similar to: Disabling zfs xattr in S10u4

Hi Guys, I''m playing with Blade 6300 to check performance of compressed ZFS with Oracle database. After some really simple tests I noticed that default (well, not really default, some patches applied, but definitely noone bother to tweak disk subsystem or something else) installation of S10U3 is actually faster than S10U4, and a lot faster. Actually it''s even faster on

There was a log of talk about ZFS and NFS shares being a problem when there was a large number of filesystems. There was a fix that in part included an in kernel sharetab (I think :) Does anyone know if this has made it into S10u4? Thanks, BlueUmp This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi All, Two and three-node clusters with SC3.2 and S10u3 (120011-14). If a node is rebooted when using SCSI3-PGR the node is not able to take the zpool by HAStoragePlus due to reservation conflict. SCSI2-PGRE is okay. Using the same SAN-LUN:s in a metaset (SVM) and HAStoragePlus works okay with PGR and PGRE. (both SMI and EFI-labled disks) If using scshutdown and restart all nodes then it will

System config:- bash-3.2# ifconfig -a lo0: flags=2001000849<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4,VIRTUAL> mtu 8232 index 1 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 rge0: flags=201004843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,DHCP,IPv4,CoS> mtu 1500 index 2 inet 192.168.1.53 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 0:1e:8c:25:cc:a5 lo0:

Greetings, In looking for inexpensive JBOD and/or RAID solutions to use with ZFS, I''ve run across the recent "VTrak" SAS/SATA systems from Promise Technologies, specifically their E-class and J-class series: E310f FC-connected RAID: http://www.promise.com/product/product_detail_eng.asp?product_id=175 E310s SAS-connected RAID:

I have a requirement in my current project to support multiple co-located zones on the same VLAN. Our current deployment OS is Solaris 10 Update 4. I''d like to use exclusive IP zones, but I gather the only way to currently have multiple exclusive zones with interfaces on the same VLAN is through the use of VNICs. From my initial look at S10u4, it seems VNIC support been not yet been

Greetings, Last April, in this discussion... http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=143517 ...we never found out how (or if) the Sun 6120 (T4) array can be configured to ignore cache flush (sync-cache) requests from hosts. We''re about to reconfigure a 6120 here for use with ZFS (S10U4), and the evil tuneable zfs_nocacheflush is not going to serve us well (there is a ZFS

I had some trouble installing a zone on ZFS with S10u4 (bug in the postgres packages) that went away when I used a ZVOL-backed UFS filesystem for the zonepath. I thought I''d push on with the experiment (in the hope Live Upgrade would be able to upgrade such a zone). It''s a bit unwieldy, but everything worked reasonably well - performance isn''t much worse than straight

Is there any update/work-around/patch/etc as of the S10u4 WOS for the bugs that existed with respect to LU, Zones, and ZFS? More specifically, the following: 6359924 live upgrade needs to include support for zfs I can''t even find that bug ID on bugs.opensolaris.org (or via sunsolve when I''m logged in for that matter) anymore. Basically, one couldn''t put zoneroot on

I sent this to Brendan but never got a response. Maybe someone else can help? ----- Hi Brendan. I''m trying to debug a problem where I need to snoop the network traffic over a punchin connection, where snoop doesn''t work. I found your tcpsnoop dtrace tool, which seemed like it might be able to do what I need. Unfortunately, it doesn''t seem to have an option to dump

A customer has a zpool where their spectral analysis applications create a ton (millions?) of very small files that are typically 1858 bytes in length. They''re using ZFS because UFS consistently runs out of inodes. I''m assuming that ZFS aggregates these little files into recordsize (128K?) blobs for writes. This seems to go reasonably well amazingly enough. Reads are a

Hello, I surely did a mistake by configuring our zones with zfs-root: Patches are no longer possible (without disabling the zones in /etc/zones/index) in S10u3! My questions are: 1. Has S10u4 support for zone-root in zfs? 2. Will it be possible to patch my _existing_ zfs-rooted zones when such zones will be supported? 3. Sun itself seems to recommend zfs for zone-root for easy cloning of

One of our Solaris 10 update 3 servers paniced today with the following error: Sep 18 00:34:53 m2000ef savecore: [ID 570001 auth.error] reboot after panic: assertion failed: ss != NULL, file: ../../common/fs/zfs/space_map.c, line: 125 The server saved a core file, and the resulting backtrace is listed below: $ mdb unix.0 vmcore.0 > $c vpanic() 0xfffffffffb9b49f3() space_map_remove+0x239()

Good day. We've got a question, as there's a need to mount NFS over RDMA. How we should define a pool on an already mounted NFS folder? The pool must be "shared" for all KVM nodes for live migration purposes. Thanks in advance.

I am curious why zpool status reports a pool to be in the DEGRADED state after a drive in a raidz2 vdev has been successfully replaced. In this particular case drive c0t6d0 was failing so I ran, zpool offline home/c0t6d0 zpool replace home c0t6d0 c8t1d0 and after the resilvering finished the pool reports a degraded state. Hopefully this is incorrect. At this point is the vdev in question now has

We''re planning to build a ZFS-based Solaris NFS fileserver environment with the backend storage being iSCSI-based, in part because of the possibilities for failover. In exploring things in our test environment, I have noticed that ''zpool import'' takes a fairly long time; about 35 to 45 seconds per pool. A pool import time this slow obviously has implications for how fast

Hi, I am using Flash Dashboard and 3 sets of listbox. When i change my first list box say name i need to dynamically change the second list box and from the second list box when i choose an name i need to change the content according to this in the third list box. How can i pass this datas from database in rails. thanx g.balaji -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hi All, i dont what changes i made recently but i am unable to hold the call for more 10 secs between MSN and GS. PSTN to MSN and PSTN to GS and vice versa works fine. i am not behind NAT.Also MSN to MSN works fine too. my SIP details [general] port = 5060 bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 context = bogon-calls ;context = default disallow=all allow=ulaw allow=alaw allow=ilbc allow=gsm ;My SIP phone - GS

Dear All, I need CentOS 4.4 and RHEL4 Update 3 Step-by-Step Text Mode Installation Screen Shots. Please send me the following Installation Screen Shots Details or link Regards -S.Balaji

HI, T5220, S10U4 + patches mdb -k > ::memstat While above is working (takes some time, ideally ::memstat -n 4 to use 4 threads could be useful) mpstat 1 shows: CPU minf mjf xcal intr ithr csw icsw migr smtx srw syscl usr sys wt idl 48 0 0 1922112 9 0 0 8 0 0 0 15254 6 94 0 0 So about 2mln xcalls per second. Let''s check with dtrace: