similar to: Bug#391935: updated trademark policy

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0-unstable-1-amd64 Version: 3.0-unstable+hg11561-1 Severity: serious It seems Xen has a similar trademark policy as the much discussed Mozilla one. Specifically http://www.xensource.com/xen-tm-faq.html says: | 16. If I distribute a changed version of the Xen? hypervisor, may I | say that the changed product is the Xen hypervisor? | | No. If you have changed an

Hi folks XenSource published a trademark policy[1]. I don't think we will be able to follow it if we want to support installation of different versions at the same time. Bastian [1]: http://www.xensource.com/company/legal.html -- There are some things worth dying for. -- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3201.7 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was

Hi, I usually stay away from issues like this, basically because I'm not a lawyer (and don't want to be one), and I don't have a real interest in these issues. Quoting Tatu : > We also have a trademark pending on the Secure Shell mark This seriously undermines the IETF standard draft. It's the same as registering 'milk' as a trademark. Both Secure and Shell are

Hi, I simply asked to upstream for a clarification on the use of the Xen trademark, and received two unambiguous answers. From Citrix: Actually, for the community, you can do whatever you like. The FIT test only applies to commercially distributed Xen products - and is about ensuring compatibility between vendors. Do you need more detail than that?

I received the following e-mail in response to an e-mail I had sent to SSH communications questioning the wisdom of their requesting OpenSSH to change it's name. Contained in the message is that statement that SSH Communications did not exert their trademark rights earlier becuase it's only recently that OpenSSH has become more visible. In the United States, this would invalidate the

I would also like to mention that when I released TTSSH in May 1998, I had no concerns about violating any trademarks because I observed that the name "SSH" was already being used by several different parties for different purposes --- as the name of Ylonen's original SSH package and its derivatives, as the name of the protocol, and as a component of names of other implementations

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 391935 + lenny-ignore Bug#391935: Xen trademark might be problematic There were no tags set. Tags added: lenny-ignore > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

A new version of httpd is available for CentOS-3 i386 This fixes a missed trademark issue in previous build. https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710 refers. Updated files are :- updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.i386.rpm updates/i386/SRPMS/httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.src.rpm yum update httpd will be

An updated squirrelmail has been released for CentOS-3 that removes a trademark problem. https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682 Updated file is :- squirrelmail-1.4.3-0.e3.1.centos.1.noarch.rpm in updates/i386/RPMS/ These are

A recent message announced new httpd packages that fixed a trademark issue (refer to https://bugzilla.caosity.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710) These have now been made available for x86_64: RPMS/httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.x86_64.rpm RPMS/httpd-devel-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.x86_64.rpm RPMS/mod_ssl-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.x86_64.rpm SRPMS/httpd-2.0.46-44.ent.centos.2.src.rpm Execute "yum update

I'd like to address several issues raised by people in relation to my notice of the ssh(R) trademark to the OpenSSH group. Also, I would like to make a proposal to the community for resolving this issue (included at the end). First, I'll answer a number of questions and arguments presented in the discussion. > "the SSH Corp trademark registration in the US is for a logo

Just thought I'd put my two cents in about the trademark infringement issue. I ran the true SSH for about a month some time back. When I learned of OpenSSH, I dropped the official product and built OpenSSH. Quite frankly, OpenSSH is a superior package. It is cleaner, commercially unencumbered, and with its affiliation to the OpenBSD team, I feel more secure about the code quality. When

Hi everyone. I want to point out some facts about TTSSH that may be relevant to the claims of trademark infringement by OpenSSH. I'll confine my opinions to another message :-). I released my product, which has always been named "Teraterm SSH" and is usually abbreviated to "TTSSH", to the public in May 1998. TTSSH is a free software Windows client for the SSH1 protocol.

=== xen-3: = 2 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #391935 <http://bugs.debian.org/391935> Xen trademark might be problematic - #490409 <http://bugs.debian.org/490409> CVE-2008-2004: privilege escalation ------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------ This is an automated mail. These mails are sent two times per month. For more information

=== xen-3: = 1 bug(s) that should be fixed for the next Debian release: - #391935 <http://bugs.debian.org/391935> Xen trademark might be problematic ------------ interesting stuff probably ends here ------------ This is an automated mail. These mails are sent two times per month. For more information about these mails, refer to http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail We are sorry

Colleagues, What is the easiest means to embed a: ? (registered) or ? (trademark) sign in text in a graphic. I would like to use mtext and avoid plotmath, if possible. Ideally, the sign should be superscripted but I can easily sacrifice that. Optimally, I need a solution that works in both OS X and Windows (? XP) and with R versions ? 2.11 Thanks in advance. Dennis Dennis Fisher MD P <

There was an interesting note in a recent fedoraproject.org newsletter regarding Redhat's legal views on referring to others' trademarks. Since the comments are lengthy, they are not reproduced here and are available at the links below. FWN/Issue161: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FWN/Issue161#Legal Callaway note:

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > reassign 442380 xen-utils-3.2-1 Bug#442380: xen-utils-3.1-1: reenabled blktap support unusable Warning: Unknown package 'xen-utils-3.1-1' Bug reassigned from package `xen-utils-3.1-1' to `xen-utils-3.2-1'. > reassign 445243 xen-utils-3.2-1 Bug#445243: xen-utils-3.1: qemu-dm should be built with alsa support to avoid

Hi, sorry if this is considered off-topic, however I suspect that this list is full of people developing their own web apps who would appreciate this kind of information, so: I was wondering whether anybody would be willing to share his/her experience with trademarking a web app''s name(/logo) in the US. What are the alternatives, and what is the best/most affordable way to do it?

On 18-Oct-2008, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > tags 391935 + lenny-ignore No further information has been added on the status of this bug. Can we please get a justification in the bug report of why this is being tagged ?lenny-ignore?? -- \ ?Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to | `\ think.? ?Niels Bohr |