similar to: Squid 2.6 RPM

I wanted to update to CentOS 4.3 from CentOS 4.2. While updating packages using yum, there was serveral error messages, and I've found that some packages has not been updated. So I tried to update again but the packages would not be updated. I attached the messages shown below. Sungsoo Kim ------------------------------------------- [root at phobos ~]# yum update Setting up Update Process

https://build-automation.108.redhat.com/ Just a thought that it might get some more press. Trevor

I was reading through the doc''s last night and made a bunch of notes. One of the things that I wanted to learn more about was this statement: As Puppet matures, it expected that the file element will be used less and less to manage content, and instead native elements will be used to do so. Can someone please explain what this means, what the plan is, and what type of concept you are

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2006:0052 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0052.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: squid-2.5.STABLE6-3.4E.12.x86_64.rpm src: squid-2.5.STABLE6-3.4E.12.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2006:0052 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0052.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: squid-2.5.STABLE6-3.4E.12.x86_64.rpm src: squid-2.5.STABLE6-3.4E.12.src.rpm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

I have a 5.1 system with Xen installed. The package says 3.0.3, but an 'xm info' shows 3.1. So what is it? Is it 3.0.3 patched to 3.1 or is it 3.1 packaged as 3.0.3? And if it's the former, does anybody have any idea why upstream wouldn't just deploy 3.1 (now 3.1.2) which is more stable? -Ross ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail,

Hello everyone, Is it possible to run in at the same time Xen and Vmware, under the same physical host? Best regards, Bruno Sousa No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.8/1066 - Release Date: 12-10-2007 11:10 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Anyone successfully get Snare for 64-bit CentOS 5 installed and working? Thanks. Scott

By chance, has there been any progress on a 5.0 version for an Ultra Sparc? -- Best regards, Chris Registerd Linux user number 448639

If you are using Bind as your caching name server, please take note. http://www.net-security.org/secworld.php?id=5366 I use DJB's dnscache so I could care less.

I'd like to know whether a LiveCD for CentOS 5 is planned. Mike -- p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN. This message made from 100% recycled bits. You have found the bank of Larn. I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you. I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in

When I try to read a .wmv file, I get the error message: "Totem could not play 'file://tmp/F15.wmv'. You do not have a decoder installed to handle this file. You might need to install the necessary plugins.' Granted that I am missing something, what is it, and where do I get it / install it? Thanks in advance -- Bob T.

Did CentOS get an alpha yet How does this one look? http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=160115818814 will it do the job or not? - rh -- Abba Communications Spokane, WA www.abbacomm.net

I could swear that this was working just last week, but now when I run the Adobe Acrobat reader, it hangs. If I run it "directly" (/usr/bin/acroread) with -DEBUG as the first argument, I get an infinite loop of: expr: syntax error I tried removing and reinstalling it, but no change. Any ideas? -- Mark Hull-Richter DATAllegro (www.datallegro.com) 85 Enterprise, Second Floor, Aliso

When try to install CentOS 5 via ftp on an system with less then 256MB RAM it fails. After select the ftp server witch contains the data, some files are loaded, then the dialog witch prompt for the ftp sever is shown again. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5766 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic

Hi, I am surprised how some features are missing from CentOS 5. So far, I found missing: 1) GNOME Session does not prompt for saving on log out. 2) There isn't a "Run" option in the GNOME menus for running programs.

Hi, From the release notes i can read : "Note that the minimum RAM required to install Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4.92 has been raised to 1GB; the recommended RAM is 2GB. If a machine has less than 1GB RAM, the installation process may hang." Is it a joke/mistake ? :-O 1GB !!! I tested installation process with 256M / Celeron 600, seems to work ...) -- Martin

Looks like RedHat released 5.0 on schedule. Does anyone have an idea when CentOS 5.0 will be ready? I would also like to thank the CentOs team for what they are doing...... Thank you!!!!!!! Greg Ennis

If I execute these via command line, will they persist after a reboot? Or, should I be putting these into a file like /etc/sysctl.conf? --------------snip-------------- /sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog=2048 /sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout=30 /sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_intvl=10 /sbin/sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_probes=7 /sbin/sysctl -w

I'm having an odd behavior with vsftp on all CentOS 4 servers... maybe 3 too, but I'm not on those much. I am transferring in port mode as I've never managed to get passive to work with a firewall running. Anyway, this is what happens. During normal transfers with few files.. it works perfectly. During the transfer of like a large website with hundreds of files in various