similar to: Why does dtrace -h remove const qualifier?

I have been using iosoop script (see http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/dtrace/scripts/) written by Brendan Gregg to look at the IO operations of my application. When I was running my test-program on a UFS filesystem I could see both read and write operations like: UID PID D BLOCK SIZE COMM PATHNAME 203803 4436 R 6016592 16384 diskio <none> 203803 4436 W 3448432

I have inserted some probes in my application, and it works great in the "debug build" I have been using. So I wanted to look at the "overhead" introduced by inactive dtrace probes in my application. I am using the Sun Studio 11 compiler, so I added the following options: -xO5 -g0 -xbuiltin But this breaks the linking of my application. Undefined first

I''d like to prepend TRACE_ to the macro names generated by dtrace -h. For example, change POSTGRESQL_LWLOCK_ACQUIRE(arg0, arg1) to TRACE_POSTGRESQL_LWLOCK_ACQUIRE(arg0, arg1) and still keep postgresql as the provider name. The reason for doing this is to make it clear that the macros are used for (D)tracing. In this particular case, without TRACE_, it appears like the macro is used

Hi, Chris (cc) and I try to get the SGE master monitor work with Apple Leopard dtrace. Unfortunately we are stuck with the error msg below. Anyone having an idea what could be the cause? What I can rule out as cause is function inlining for the reasons explained below. Background information on SGE master monitor implementation is under http://wiki.gridengine.info/wiki/index.php/Dtrace

Just to let people know what my big picture is, I''m trying to write a script that will let me run a program, and name a progeny of that program that I want to debug. My script should find the first occurrence of that progeny, and run it until it finishes initializing the runtime linker, but stop it before it runs any shared library startup routines. (Failing that, I''d be okay

Hey, Im able to reproduce a crash from plockstat everytime Im tracing a JVM pid. I do recall a problem related with this one, but not clear if this has been fixed in U3 or is it planned for U4 ? Any BugID opened for this stack trace: > ::stack libc.so.1`strlen+0x50(100003faa, ffffffff7ffff5c8, ffffffff7eca1114, ffffffff7fffec79, 0, 100003fa9) libc.so.1`snprintf+0x88(ffffffff7ffff8f0, 0,

Does dtrace have a problem catching the return from memset on Mac OSX? The script below catches the entry just fine but the return clause is never entered. Thanks, Joel --- pid$target::memset:entry /arg1 == 0/ { self->size = arg2; self->ts = timestamp; self->vts = vtimestamp; } pid$target::memset:return /self->size/ { @ts = sum(timestamp - self->ts); @vts =

I have found that pid provider can not create memcpy:return probe for 64bit process on snv_110. For example, the pid is 10603, I will have following output for dtrace command: #dtrace -n pid10603:libc.so.1:memcpy:return dtrace: invalid probe specifier pid10603:libc.so.1:memcpy:return: probe description pid10603:libc.so.1:memcpy:return does not match any probes This just

Dear dtrace Experts, I have seen some dtrace utilities like opensnoop and execsnoop etc. My interest is to write a simple script that can snoop the files which uses the 3 syscalls like open,create,unlink. I have gone through dtrace oneliners that can do the same : dtrace -n ''syscall::open*:entry { printf("%s %s",execname,copyinstr(arg0));}'' dtrace -n

Hi, I''m posting a question hoping someone will know the answer off hand thereby reducing my search time. :-) With USDT probes, the tracepoint is only installed by libdtrace itself, never by the drti ioctl. So whenever I run a program with an USDT probe, no tracepoint is installed. Only after I run the dtrace command the tracepoint is actually installed on the victim process. My question

I''d like to see if we can use DTrace to as the kernel implementation of the BSD systrace security policy system (http://www.systrace.org). I don''t really want to port systrace to Solaris because I think with DTrace we already have all the necessary in kernel hooks to do this. With systrace you express things like: "httpd can bind to port 80 but not any other port, it

After building and bfu''in the lastest ON build, any time I run a dtrace script I get a Seg Fault. Is there a dtrace for dtrace :) Doug root at prae> dtrace -n ''syscall::open*:entry { printf("%s %s",execname,copyinstr(arg0)); }'' Segmentation Fault (core dumped) root at prae> pstack core core ''core'' of 101364: dtrace -n

Dear list Some time ago I told about the translation of the LGPL'ed R headerfiles to Delphi. I am happy that most of them are translated now and the code, demo and description is online (licensed under GPLv2): http://treetron.googlepages.com I just annonced a native Excel reader/writer in R-help which is based on this headerfile translation. Probably most of you won't care (using Linux)

Author: bmc Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 213bfe03af413cdf71c523fb076aaa65a6306a7e Log message: 6256581 System got a hang or a panic with dtrace+kmdb 6264573 unanchored dtrace_getpcstack is rather imprecise toward function end 6289517 dtrace doesn''t like fd_intr anymore 6291378 dtrace helpers can interfere with the use of kmdb 6295554 dtrace doesn''t report

What''s going on? # dtrace -s iotime_all.d 100 dtrace: failed to enable ''iotime_all.d'': DIF program content is invalid The errant script.... #pragma D option quiet BEGIN { stime = timestamp; io_count = 0; } io:::start /args[2]->fi_pathname != "<none>"/ { start[pid, args[2]->fi_pathname, args[0]->b_edev, args[0]->b_blkno,

N_conreq:entry { self->x=1; calledaddr=(struct xaddrf *)arg3; callingaddr=(struct xaddrf *)arg4; trace(calledaddr->link_id); tracemem(calledaddr->DTE_MAC.lsap_add, 80); trace(callingaddr->link_id); tracemem(callingaddr->DTE_MAC.lsap_add, 80); } 0 -> N_conreq 255

Hello, 9-STABLE fails to build with clang and *without* "NO_WERROR=" and "WERROR=" in /etc/make.conf. It used to work not long before : FreeBSD zozo.afpicl.lan 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0 r237222M: Mon Jun 18 10:18:54 CEST 2012 root@zozo.afpicl.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CORE amd64 # svnversion 238067M # make NOCLEAN=yes NO_CLEAN=yes buildworld [...] ===> cddl/lib

Hi all, What is the correct way to give one non-root user the ability to use DTrace with providers running in a process by another user? Through the Web Stack project and some work by Ludovic Champenois and Nasser Nouri, we have done a bit of work to bring together parts of chime, the Web Stack Apache, Ruby and PHP providers, and stuff reused from the DTrace toolkit. It''s in

[Perhaps someone could rename this list to dtrace-matt-problems-discuss?] If I run this script against my binary (which contains a USDT probe called ''concurrentq-latency''): ::: / probename == "concurrentq-latency" / { printf("[%s]:[%s]:[%s]\n", probeprov, probefunc, probename); } I get this output: dtrace: script ''testq.d'' matched 46056

Author: ahl Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: b1ab97f77b0ad2a4fe2a43d9c5aac7259840bb90 Log message: 6370454 dtrace should support USDT probes in static functions Files: update: usr/src/lib/libdtrace/common/dt_dof.c update: usr/src/lib/libdtrace/common/dt_link.c update: usr/src/lib/libdtrace/common/dt_provider.c update: usr/src/lib/libdtrace/common/dt_provider.h