similar to: 6352071 MDB ::interrupts need not display non-ISR entries on x86

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 500 matches similar to: "6352071 MDB ::interrupts need not display non-ISR entries on x86"

2008 Dec 05
0
resync onnv_105 partial for 6713916
Author: Darren Moffat <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Latest revision: 957d30a3607ed9f3cbe490da5894d1e1b2104033 Total changesets: 28 Log message: resync onnv_105 partial for 6713916 Files: usr/src/Makefile.lint usr/src/Targetdirs usr/src/cmd/Makefile usr/src/cmd/Makefile.cmd usr/src/cmd/acctadm/Makefile usr/src/cmd/acctadm/acctadm.xcl
2006 Oct 31
0
4855218 sparc: Need EFI label support on IDE
Author: lclee Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: c80632cae25a4c92285f9e6434b64aa3f3aa6b79 Log message: 4855218 sparc: Need EFI label support on IDE 6275431 x86: Need EFI label support on IDE 6340778 cmlb: common disk label code 6326547 format: converting EFI to VTOC, fdisk info is taken from a random disk 6335611 format: Need to warn users that data will be lost when converting to and from
2006 Oct 31
0
4907972 ON packages: more typos in pkginfo files
Author: comay Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 995b6c053845811b23c196dc9e221620ed5ea04c Log message: 4907972 ON packages: more typos in pkginfo files 6403105 ON packages need update to satisfy new package audits Files: update: usr/src/pkgdefs/PHXext/pkginfo.tmpl update: usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNW1394/pkginfo.tmpl update: usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNW1394h/pkginfo.tmpl update:
2006 Oct 31
0
6343783 SUNWcsl claims to be a usr package, but delivers root bits
Author: kucharsk Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 47b55cefbda15c0b07f74a8d2c0d12611bcafe9c Log message: 6343783 SUNWcsl claims to be a usr package, but delivers root bits Files: update: usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWcsl/prototype_i386 update: usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWcslr/prototype_i386
2006 Oct 31
0
PSARC/2002/762 Layered Trusted Solaris
Author: jpk Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: e7e07b2f4fcfbe725493f4074f9e9f0d8bfd8e1c Log message: PSARC/2002/762 Layered Trusted Solaris PSARC/2005/060 TSNET: Trusted Networking with Security Labels PSARC/2005/259 Layered Trusted Solaris Label Interfaces PSARC/2005/573 Solaris Trusted Extensions for Printing PSARC/2005/691 Trusted Extensions for Device Allocation PSARC/2005/723 Solaris
2006 Oct 31
0
6427444 add ::softint support for x64
Author: anish Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: dd242801250e0f77ff81a2cde19ac40dec0d88af Log message: 6427444 add ::softint support for x64 Files: update: usr/src/cmd/mdb/common/mdb/mdb_ks.h update: usr/src/cmd/mdb/common/modules/mdb_ks/mdb_ks.c update: usr/src/cmd/mdb/i86pc/modules/pcplusmp/apic.c update: usr/src/cmd/mdb/i86pc/modules/uppc/intr_common.c update:
2006 Oct 31
0
PSARC/2005/625 Greyhound - Solaris Kernel SSL proxy
Author: kais Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 4c19f37f44f83def06a8aab4c0e079347eedd284 Log message: PSARC/2005/625 Greyhound - Solaris Kernel SSL proxy 4931229 Kernel-level SSL proxy Files: create: usr/src/cmd/cmd-inet/usr.sbin/kssl/kssladm/Makefile create: usr/src/cmd/cmd-inet/usr.sbin/kssl/kssladm/kssladm.c create: usr/src/cmd/cmd-inet/usr.sbin/kssl/kssladm/kssladm.h create:
2008 May 16
0
Some of AES_CBC_PAD team missed the last bus home
Author: Darren Moffat <darrenm at opensolaris.org> Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Latest revision: 6dded109490e79f82f24b9ba0b3465cb1e6a96e6 Total changesets: 1 Log message: Some of AES_CBC_PAD team missed the last bus home pam_zfs_key module not in this phase fs-local failure if ''zfs mount -a'' fails isn''t our call zoneadm/zfs.c 1866 libzfs_jni needs updated or
2006 Oct 31
0
6414036 ::interrupts share_cnt can be misleading
Author: anish Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 445b09139fca7f498d4a47a7a31fc69e742dd484 Log message: 6414036 ::interrupts share_cnt can be misleading 6415576 add new options to ::interrupts for displaying intrstat like output etc. Files: update: usr/src/cmd/mdb/i86pc/modules/pcplusmp/apic.c update: usr/src/cmd/mdb/i86pc/modules/uppc/uppc.c
2008 Mar 27
3
kernel memory and zfs
We have a 32 GB RAM server running about 14 zones. There are multiple databases, application servers, web servers, and ftp servers running in the various zones. I understand that using ZFS will increase kernel memory usage, however I am a bit concerned at this point. root at servername:~/zonecfg #mdb -k Loading modules: [ unix krtld genunix specfs dtrace uppc pcplusmp ufs md mpt ip indmux ptm
2006 Oct 31
0
PSARC 2006/054 DTrace JNI Binding
Author: tomee Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 367993089b181886f94c88ffa5759d0626e95ad7 Log message: PSARC 2006/054 DTrace JNI Binding 6384263 PSARC 2006/054 DTrace JNI Binding Files: create: usr/src/lib/libdtrace_jni/Makefile create: usr/src/lib/libdtrace_jni/Makefile.com create: usr/src/lib/libdtrace_jni/amd64/Makefile create: usr/src/lib/libdtrace_jni/common/dtj_attr.c create:
2006 Oct 31
0
6312695 memnode.h deliverable is present on sun4u/sun4v but not on x86 platform.
