similar to: ZFS and Linux

I encountered an issue that people using OS-X systems as NFS clients need to be aware of. While not strictly a ZFS issue, it may be encounted most often by ZFS users since ZFS makes it easy to support and export per-user filesystems. The problem I encountered was when using ZFS to create exported per-user filesystems and the OS-X automounter to perform the necessary mount magic. OS-X

how do i know what the root partition is? i gave the option: root="/dev/hda" in the config file. Thanks & Regards, Siddharth Wagh ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target... -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is my first post here, and i hope it is ok that i posted in this thread. I have been doing a bit of reading on the solaris platforms, and seem to be inclined to try out the open solaris os or solaris 10. My only worry is that my lack of knowledge with the command line may make this difficult regarding trouble shooting. It seems fairly straighforward creating zpools etc, but maybe nexenta is

[previously sent to rhelv5 list, apologies to those on both] I've got a problem I can reproduce easily enough, but really I fail to understand what's going wrong. I've got a 5.3 Dom0, which is running three guests. One is Fedora 10, that runs with local flat files, and works fine. One is Nexenta 2 (opensolaris-based), and that runs off of physical partitions, and seems to work

Hi, Folks, I recently migrated from courier-imapd to dovecot when I migrated a machine from rh9 to fc5. I managed to hit a snag with the 1.0b8 version of dovecot that's currently in fc5. With AppleMail 1.3 I was seeing most of my incoming mail go missing. To make a long story short, AppleMail was applying mail filters inappropriately (walking right past a 'stop processing'

This is a Redhat 9 box doing nightly updates from FedoraLegacy.org. I have a script of the whole session if needed. -Bill ---- ok transfer data run test banner.sh ... test banner: missing banner file cmp: EOF on /home/flowerpt/src/openssh/openssh/regress/empty.in missing banner file test banner: size 0 cmp: EOF on /home/flowerpt/src/openssh/openssh/regress/banner.in banner size 0 mismatch test

Hi all, Anybody could me tell when CentoOS7 will have Xen support? Thank a lot

Hi Everyone ; I will soon be making a presentation comparing ZFS against Veritas Storage Foundation , do we have any document comparing features ? regards <http://www.sun.com/> http://www.sun.com/emrkt/sigs/6g_top.gif Mertol Ozyoney Storage Practice - Sales Manager Sun Microsystems, TR Istanbul TR Phone +902123352200 Mobile +905339310752 Fax +902123352222 Email

Hi All ; One of our customer is suffered from FS being corrupted after an unattanded shutdonw due to power problem. They want to switch to ZFS. >From what I read on, ZFS will most probably not be corrupted from the same event. But I am not sure how will Oracle be affected from a sudden power outage when placed over ZFS ? Any comments ? PS: I am aware of UPS''s and

Hi all, I thought I?d post this in case any one has issues similar to mine. First, my initial email to the list which I didn?t send; I?m trying to run a KVM based guest OS off of a mirrored ZFS dataset. It won?t run with errors "invalid argument..", but will run when on the root volume, or when that ZFS dataset has been removed in favor of an EXT4 volumes. Thanks in advance, PS I

Hi Ged; At the moment ZFS is not a shared file system nor a paralell file system. However lustre integration which will take some time will provide parallel file system abilities. I am unsure if lustre at the moment supports redundancy between storage nodes (it was on the road map) But ZFS at the moment supports Sun cluster 3.2 (no paralel acccess is supported) and new upcoming SAS Jbods

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11111 Bug ID: 11111 Summary: Describe the interaction between --one-file-system and --delete-excluded Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2143 Bug ID: 2143 Summary: X11 forwarding for ipv4 is broken when ipv6 is disabled on the loopback interface Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.3p1 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5

Hi, all, I'm attempting to run a Windows 2003 (32-bit) VM under CentOS 5.4, generally following: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/KVM I've seen nice performance benefits with the VirtIO driver under Fedora, so I'd like to get that running with CentOS as well. I have the September drivers build .iso. According to: http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Virtio I need a KVM version 60

TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - FreeBSD freebsd-legacy2.sentex.ca 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 root at farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2012-12-04 23:10:18 - cleaning

TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:00 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:00 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:30 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2008-08-27 11:26:30 - /usr/bin/csup -r 3 -g -L 1 -h localhost -s /tinderbox/RELENG_7/amd64/amd64/supfile TB --- 2008-08-27

Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > > > >> Yes, in english, 'work as a whole' does mean complete. And the normal > >> interpretation is that it covers everything linked into the same > >> process at runtime unless there is an alternate

Hello, I'm experiencing a kernel panic that appears to be caused by zfs. No errors are making it into /var/log/messages, but here is the error message that appears on my screen after panic (transcribed): panic solaris assert BSWAP_32(sa_hdr_phys->sa_magic) == SA_MAGIC, file: /src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/sa.c, line 1262 I can reproduce this by

(i use the term loosely because i know that zfs likes whole volumes better) when installing ubuntu, i got in the habit of using a separate partition for my home directory so that my data and gnome settings would all remain intact when i reinstalled or upgraded. i''m running osol 2008.11 on an ultra 20, which has only two drives. i''ve got all my data located in my home directory,

Hello, 9-STABLE fails to build with clang and *without* "NO_WERROR=" and "WERROR=" in /etc/make.conf. It used to work not long before : FreeBSD zozo.afpicl.lan 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0 r237222M: Mon Jun 18 10:18:54 CEST 2012 root@zozo.afpicl.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CORE amd64 # svnversion 238067M # make NOCLEAN=yes NO_CLEAN=yes buildworld [...] ===> cddl/lib