similar to: Missing devel packages?

It appears that doveadm output format changes every now and then, without particular notice. For example, the following command: doveadm -f pager mailbox status 'messages recent' '*' did output something like this until v2.2.24 : mailbox: Mailbox1 messages: 58 recent: 12 ^L mailbox: Mailbox2 messages: 128 recent: 0 but switched to that in v2.2.26 : Mailbox1 messages: 58

Accessing or listing "mdbox_deleted" contents seems to destroy MDBOX indexes. Examples of commands which triggers this problem ($home being the home directory of $user, and mail_location being mdbox:~/mdbox): doveadm -o mail="mdbox_deleted:$home/mdbox" -f table mailbox status -u "$user" 'messages vsize' INBOX doveadm -v import -s -u "$user"

Hello, some days ago I followed these instructions https://sigs.centos.org/virt/tdx/host/ and after enabling the repo I installed the tdx necessary bits as indicated, with the command dnf install kernel-tdx qemu-kvm-tdx libvirt-tdx This gave me: libvirt 9.5.0-1.el9s qemu-kvm 8.0.0-15.el9s kernel 5.14.0-395.el9s But now if I run a usual "dnf update" I'm proposed

Hi, I've got a File name too long problem using rsync-2.5.6 or rsync 2.5.5-0.1 (debian) I had a look to the mailing list archive and to the todo file and all I've seen was that the problem only appears on old special systems. I'm using debian 2.2.20. (is it too old?) I've already posted this bug in debian bug tracking system

> On 21/03/2023 00:26 EET Benoit Branciard <benoit.branciard at univ-paris1.fr> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I have some trouble using "doveadm altmove -r". > > Regular "doveadm altmove" is OK, selected mails were moved to alternate > storage as expected. But I can't manage to get them back to original > location, "doveadm altmove

Hello, I have some trouble using "doveadm altmove -r". Regular "doveadm altmove" is OK, selected mails were moved to alternate storage as expected. But I can't manage to get them back to original location, "doveadm altmove -r" has no effect. We are using Dovecot 2.3.4 (Debian Buster package). mail_location =

On 01/05/2023 15:10, lejeczek via CentOS wrote: > Hi guys, > > Does your 'mock' work when used with 'centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64' config? > It fails for me with every rpm packages I tried: > > -> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock > --localrepo=/devs/var/www/dnf.repo --chain --continue > rpmbuild/rpm.src/pass-1.7.4-6.el9.src.rpm

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 11:57?PM Michael B Allen <ioplex at gmail.com> wrote: > > Just updated CentOS 9 Stream on a Lenovo T17 Gen 4 Intel and now it > won't suspend with the following error: ... > [ 72.805437] Freezing of tasks failed after 20.006 seconds (1 tasks > refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0): > [ 72.805450] task:NFSv4 callback state:I stack:0 pid:2191

Hi guys, Does your 'mock' work when used with 'centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64' config? It fails for me with every rpm packages I tried: -> $ mock -r centos-stream+epel-9-x86_64 --rootdir=~/mock --localrepo=/devs/var/www/dnf.repo --chain --continue rpmbuild/rpm.src/pass-1.7.4-6.el9.src.rpm ... CentOS Stream 9 - BaseOS 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB???? 00:00 The GPG keys listed for the

Hi, Your problem might be similar to mine a long time ago. IMO behavior of "doveadm altmove -r" command with mdbox format is different to sdbox format: - With sdbox format, when you move back a message to primary storage (aka default storage), only the message and the file containing it are affected. There is nothing impacted. - With mdbox format, a file in storage contains

in Dovecot 2.0, is it possible to have kind of "cumulative" multiple userdb ? that is, for all users: - extract some attributes (let's say: uid, gid, home) from a first userdb (Passwd for example), - an extract some other attributes (mail for example, but overwriting those from the first userdb in case of redundancy) from a second userdb (LDAP for example) ? This is *different*

Hello, I have a CentOS Stream 9 server. It is an Intel D50DNP1SBB one with: 02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ASPEED Technology, Inc. ASPEED Graphics Family (rev 52) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) DeviceName: ASPEED AST2600 Subsystem: ASPEED Technology, Inc. ASPEED Graphics Family Flags: medium devsel, IRQ 16, NUMA node 0, IOMMU group 42 Memory at 94000000 (32-bit,

I have two suggestions about how to keep - for a while - the 388 kernel. First - Use DNF to remove the bad kernels. Then when a new one comes in it will take one of those slots. Second - Increase the number of installed kernels. That change is in yum.conf. https://linuxconfig.org/how-to-remove-old-unused-kernels-on-centos-linux If the number is too high, you may run out of room in /boot

Hello, Here is a patch for protocol_subnet.c with two modifications : - in tunnelserver mode, tinc must check subnets in the ".../hosts/owner" config file, not in "c->config_tree" (which is the configuration of the meta-connection from which we receive the ADD_SUBNET message). - this checking can be made before the check of the owner, especially before any

Hi, we just upgraded our mailserver from Dovecot 1.0.15 to Dovecot 2.1.7. We use MBOX format (due to legacy compatibility), system users, PAM+GSSAPI auth, filesystem quotas, and indexes located on a separate filesystem: mail_location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=~/mail/INBOX:INDEX=/var/cache/dovecot/indexes/%16Hu/%u The 2.1.7 configuration files have been rewritten based on default templates

Hi, I've discovered an issue which I don't understand. On a new test install of EL9 I saw this message in the logs: Mar 01 08:09:18 <hostname> pcp-pmie[2870]: Low random number entropy available 15.6%avail at beta.corp.invoca.ch This is on a 64 core "AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6282 SE" server but I also got the same low entropy on an EL9 KVM guest running on a "AMD

Looks like the GPG key we use to sign our RPMs is not longer good with EL9: # rpm --import RPM-GPG-KEY-nwra error: RPM-GPG-KEY-nwra: key 1 import failed gpg key info: sec rsa2048/35DDB0B86218AC2F created: 2017-08-16 expires: never usage: SC trust: ultimate validity: ultimate ssb rsa2048/6A7FBC1E9DB22E8E created: 2017-08-16 expires: never usage: E Can someone

On 6/1/22 13:43, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 01/06/2022 19:51, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> Looks like the GPG key we use to sign our RPMs is not longer good with EL9: >> >> # rpm --import RPM-GPG-KEY-nwra >> error: RPM-GPG-KEY-nwra: key 1 import failed >> >> gpg key info: >> >> sec? rsa2048/35DDB0B86218AC2F >> ????? created: 2017-08-16?

Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch> > 2) some symlinks created by udev are just wrong and therefore very > dangerous to use: > scsi-SHP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_500143801722C0B0 -> ../../sda > scsi-SHP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_500143801722C0B0-part1 -> ../../sdb1 > scsi-SHP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_500143801722C0B0-part2 -> ../../sdb2 I think it maybe caused by sd driver asynchronous

Hi, > Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch> >> 2) some symlinks created by udev are just wrong and therefore very >> dangerous to use: >> scsi-SHP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_500143801722C0B0 -> ../../sda >> scsi-SHP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_500143801722C0B0-part1 -> ../../sdb1 >> scsi-SHP_LOGICAL_VOLUME_500143801722C0B0-part2 -> ../../sdb2 > > I think it