similar to: Question regarding ZFS

We have a Sun v890, and I''m interested converting existing ZFS zpool from c#t#d# to MPxIO. % zpool status pool: data state: ONLINE status: ONLINE scrub: scrub completed with 0 errors on Sun Jul 15 10:58:33 2007 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM data ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0

El 10/01/2015 a las 04:03 p.m., John R Pierce escribi?: > On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote: >> We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have >> all IPv6s available for usage. > > Do you realize that a ipv6 /48 is a septillion IP addresses? thats > 1,208,925,819,614,629,200,000,000 individual IPs ? > > Or, its 65536 /64 subnets of

Hi. I have a simple (I think) question My dataset have these variables: names(data) [1] "v1" "v2" "v3" "v4" "v5" "v6" "v7" "v8" "v9" "v10" "v11" "v12" "v13" "v14" "v15" "v16" "v17"

El 10/01/2015 a las 03:40 p.m., Gordon Messmer escribi?: > On 01/10/2015 10:10 AM, F. Mendez wrote: >> >> But of course I am assuming that like in IPv4 IPADDR_START/END is >> implemented. > > I don't think so. The START and END bits of ifup-aliases appear to be > v4 specific. > >> Please give some guidance as I need this to done already and the hole

I appreciate all the help I received from this Mailing List. However I am receiving work email to my cell phone now and I am being overwhelmed with the mailing list emails. Can some one let me know how to unsubscribe from this mailing list. Thank you -- Jose Mendez Computer Resource Specialist HNRC 619-543-8090

This question is concerning ZFS. We have a Sun Fire V890 attached to a EMC disk array. Here''s are plan to incorporate ZFS: On our EMC storage array we will create 3 LUNS. Now how would ZFS be used for the best performance? What I''m trying to ask is if you have 3 LUNS and you want to create a ZFS storage pool, would it be better to have a storage pool per LUN or combine the 3

El 10/01/2015 a las 11:41 p.m., John R Pierce escribi?: > On 1/10/2015 8:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote: >> El 10/01/2015 a las 04:03 p.m., John R Pierce escribi?: >>> On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote: >>>> We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have >>>> all IPv6s available for usage. >>> >>> Do you realize that a

Sun has changed the organization of their web site a lot over the years, and I just noticed that a URL included in the HOWTO is broken now. Perhaps there are others as well. In section 39.6.2 "Winbind on Solaris 9" (p. 503), Solaris 9 users are directed to download a patch from the following URL: http://sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/findPatch.pl?patchId=112960;rev=14 But the Sun

I am totally new to using CentOS. Linux in Genera really. I have decent experiencing with terminal code for Macs though. Here's the deal my Boss wants us to move more toward linux for some of our basic users. All I was supposed to do was install CentOS 5.2 and Open Office and disburse the machines. Simple enough right. So I did this with no issue. I ran the interface and installed only

Hello, I recently installed SunOS 5.11 snv_91 onto a Ultra 60 UPA/PCI with OpenBoot 3.31 and two 300GB SCSI disks. The root file system is UFS on c0t0d0s0. Following the steps in ZFS Admin I have attempted to convert root to ZFS utilizing c0t1d0s0. However, upon "init 6" I am always presented with: Bad magic number in disk label can''t open disk label package My Steps: 1)

On 1/10/2015 8:38 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 01/10/2015 08:10 PM, F. Mendez wrote: >> Hello. Yes I confirm...its a /48 (this guys are crazy here at my >> work...). > > It's not crazy, that's the standard deployment for a building. It's > almost certainly not possible to use all of the addresses in such a > space, but that's the point. IPv6 is

Hi All, ZPOOL / ZFS commands writes EFI label on a device if we create ZPOOL/ZFS fs on it. Is it true ? I formatted a device with VTOC lable and I created a ZFS file system on it. Now which label the ZFS device has ? is it old VTOC or EFI ? After creating the ZFS file system on a VTOC labeled disk, I am seeing the following warning messages. Feb 3 07:47:00 scoobyb

I assume that a zvol has a vtoc. What tags are supported? Thanks, Brian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20070427/57e1a64f/attachment.html>

zfs receive should allow option to disable immediately mount of received filesystem. In case of original filesystem have changed mountpoints, it''s hard to make clone fs with send-receive, because received filesystem immediately try to mount to old mountpoint, that locked by sourcr fs. In case of different host mountpoint can be locked by unrelated filesystem. Can anybody recommend a

I spend yesterday all day evading my data of one of the Windows disks, so that I can add it to the pool. Using mount-ntfs, it''s a pain due to its slowness. But once I finished, I thought "Cool, let''s do it". So I added the disk using the zero slice notation (c0d0s0), as suggested for performance reasons. I checked the pool status and noticed however that the pool size

hi all, i''ve been using a SAN LUN as the sole member of a zpool with one additional zfs filesystem. this is a flat SAN fabric, so this LUN was available to other systems on the fabric, and one of them came up with "wrong magic number" for several drives, and, as best i can tell, the vtoc for my zpool LUN was over-written on that host via format labeling to correct the error.

Greetings all- I have a new X4200 that I''m getting ready to deploy. It has four 146 GB SAS drives. I''d like to setup the box for maximum redundancy on the data stored on these drives. Unfortunately, it looks like ZFS boot/root aren''t really options at this time. The LSI Logic controller in this box only supports either a RAID0 array with all four disks, or a RAID 1

*************************************************************************************************** CISTI'2013 DOCTORAL SYMPOSIUM 8th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies Lisbn, Portugal, June 19 - 23, 2013 http://www.aisti.eu/cisti2013/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=64&Itemid=68&lang=en

*************************************************************************************************** CISTI'2013 DOCTORAL SYMPOSIUM 8th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies Lisbn, Portugal, June 19 - 23, 2013 http://www.aisti.eu/cisti2013/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=64&Itemid=68&lang=en

This question is concerning ZFS. We have a Sun Fire V890 attached to a EMC disk array. Here''s are plan to incorporate ZFS: On our EMC storage array we will create 3 LUNS. Now how would ZFS be used for the best performance? What I''m trying to ask is if you have 3 LUNS and you want to create a ZFS storage pool, would it be better to have a storage pool per LUN or combine the 3