Author: mishra Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: 4fe0619163c071a1d2de7f6d6c99569485758c3c Log message: 6312695 memnode.h deliverable is present on sun4u/sun4v but not on x86 platform. Files: update: usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWhea/prototype_i386
2009 Apr 25
0
qemu 0.10.2 and Solaris snv111 64 Bit /"unexpected erratum #100"
Hi I''ve installed Solaris snv111 in a QEMU virtual machine using qemu 0.10.2 with kqemu 1.4 enabled. The installation worked without problems but after rebooting from the virtual disk Solaris panics: qemu usage: /opt/qemu_0.10.x/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -net user -net nic -usb -usbdevice tablet -L /usr/local/share/qemu_0.9.x -boot c -m 1024 -net nic,model=rtl8139 -net nic -net nic
2011 Dec 23
0
dtrace-discuss Digest, Vol 80, Issue 6
Have you considered the mdb dcmd ::pfiles? mfe at inker:~/Code/dtrace/examples$ *pfexec mdb -k* Loading modules: [ unix genunix specfs dtrace mac cpu.generic uppc pcplusmp scsi_vhci zfs ip hook neti sockfs arp usba uhci fctl s1394 stmf stmf_sbd md lofs random idm sd crypto fcp cpc fcip smbsrv nfs ufs logindmux ptm nsmb sppp nsctl sdbc rdc sv ii ipc ] > *::ps ! grep clock-applet* R 1744
2006 Oct 05
0
Crash when doing rm -rf
Not an really good subject, I know but that''s kind of what happend. I''m trying to build an backup-solution server, Windows users using OSCAR (which uses rsync) to sync their files to an folder and when complete takes a snapshot. It has worked before but then I turned on the -R switch to rsync and when I then removed the folder with rm -rf it crashed. I didn''t save what
2011 Dec 02
2
[LLVMdev] R: Re: LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32
>Da: hfinkel at anl.gov >Data: 02/12/2011 16.27 >A: "acrux_it at libero.it"<acrux_it at libero.it> >Cc: <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >Ogg: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32 > >On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 09:15 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 06:58 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: >> > Nico, >> > >> >
2011 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] R: Re: LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 20:18 +0100, acrux_it at libero.it wrote: > >Da: hfinkel at anl.gov > >Data: 02/12/2011 16.27 > >A: "acrux_it at libero.it"<acrux_it at libero.it> > >Cc: <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > >Ogg: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM-3.0 fails to build on linux ppc32 > > > >On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 09:15 -0600, Hal Finkel wrote: > >>
2010 Mar 03
1
using upscode2 driver with Powerware 5119 RM
I've got a Powerware 5119 RM UPS. driver.list says to use "genericups upstype=20", however I know this UPS supports the UPS Code II protocol, so I wanted to use the upscode2 driver. It took some hacking but finally it works. I'm using NUT 2.4.1 and upscode2 driver version 0.87 (however the latest r2350 version of upscode2.c isn't significantly different, so I think all
2007 Apr 30
4
B62 AHCI and ZFS
Hardware Supermicro X7DAE (AHCI BIOS) dual Intel Woodcrest processors, 6 x Western Digital Raptor SATA drives. I have installed b62 running 64 bit succesfully on a PATA drive. The BIOS is configured to access the SATA drives in native mode using hte AHCI Bios. I have 6 SATA II drives accessed via the Solaris AHCI driver. I have created a ZFS file system across all 6 drives. This works fine until
2008 Dec 26
19
separate home "partition"?
(i use the term loosely because i know that zfs likes whole volumes better) when installing ubuntu, i got in the habit of using a separate partition for my home directory so that my data and gnome settings would all remain intact when i reinstalled or upgraded. i''m running osol 2008.11 on an ultra 20, which has only two drives. i''ve got all my data located in my home directory,