Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1200 matches similar to: "btrfs questions.."
2007 Sep 18
1
zfs-discuss Digest, Vol 23, Issue 34
Hello,
I am a final year computer engg student and I am planning to implement
zfs on linux,
I have gone through the articles posted on solaris . Please let me
know about the
feasibility of zfs to be implemented on linux.
waiting for valuable replies.
thanks in advance.
On 9/14/07, zfs-discuss-request at opensolaris.org
<zfs-discuss-request at opensolaris.org> wrote:
> Send
2009 Oct 10
3
Theora patent question
Does the reason Theora is relatively safe from patent infringement
lawsuit have more to do with it actually not being encumbered, or is
it because its use is decentralized?
For example, FreeType is not patent-free, nor is Linux, yet they
succeed because on the one hand, they are open source, and those who
maintain them do not guarantee anything regarding patents, it is up to
each individual user
2005 Oct 04
12
Sprint Nextel sueing over VoIP patents
Sprint Nextel is sueing vonage, voiceglo and theglobe.com for infringing
on VoIP patents. Sprint Nextel claims to have about 100 patents on VoIP
technologies. Does anyone know which ones this article is talking
about, and if so does asterisk have any of those features?
The reason I am asking is that the article is vague, Vonage uses a
fairly standard codec set, I dont know about the others.
2015 Oct 21
5
RFC: Improving license & patent issues in the LLVM community
Hi David,
Sorry for the delay getting back to you, been a bit buried:
On Oct 19, 2015, at 10:12 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>> The TL;DR version of this is that I think we should discuss relicensing all of LLVM under the Apache 2.0 license and add a runtime exception clause. See below for a lot more details.
>
> I agree that this is a problem.
2011 Nov 21
1
A-law and mu-law
Thank you all for your answers. They were all useful.
Il 21/11/2011 07:37, Erik de Castro Lopo ha scritto:
> Giulio Paci wrote:
>
>> thank you for your answer. So the problem would be suboptimal
>> compression due to suboptimal assumption about the input signal, right?
>> What I do not understand is how the format of a FLAC format would be
>> affected by supporting
2014 May 30
1
attachment sis + EMLINK (too many links) = segfault bug (2.2.12)
Hi,
we use attachment dedup with lots of emails (still migrating to it
from maildir).
We use netapp storage with wafl filesystem over nfs.
Problem is that netapp has hard limit of 100k hardlinks to one file.
And we encountered it.
Problem is that dovecot start do segfault (lmtp,dsync,pop3 etc) when it
happend when tried to deliver new emails with that attachment.
Here is strace of dsync:
6740
2016 Nov 03
2
RFC #2: Improving license & patent issues in the LLVM community
>
>
>
> I’m still not completely convinced by this argument, given that the
> majority of patent lawsuits come from NPEs.
That is not necessarily where the majority of patent lawsuit *danger* comes
from, and i'd argue, pretty strongly, it's not the most likely case for
LLVM.
> We’d still be in the situation where a malicious contributor could:
>
> 1. Spin up a
2018 Mar 23
2
File system permissions - setgid bit and Netapp NFS volumes
Greetings Dovecot List,
I have a bit of an edge case I am trying to resolve. I am currently
using dovecot on Ubuntu 14.04 - Ubuntu package version:
1:2.2.9-1ubuntu2.3
I have attached the output of doveconf -n to this email - but to
describe the configuration in a nutshell:
my server is configured to use Maildir storage
I do not use dovecot delivery service (there is a separate
2009 Apr 26
9
Peculiarities of COW over COW?
We run our IMAP spool on ZFS that''s derived from LUNs on a Netapp
filer. There''s a great deal of churn in e-mail folders, with messages
appearing and being deleted frequently. I know that ZFS uses copy-on-
write, so that blocks in use are never overwritten, and that deleted
blocks are added to a free list. This behavior would spread the free
list all over the zpool. As well,
2018 Dec 26
3
You removed Weboob package over political reasons? Whole Internet laughs at you
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 01:26:15PM -0500, rj coleman wrote:
>
>
> > On Dec 24, 2018, at 10:42 AM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/24/18 7:21 AM, vsnsdualce at memeware.net wrote:
> >> Debian is not ruled by the men who actually write the software, but instead women.
