similar to: Re: Shorewall-users Digest, Vol 10, Issue 59

Hi, I''d like to use psad from www.cipherdyne.com that analyze iptables log messages on my firewall-shorewall. It complains to incorrectly configured iptables when starting. This is the message : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ** The INPUT chain in the iptables ruleset on debian4 includes a default LOG rule for all

> On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 07:10, Tom Eastep wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 06:59, Tom Eastep wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-09-19 at 06:52, Petr Novák wrote: > > > > > > > Is there a way for shorewall to be comatible with psad ? > > > > > > >From the above messages, it doesn''t seem likely. > > > > > > >

On 23/04/15 02:48, Fred Smith wrote: > Hi all > > On latest samba 4.2.1 I have provisioned a new domain on DC1 that > successfully reads RFC2307 attributes set on a user account through > ADUC. > > wbinfo (correct uid gets resolved from sid) > > wbinfo -n fsmith > S-1-5-21-1273750850-484487853-1026460749-1120 SID_USER (1) > wbinfo -S

Hi all On latest samba 4.2.1 I have provisioned a new domain on DC1 that successfully reads RFC2307 attributes set on a user account through ADUC. wbinfo (correct uid gets resolved from sid) wbinfo -n fsmith S-1-5-21-1273750850-484487853-1026460749-1120 SID_USER (1) wbinfo -S S-1-5-21-1273750850-484487853-1026460749-1120 1000006 ldbsearch sudo ldbsearch -H

Just installed psad and am testing it. This morning I awoke to an email saying: [-] You may just need to add a default logging rule to the /sbin/ip6tables ''filter'' ''INPUT'' chain on hydra. For more information, see the file "FW_HELP" in the psad sources directory or visit: http://www.cipherdyne.org/psad/docs/fwconfig.html Well I have

Hi Renato, Thanks for your response. My concern was actually this. For example, take vector type V8i16 on X86 target With llvm.sad() intrinsic: VC1 (Vector Cost) = Cost associated with "PSAD" instruction. W/ llvm.absd() and llvm.hadd() VC2 = Cost associated with "absolute diff" + "horizontal add" ( ??? ) As I will be querying with getIntrinsicCost(ID) for these

On 4 May 2015 at 08:37, Shahid, Asghar-ahmad <Asghar-ahmad.Shahid at amd.com> wrote: > My worry is regarding the query for cost calculation for specific SAD > instructions such as ‘psad’ (X86) or ‘usad’ (ARM) in Loop Vectorizer. Hi Shahid, The vectorizer's cost model has the ability to return different costs for the same instruction based on the arguments (scalar/vector,

CentOS4 RPMS for x86-64 would be awesome. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tony Hoover, Network Administrator KSU - Salina, College of Technology and Aviation (785) 826-2660 "Don't Blend in..." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From:

Suyog, Thanks for the reply. Do you know if it is possible to add a new intrinsic without actually modifying core code (ISDOpcodes.h is an example of core code)? I'd like to add this intrinsic with as little code change as possible. On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:59 PM, suyog sarda <sardask01 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Rail, > > Below 2 revisions might be of your interest which

Hello Leon. In addition to everything else mentioned in this thread, I'd recommend you a great book on the topic. "Attack Detection and Response with iptables, psad, and fwsnort by Michael Rash" It contains a really nice and detailed guide on iptables and most common attacks, nmap, psad and snort. Regarding your config, I'd like to point several things: 1. You're not

Hello List, In regards to RPM packages, what is the difference in the prebuilt ones for example the FC5 RPM's directly from samba.org or obtaining the latest .tar.gz and running ./makerpms.sh for the desired distribution. Does this way optimize for example - x86-64 or SMP ? Cheers, Adrian Sender. -----Original Message----- From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:jerry@samba.org] Sent:

Hi Shahid. Do you mind providing a concrete example of X86 code where an intrinsic was added (preferrable with filenames and line numbers)? I'm having difficulty tracking down the steps you provided. Any help is appreciated. On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:02 PM, Shahid, Asghar-ahmad < Asghar-ahmad.Shahid at amd.com> wrote: > Hi Rail, > > > > We had done this for generation

Hello, I was looking at the following test case which is very relevant in imaging applications. int sad(unsigned char *pix1, unsigned char *pix2) { int sum = 0; for( int x = 0; x < 16; x++ ) { sum += abs( pix1[x] - pix2[x] ); } return sum; } The llvm IR generated after all the IR

Dear Members Thank you for your replies. @Anthony K. -- One of the articles that I have read mentioned that the file gets read from the top to bottom and apply the rules accordingly. In addition the article also explained that if there is no matching rule, the default policy will be applied. The writer suggested that rules with the highest chance to match should be in the beginning of the

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > Hi Vijender, > > Thanks for posting this, there is wide support here for improving our support for reductions of various kinds, both in flavor and robustness. I've cc'd some others who have previously discussed this. > > James has advocated in the past for an intrinsic for horizontal reductions,

Hi Rail, Below 2 revisions might be of your interest which Detect SAD patterns and emit psadbw instructions on X86.: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14840 http://reviews.llvm.org/D14897 Intrinsics related to absdiff revisons : http://reviews.llvm.org/D10867 http://reviews.llvm.org/D11678 Hope this helps. Regards, Suyog On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Rail Shafigulin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at

I have setup a Samba PDC with LDAP by the Samba howto. All is working fine. But when I try to add machine accounts it is giving me errors. The error is as such First I did #smbldap-useradd -w comat67$ This was successful. Then when I do this oblix:/home# pdbedit -a -m -u comat67$ Searching for:[(&(objectClass=sambaDomain)(sambaDomainName=COMAT))] smbldap_open_connection: connection

I'm a little confused. Here is why. I was able to add a vector add instruction to my target without using any intrinsics and without adding any new instructions to LLVM. So here is my question: how come I managed to add a new vector instruction without adding an intrinsic and why in order to add this particular instruction (sum elements in a vector) I need to add an insrinsic? Another

Hi Renato, That’s right. I agree with your *pattern vs complexity* thinking. So I would drop llvm.sad() and go ahead with the remaining two. Does it make sense in general? Regards, Shahid > -----Original Message----- > From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 8:40 PM > To: Shahid, Asghar-ahmad > Cc: James Molloy; llvmdev at

I'm starting to think we should directly implement horizontal operations on vector types. My suspicion is that coming up with a nice model for this would help us a lot with things like: - Idiom recognition of reduction patterns that use horizontal arithmetic - Ability to use horizontal operations in SLPVectorizer - Significantly easier cost modeling of vectorizing loops with reductions in