabio <pedretti.fabio at gmail.com> --- It would be nice

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1111 Fabio <pedretti.fabio at gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |pedretti.fabio at gmail.com Resolution|---

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1740 Bug ID: 1740 Summary: hashlimit limit: reduction to lowest terms in the output is confusing Product: iptables Version: 1.8.x Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1423 Bug ID: 1423 Summary: iptables-translate silently discards --ctstate DNAT Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2888 Bug ID: 2888 Summary: Consider adding other compression schemes (lz4, zstd) Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.7p1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3194 Bug ID: 3194 Summary: Please consider lowering chacha20-poly1305 at openssh.com cipher priority on AES-NI capable CPU Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 8.3p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1745 Bug ID: 1745 Summary: recent man page Product: iptables Version: git (please indicate commit ID) Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee: netfilter-buglog at

Il giorno lun, 02/09/2019 alle 08.26 +0100, Rowland penny via samba ha scritto: > > set 01 22:36:56 s-addc.studiomosca.net named[639]: samba_dlz: > > cancelling transaction on zone studiomosca.net > > That is showing that a client isn't being allowed to update a record. Is it possible to cure it in some way? > > [2] ----[smb.conf] > > > Please do not post

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=873 Summary: iptables -I CHAIN -m conntrack ! --ctproto 0 is intended to produce an error message, but it doesn't (usually) Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108032 Bug ID: 108032 Summary: nv50_ir_lowering_gm107.cpp:326: undefined reference to `nv50_ir::NVC0LoweringPass::loadMsAdjInfo32(nv50_ir::T exInstruction::Target, unsigned int, int, nv50_ir::Value*, bool)' Product: Mesa Version: git

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1481 Bug ID: 1481 Summary: [ebtables-nft] ebtables -E gives error Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables Assignee:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60369 Priority: medium Bug ID: 60369 CC: airlied at freedesktop.org Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: src/nouveau_exa.c:142:31: error: 'CREATE_PIXMAP_USAGE_SHARED' undeclared (first use in this function) QA Contact:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91 mschwendt@users.sf.net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Additional Comments From mschwendt@users.sf.net

I have do a classicupdate from a NT4 style domain to Samba DC 4.10.7 BIND_DLZ without (apparently) problem All seem work fine, access to PC work, join or re-join a PC to domain work, access from a Linux samba member server to Win7 PC work, access from Win7 to samba member server work. But I cannot access from a PC with win7 to another PC with win7. If I try to access from win7-0 to win7-1 via

Hi all, I''ve a routing problem. I''m setting up a router based on debian (kernel 2.4). I need to setup routing to export an ftp service (ftp server is in dmz) to 2 wan (both). I setup prerouting ad forward rule with no problem. The problem is that reply packet use default gateway (default wan) even though they are enter using the other wan. I solved it marking packets in input

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1447 Bug ID: 1447 Summary: Conntrack marks ICMPv6 multicast and anycast ping responces as invalid. Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=495 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com Summary|Netfilter Connection |conntrack race condition