> >
> > *snip*
> >
> > Can we
2016 Nov 02
3
RFC #2: Improving license & patent issues in the LLVM community
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 12:21 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 09:16:47AM -0700, Chris Lattner via llvm-dev wrote:
>> The goals of this effort are outlined in the previous email but, in short, we aim to:
>> - encourage ongoing contributions to LLVM by preserving low barrier to entry for contributors.
2006 Mar 23
1
YAML inconsistencies...
I figured I''d post here before submitting a ticket, but I''m seeing some
confusing stuff when dealing with YAML now. I was using it to freeze
objects in my database, and so i had some data already around to mess with.
I upgraded both Ruby (1.8.3 -> 1.8.4) and Rails ( -> 1.1RC1) and this junk
started. I''ve outlined the problem in two pastes, which I''ll
2007 May 30
1
rsync-ing IMAP mbox-format mailboxes to NetApp
Hi all,
Sorry for the longish post!
I've been looking at using rsync to mirror our mailstore (BSD/mbox
format, i.e. flat files consisting of concatenated plaintext messages)
to a NetApp Nearstore (basically a filer with SATA rather than FC disk)
mounted over NFS.
I want to do this in such a way that the NetApp automatic snapshots are
kept as small as possible, so hopefully several versions
2005 Nov 09
2
Filers, filesystems, etc.
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:04:54AM -0800, Bryan J. Smith wrote:
>
> > NAS offers safe concurent access (generally, there might be
> > some NAS devices outthere that do not). NAS device will
> > manage file system internally, and export it over NFS or
> > SMB protocols to the clients.
>
> Such NAS' are a combined host+storage aka
2008 Jun 13
1
Speex
Dear Speex developer(s),
We are currently in the process of evaluating speech codecs for the
transmission of wideband speech (fs=16kHz) at bitrates lower than 32
kb/s. Speex is a contender for this task.
Practically we would have to port Speex to a specific 16 bit DSP if we
would go for this. We should be able to handle this.
But we would like to ask for your opinion regarding patent
2010 Apr 27
7
Mapping inode numbers to file names
Let''s suppose you rename a file or directory.
/tank/widgets/a/rel2049_773.13-4/somefile.txt
Becomes
/tank/widgets/b/foogoo_release_1.9/README
Let''s suppose you are now working on widget B, and you want to look at the
past zfs snapshot of README, but you don''t remember where it came from.
That is, you don''t know the previous name or location where that
2004 Jan 06
7
911 and lawsuits
Just curious if any of the Asterisk installers are doing anything special
to protect themselves from a possible lawsuit caused by 911 failure
during a Asterisk/computer crash?
I realize that any traditional PBX or even a phone line can fail but,
anything running on a computer is probably going to be less reliable
than most PBXs.
Anybody requiring customers to acknowledge and sign any kind of
2017 Aug 10
2
Relicensing: Revised Developer Policy
Hi Rafael,
We’ve discussed why a license change is preferable over the span of several years now. I’m happy to explain over the phone, contact me off list and we can talk.
-Chris
> On Aug 10, 2017, at 8:33 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I still don't see any justification in the text why a license change is
>
2015 Jul 19
1
was, Backups solution from WinDoze to linux, is, looking at bareos [SOLVED]
On 07/16/2015 04:25 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>> I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been
>> looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd
>> like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found
>> yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back
2017 Aug 10
2
Relicensing: Revised Developer Policy
This has already been discussed extensively in the public. The threads are available in the archives.
-Chris
> On Aug 10, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry, but I really don't think a private conversation is appropriate
> for such discussions.
>
> If the motive cannot be explained in public I have no choice